Showing posts with label DHS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DHS. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 5, 2016

DHS Says Even Vehicular Homicide Is
Not Enough To Detain Illegal Immigrants


Truth Revolt -- In a letter to Congress released Monday, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Director Sarah Saldana said that even being convicted of homicide isn’t enough to ensure that illegal aliens are detained by federal agents.

The Washington Times reports that neither Obama administration policy nor federal law required her agency to detain Edwin "Eswin" Mejia, an illegal immigrant from Honduras charged with vehicular homicide earlier this year in Nebraska.

ICE first encountered Mejia at the Arizona border in May 2013 when he was 16. The Border Patrol admitted him and turned him over to social services. He eventually went to live with his brother in the U.S. (it's unclear if his brother also is here illegally). Then this January, a drunken Mejia was street racing in Omaha when he hit a vehicle driven by Sarah Root, 21, who later died from her injuries.

Mejia posted bond on the homicide charge, and ICE officers did not come pick him up for detention, allowing him to abscond. Director Saldana said her officers should have detained him of their own volition and that she has notified all of her bureaus nationwide to do a better job of evaluating people they’re called to detain, reports the Times.

“After further review, we believe that further enforcement action would have served an important federal interest in this case,” Saldana said in a letter to Nebraska Republican Sen. Ben Sasse. She said her agency has asked Honduran officials to see if he shows up back there.

That wasn't enough for Senator Sasse, who called her response “an embarrassment” to her agency. He took up the issue with Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, demanding in a letter to know who specifically was responsible for not picking up Mejia:
Why did ICE decline to detain Mr. Mejia, despite several requests to do so by the Douglas County Police Department? Were each of these requests denied on a case-by-case basis?
In her letter to Sasse, Saldana also said that being charged with vehicular homicide wasn’t enough to make Mejia a priority under standards set by President Obama and Homeland Secretary Johnson in 2014, who announced a policy of deporting only those with the most serious criminal records. Those policies mean that more than 9 million of the estimated 11 million illegals in the U.S. have little fear of being kicked out, notes the Times.

Even if Mejia were convicted of the charge, ICE still wouldn’t have to hold him, Saldana wrote:
Even if he were convicted of the offense, motor vehicle homicide — driving under the influence, the conviction would not constitute a crime of violence under the immigration laws, and consequently, would not constitute an aggravated felony. The conviction would not render him subject to mandatory detention, nor would it significantly impact his eligibility to apply for relief or protection from removal.
Mejia was already facing deportation under his unaccompanied minor case, though that proceeding has dragged on. His court appearance was slated for later this month — nearly three years after he first entered the U.S.
Blog Author’s Comments -- The question that begs to be asked is "why?" Why would a government allow an invasion of illegals, and then allow those to stay who are a clear and present danger to their citizens? This is the 'transformation of America' that Obama promised us. And apparently this is just fine with those who voted for him as the president, twice.

This is a concerted effort to fundamentally change the demographics of the United States. And the establishment (both parties), liberals and mainstream media cannot understand the support Donald Trump has received concerning what he has said with regard to the illegals. In the meantime Obama has and is allowing millions to cross our borders with obviously no thought about the criminal activities many of them are doing that affect our own law abiding citizens.

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

ACLU - Attempting To Help Obama Win November Election


Suit filed in purge of Florida voter rolls

Politio44 -- Good-government advocates have sued the state of Florida, alleging its purge of non-citizens from voter rolls has swept up too many legally-registered African American and Latino voters and is undermining laws that ensure fair access to the ballot box.

The state chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and the local office of the international law firm of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP filed a federal lawsuit in Tampa, claiming that the state Bureau of Elections is breaking the law in its ongoing purge, designed to scrub voter registration lists ahead of the state’s August congressional primary.

Florida officials, according to the suit, are using outdated information and a badly-flawed process to conduct the purge, according to the suit. And the procedure, the advocates contend, requires lawful citizens and already legally registered voters to prove their citizenship or lose their ability to vote.

“Florida is flouting federal laws designed to protect voters from precisely this kind of action,” Bob Kengle, co-director, Voting Rights Project, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said in a statement issued Friday. “The right of every citizen to have their voice heard at the ballot box is being threatened. The Lawyers’ Committee will continue to tirelessly fight any effort to make full-fledged Americans second-class citizens.”[...]

The Justice Department last month formally asked Florida to justify the move, warning that it might violate provisions in the Voting Rights Act and the National Voter Registration Act. In their response earlier this week, Florida officials insist the scrub is legal under both statutes, and would have happened much earlier in the election cycle if the Department of Homeland Security had allowed them to use a more expansive federal database for the comparison.

Entire column...

Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) said he will sue DHS in voter registration battle


Blog author's comments - Why do the ACLU and the Democrats have such a problem with fair and transparent elections? What is it that they find offensive in this?

Liberals just hate to see their practice of trying to sway election results hampered. The law is clear, if you are not a citizen you can’t vote - it also requires that you be alive, seems fairly straight forward to me.

Has the ACLU ever done anything in favor of America? This is not a trick question. I have never heard of them doing anything that indicated a respect for America.

The Department of Homeland Security is also involved. (see link above) Florida Gov. Rick Scott said he will sue the DHS. Florida Secretary of State Ken Detzner produced the lawsuit, filed in Washington, D.C. district court on Monday, shortly after, along with a statement.

“For nearly a year, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has failed to meet its legal obligation to provide us the information necessary to identify and remove ineligible voters from Florida’s voter rolls,” Detzner said. “We can’t let the federal government delay our efforts to uphold the integrity of Florida elections any longer."

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Napolitano - Big Sis, Unfortunately In Charge!


Napolitano: We're working "364 days a year" to fightterror

hotair.com - A nuanced treat from the same tough-minded security mind who looked upon the near-destruction of Flight 253 and declared, "The system worked." In fact, now that I think of it, didn’t the Flight 253 plot go down last year on Christmas Day? Well, then, there’s your answer to why DHS missed so many red flags at the time: They had Christmas off.

Clip via Mediate, which finds the silver lining here: “Napolitano didn’t specify which day was the Homeland Security ‘off day,’ which of course helps to keep our terrorist enemies off guard.”

(Ad Will Close In A Few Seconds)


Blog author's comment - Napolitano said, we’re working “364 days a year” to fight terror. Our government at work, well, except for that one day. I have no doubt, Obama is quite proud of her. Now if she could just target the terrorists instead of the American people.

The problem is where you are directing your fight! Here is a clue, admit we are fighting radical Islam and they are our enemy. You are not working on terror. If that was the case then you need to do you job, if Obama would allow it, and enforce our borders and also round up the illegal's.

Ms. Napolitano, it is my conclusion that you are not qualified to be Director of Homeland Security.

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

TSA to Block "Controversial Opinion" on the Web


(CBS News)
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is blocking certain websites from the federal agency's computers, including halting access by staffers to any Internet pages that contain a "controversial opinion," according to an internal email obtained by CBS News.

The email was sent to all TSA employees from the Office of Information Technology on Friday afternoon.

It states that as of July 1, TSA employees will no longer be allowed to access five categories of websites that have been deemed "inappropriate for government access."

The categories include:
-Chat/Messaging
- Controversial opinion
- Criminal activity
- Extreme violence (including cartoon violence) and gruesome content
- Gaming

The email does not specify how the TSA will determine if a website expresses a "controversial opinion."

There is also no explanation as to why controversial opinions are being blocked, although the email stated that some of the restricted websites violate the Employee Responsibilities and Conduct policy.

Blog author comment - The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano aka 'Big Sis' issued new censorship rules to the TSA late last Friday afternoon, hoping her edict would slip through unnoticed over the long holiday weekend.

How will they determine just what is "controversial opinion",hmm? I think that most of us know the answer to that question. Any site that is critical of the Obama administration will be "controversial". Napolitano was told to do this by 'The Master' of us all, Barack Hussein Obama.

Well, if any of the TSA employees would by chance, stumble onto this lowly site, it would be off limits to them, too "controversial".