Showing posts with label Terrorists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Terrorists. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 23, 2021

The FBI is America's Greatest Domestic Terrorist Threat Today


It makes no sense to talk of FBI procedures and what the manual says when the FBI doesn't follow those procedures. The problem is, the FBI is helping the Democrats in attempt to ensure there will never be Republicans in power again. But, Americans are finally waking up to the corruption of the Federal Government. It comes down to corrupt people not keeping their oaths and serving their country with honor as intended.

It was the leadership in Congress that allowed this to happen, and like all dictators they used law enforcement to target their political foes. The writing on the wall should have been clear when the House was won by the Democrats in 2018 and the way they conducted politics and themselves for two years, continually attacking President Trump along with the help of the media. I do hope the true Americans are now paying attention.
News Links

‘Never seen this kind of crime in Chicago’…

World gained 5.2 M millionaires last year in Covid crisis...

'Tell me what I said wrong': Jim Jordan asks Democrat Clyburn...

CNN Reports: Dem. Sen. Whitehouse defended Whites-only club...

An interesting observation from Vladimir Putin...

Today’s Editorial Cartoon by A. F. Branco

Thursday, January 21, 2016

Democrats Vote To Let Terrorists In!


Conservative Daily -- Absolutely unbelievable. Yesterday, the Democrats blocked the American SAFE Act from receiving a final vote in the Senate.

This is the bill that would have forced the Federal government to perform more rigorous background checks on Syrian and Iraqi refugees entering the country. Apparently, that's too much for Harry Reid and the Democrats. Apparently, ensuring that terrorists are kept out of the country is too much to ask.

55 Senators voted for the bill, just shy of the 60 required to end debate. The Democrats filibustered it. They are completely content with letting terrorists slip through.

This cannot stand. Already, GOP leadership is saying that the bill is dead. They are giving up fighting for this!
Blog Author's Comments -- Obviously Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan have surrendered on this. On Wednesday, Senate Democrats successfully and predictably blocked what many conservatives described as Rep. Paul Ryan's "Show Vote" on refugee admissions.

It has been called a show vote because the Ryan plan, even if the President signed it, would still allow the President to bring in an unlimited number of refugees from an unlimited number of countries.

Democrats’ filibuster on the motion to proceed to Ryan’s show vote comes one month after Speaker Ryan sent President Obama a blank check to fund visa issuances to nearly 300,000 (temporary and permanent) Muslim migrants in the next 12 months alone. Ryan’s decision to fully-fund Obama’s immigration agenda arguably ceded any leverage he may otherwise have had over Democrats and ensured the large-scale migration into America would continue and grow.

Ryan’s bill, known as the American SAFE Act, was blocked.[...]

Ryan’s inability to develop a winning strategy suggests he failed at what he has called the “first duty of the government.” Ryan declared after the SAFE Act’s initial passage in the House:
The first duty of our government is to keep the American people safe. That’s why, today, the House will vote on a plan to pause our Syrian refugee program… If our law enforcement and intelligence community cannot verify that each and every person coming here is not a security threat, then they shouldn’t be allowed in. Right now, the government can’t certify these standards, so this plan pauses the program. It’s a security test—not a religious test. This reflects our values. This reflects our responsibilities. And this is urgent. We cannot and should not wait to act—not when our national security is at stake.
Ryan informed the press that he had “reached out to our Democratic colleagues” in crafting the plan, and touted his acquisition a “veto-proof majority”—which no longer seems relevant since the Senate blocked further movement on the bill.

Even if the Republicans win the White House in November this gives Obama and the Democrats an entire year with an open door to the illegals. And many of them are sure to be terrorists.


h/t: Breitbart
Obama Travel Expenses Cost Taxpayers $10 Million A Year

Mag. Trump Strongest Primary Performance In Modern History

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

WSJ/NBC Poll: Most Americans Say CIA 'Harsh Interrogation' Acceptable


WSJ -- Most Americans don’t object to the CIA’s interrogation techniques that some call torture, according to the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll.

After being told the CIA used “harsh interrogation practices on suspected terrorists,” 51% of those surveyed said the practices were “acceptable under the circumstances.” Only 28% said the interrogations were wrong and 20% said they didn’t have an opinion.

President Barack Obama ended the practice, known legally as “enhanced interrogation”, early in his White House tenure. But 45% of those polled said the CIA should continue to use them, while just 28% said they are wrong and should not be used.

The poll question didn’t use the word “torture” when it asked about the CIA’s detention and interrogation program, which relied on methods including sleep deprivation and waterboarding to try to get overseas terror suspects to share information while in U.S. custody.

The poll data is evidence that there is little political risk for Republicans who opposed last week’s release of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s report on post-9/11 CIA interrogation techniques. Even with graphic descriptions of how detainees were treated becoming public for the first time, most people said the practices were justified in the name of stopping terror plots.

Indeed the Pew Research Center found a similar answer recently. Its poll showed 58% believe the practice provided intelligence that prevented terror attacks – even though the Senate’s report states the opposite.

With Senate Republicans opposing the Senate report’s release and former Vice President Dick Cheney touting the program, a political split on the torture report is inevitable. Four in five Republicans say the CIA’s practices were acceptable, but Democrats aren’t all opposed: 44% say the CIA went too far after 9/11, but 32% say it was acceptable. That may explain why Sen. Mark Udall (D., Colo.), one of the CIA’s leading Capitol Hill antagonists, never seriously used the issue in his failed re-election campaign.
Blog author's comments - As the poll shows not everyone wants to victimize the 9/11 terrorists - in fact, few people outside the left do. The Democrats' Senate report was done for purely political reasons. "After being told the CIA used “harsh interrogation practices on suspected terrorists,” 51% of those surveyed said the practices were “acceptable under the circumstances.” Only 28% said the interrogations were wrong and 20% said they didn’t have an opinion." The 20% are the low-information people who receive their news from ABC, CBS, CNN and MSNBC and believe what they hear and see.

If Obama's presidency has showed us anything it's that he doesn't give a damn what Americans want or think. I suppose the Democrats believe that the American people want terrorists treated without any harm to them, especially when they may know of plans for more attacks on civilian population centers. I would not have cared if the CIA used a blow torch on them, when I remember our fellow Americans jumping from the World Trade Center buildings after the attack. Whenever I picture that, water boarding is child's play. Former Vice President Dick Cheney said the CIA torture report is 'full of crap'. I respect him and believe him. When asked about the interrogation techniques Cheney said, "I would do it again in a minute."


Cheney On Interrogation: "I Would Do It Again In A Minute"

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

McCain Rejects Report Claiming Syrian Rebels Are Largely Jihadis


Daily Caller -- Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain hotly disputed a study claiming that at least half of Syria’s rebels are radical jihadis, repeatedly exclaiming “Not true, not true!”

“Frankly, I just disagree,” McCain told the Council on Foreign Relations audience, challenging the contention by defense consultancy IHS Jane’s that “the insurgency is now dominated by groups with at least an Islamist viewpoint of the conflict.”

“There’s about 70 percent still who are Free Syrian Army,” McCain said, flipping on its head the consulting firm’s research showing that just 30 percent are fighting for secular values.

McCain has frequently called for an increase in arms shipments to rebels groups fighting the Assad regime, and on Tuesday evening he sought to diminish concerns that these arms may one day be turned against the United States or its allies.

“The point, I think, that you and others are missing,” he told the questioner, “[is that] Syria is a moderate nation. Syria has the highest literacy rate of any nation in the Middle East. They are not going to submit to a jihadis or al-Qaida group governing them. They will not.”

“That’s a really a convenient cop-out to say, ‘Oh, we don’t know who they are,’” he continued angrily. “I know who they are. I was in Syria and I met them.”[...]

McCain also dismissed the Obama administration’s line that negotiations between the United States, Syria and Russia to destroy Syria’s chemical weapons stockpiles represented a turning point in the conflict.

Entire column...
Blog author's comments - I don't believe that Senator John McCain is correct about the Syrian rebel forces. Approximately half of Syrian rebel fighters are jihadists or hard line Islamists, according to a new report by London intelligence and defense consultancy IHS Jane’s. IHS Jane’s is the renowned global open-source intelligence provider to militaries, governments, intelligence agencies and industry. McCain has an ego problem that is epidemic among many politicians in this country. The President really suffers from it the most. They will never admit they could be wrong.

McCain is the same Senator who said that rebels shouting, during battle 'Allahu Akbar' is the same as American troops shouting 'Thank God.' Yes he actually said that two weeks ago. John McCain would like to remove Assad from Syria and I would guess so does Obama, but they would be challenging Putin of Russia which I don't think Obama would ever attempt to do.

McCain is hopefully going to retire after his current term in the Senate is over and he may be attempting to leave a legacy of some sort with his involvement in the Syrian conflict and other issues. What I could never understand is how the voters in Arizona keep reelecting him to his Senate seat. McCain did go to Syria and he supposedly met with a few rebels so that makes him an expert and someone we can trust to know what he is talking about? I don't think so.


John McCain Compares 'Allahu Akbar' And 'Thank God'

Obama Bypasses Terrorism Rule To Give Weapons To Syrian Rebels

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Great Invention - The Patriot Micro Chip

The Patriot Micro Chip

The Patriot Micro Chip is intended to be implanted in terrorists. The implant is specifically designed to be installed in the forehead. When properly installed it will allow the implantee to speak to God.

It comes in various sizes:

The exact size of the implant will be selected by a well-trained and highly-skilled technician. The implant may or may not be painless. Side effects, like headaches and nausea, are temporary. Some bleeding or swelling may occur at the injection site.


Blog author's comments - I don't believe any further explanation is required. I am thankful that our country has the skilled troops who protect us.

The Marines…they certainly excel in the best methods to “Reach out and Touch Someone Today.” The Army has some very good practioneers of the same policy of Patriot injection as well. They all do an excellent job.