Blog Author's Commentary: Finally, Ingraham gives recognition for President Trump that is much deserved. She, Maria Bartiromo, Lou Dobbs and Sean Hannity remain supporters of President Trump, but the remaining people employed by Fox News the Democratic Party and the mainstream media have probably with 'fake news' and fraud, accomplished what they have been trying to do for 4 years, remove him from office.
“America was founded on liberty and independence. Not government coercion, domination, and control. We are born free and we will stay free and America will never be a socialist country.” - Donald J Trump.
This may not be a true statement after the President leaves office, and Biden/Harris are governing, guided by Barack Obama. The President has been fighting for all the people, yet so many are simply too ignorant to realize this fact.
The people of our nation have not been provided with facts only lies, by the media pretending their opinions were actual news. Ingraham's opening statement about him was surreal, for I have never heard this said on any other network including Fox that Trump has succeeded in all aspects of his presidency, because the mainstream media does not report this. The American people have been cheated and lied to by the Democratic Party and most of the televised media. We now only have Conservative talk radio and possibly Newsmax and One America News that we may be able to trust.
Fox News issued a statement standing by embattled primetime host conservative Laura Ingraham who lost over a dozen advertisers stemming from a boycott campaign by liberal Parkland school shooting student activist David Hogg.
It appears that Fox News will not give in to the David Hogg, Media Matters and #TheResistance driven faux outrage over Laura Ingraham’s mild rebuke of Hogg as someone who “whines.” That faux outrage has been used to intimidate advertisers into fleeing Ingraham’s highly-rated program.
“We cannot and will not allow voices to be censored by agenda-driven intimidation efforts,” Jack Abernethy, co-president of Fox News, said in a statement to the Los Angeles Times. “We look forward to having Laura Ingraham back hosting her program next Monday when she returns from spring vacation with her children.”
For a decade activists like Angelo Carusone of Media Matters have been trying to pick off Fox News and other conservative media personalities by bombarding advertisers on social media. If Ingraham could be taken down over a mild comment about a flame-throwing activist like Hogg, then it would be like blood in the water to the unhinged social media anti-Trump activists.
If past experience with other conservative hosts holds true this time, expect a continuing, guerilla-warfare style harassment of advertisers.
"It’s not about Laura Ingraham or David Hogg — it’s about an unhinged and emboldened totalitarian movement that seeks to deplatform conservatives. Their primary target for a decade has been Fox News, which is the one non-liberal network in a sea of liberal major media."
(Via: Legal Insurrection)Blog Author's Comments: I was pleasantly surprised Fox News made this statement and took this position, very helpful. Attention Hogg - loses all teenage protection when he calls for boycotts against corporations and peoples’ livelihoods. Good for Fox for not caving to the one way outrage industry.
Hogg wants to be taken seriously as an adult, but as soon as he receives criticism, he wants to be protected as a child. What Ingraham said was very mild compared with all the vile accusations Hogg has thrown at Rubio and the NRA. And what I am hearing is that David Hogg was not even at his school when the shooting happened, so he is not a 'survivor' of said shooting.
As Rush Limbaugh noted: These things happen like clockwork. There is an entire left-wing apparatus set up to run these operations. I don’t know about Fox, but a lot of those advertisers who were quick to drop Limbaugh came quietly slinking back when they saw the impact to their bottom lines.
Breitbart -- Laura Ingraham ripped into the “irreparably tainted” Mueller investigation into Russian collusion with the claim that it is now an example of “how big government can end up becoming a threat to a representative democracy.”
On her Thursday night edition of The Ingraham Angle, Fox News’s latest primetime star opened with a blistering breakdown of the gobsmacking corruption and conflict of interest that has fueled, not only Hillary Clinton’s exoneration over her email scandal, but Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation into Russian collusion.
Specifically, Ingraham pointed to text messages written FBI Agent Peter Strzok in August of 2016 that read: “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”
Strzok is referring to what was obviously a political meeting in FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s office.
Worse still, earlier that same month, Lisa Page (a key player in Mueller’s Russia probe) texted to Strzok: “Maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace [Trump].”
“I can protect our country at many levels,” Strzok replied.
This exchange occurred in the heart of the 2016 presidential election, and these texts relate directly to the idea of stopping Donald Trump from becoming president, to an “insurance policy” if he is elected, to an FBI Agent promising to “protect our country” from Trump on “many levels.” [...]
Strzok would go on to play a key role in aiding and abetting former FBI Director James Comey’s inexplicable exoneration of Hillary Clinton. Moreover, at this point, Clinton had spent millions to put together the phony Russia dossier that was almost certainly used by the FBI and the Obama administration to obtain the warrants necessary to spy on their political opponents in the Trump campaign.
Strzok then, inexplicably, became a top investigator for Mueller’s Russia probe, and Mueller only became a special prosecutor after Comey illegally leaked confidential notes to the news media in the hopes the appointment of a special prosecutor would be the result. Another conflict of interest is that Mueller and Comey are close friends.
If that is not bad enough, in 2015, when FBI Deputy Director McCabe’s wife ran for state senate in Virginia, longtime Clintonista Terry McAuliffe funneled some $675, 000 into her campaign. The following year, Strzok watered down the language that exonerated Hillary for her prosecutable email crimes.
And if that is not bad enough, Bruce Ohr, a top Justice Department official, is married to Nellie Ohr, who worked for Fusion GPS to put together the discredited Russian dossier.
Hovering over all of this is the number of Hillary Clinton donors hired by Mueller to investigate the man who beat her.
They were intent on preventing him from being elected by any means necessary. And if that meant applying for a FISA warrant based on a phony dossier in order to spy on the campaign, maybe they’d do it. And if it meant deploying the entire mainstream media apparatus into Defcon 1 mode; hyper-ventilating about Russian collusion 24/7, they’d do it.
Blog Author's Comments: Anyone who is paying attention to this so-called investigation knows that the Special Counsel Mueller is the head of a - bogus operation with his liberal staff. And we, the American public, are supposed to buy into this? I don't think so. Yes the #nevertrumpers are happy to see what is happening, because they still cannot understand why, or stomach the fact that Hillary Clinton was and is a terribly crooked person and candidate who ran a very poor campaign. But, now instead of moving on and doing something constructive with the rest of her life, she so badly wants to believe, that the people enjoy listening to her complain and blame everyone but herself.
If all this plays out remotely close to what it certainly looks like, it will be the biggest political scandal in US history. Between the Fusion GPS links, the Mueller team members, the continual leaks to the liberal media, Clinton email dismissal, Russia collusion and the fake news, it has all been coordinated. And, I have heard countless times that Mueller is an 'honorable man'. The Trump transition team now looks quite bad. Why were McCabe, Comey, Rosenstein and Yates allowed to stay on, and not pink slipped (the way Comey finally was) the morning after the inauguration?
Why they pulled a senator and several other people from elected positions for appointed ones? Why an older Attorney General with no stomach for the job and political baggage, rather than a younger more aggressive one? Why they allowed many members of the Obama administration to remain in their government jobs, only to be there to undermine the Trump presidency - I don't have the answer. But, all of this and more has certainly hindered Trump from accomplishing what he and the people who voted for him wanted and still want for the country. It also has not helped that so many Republican lawmakers are not actively assisting the president, but dragging their feet, when they should be doing their jobs and joining Trump, in his effort to help 'Make America Great Again'.
These People Should Be Fired, Investigated And In Court
GOP Rep: We Have Proof DOJ Worked Against Republican Party During Election
TLR -- There’s a big con job just over the horizon. All of the elements are there. The timing, the platform, the personalities, the discussion topics, etc., it’s a familiar script. The website would like to direct attention to this interview which took place last night on Laura Ingraham’s new Fox News show. Listen carefully to three elements:
♦On Tax Reform – on one side of Rubio’s ‘full-throated‘ mouth he wants higher taxes on corporations 22% -vs- 20%. In the almost the same breath, inside the same argument, he says “it’s not their (the government’s) money”. Try to reconcile that.
♦On DACA – [Remember, three months ago President Trump gave congress six months to fix DACA] Rubio says the “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” (DACA) program is not the “Dreamers”. What? Yes it is. The childhood arrivals ARE the so-called ‘dreamers’.
♦However, much more importantly, listen to what is said on “chain migration“. Ingraham asks if Rubio supports “chain migration”. Rubio says no, then immediately says: “I’ve always agreed to limiting chain migration to immediate family members”. WHAT? That is chain migration.
Blog Author's Comments: Sen. Marco Rubio sometimes attempts to be a con-artist but he does not do it well. Just tell us what you want Marco and we will decide if there is agreement with you or not. What’s bothered me was Rubio talking about adding a “child tax credit” to the tax reform bill. As I understand it this is for many people who don’t make enough to pay any income tax. In other words, it’s a handout. He tries to justify it by saying they pay payroll taxes.
This is Rubio in ‘double-speak’, which is why he didn’t make it to the presidential election. Unfortunately, the very same D.C. Swamp creatures who profess concern about the deficit are the ones who are also refusing to slash Federal spending. Rubio is a mediocre politician. Prior to the debates he was quoted as saying that he did not want to be a member of congress anymore because it bored him. But then he decided he wanted to be the president.
Laura Ingraham has been a staunch defender of Trump, not in every single thing he does or says, but Trump principles. She is apparently a disciple of Pat Buchanan and he is supposedly a regular on her radio show. She does not cave to many of the people who were on her radio show when I listened to it. I have never viewed her new Fox show.
National Review Online -- The latest numbers released by the Obama administration indicate that 5 million people have signed up for insurance under Obamacare, but the administration won’t say how many enrollees are young, how many were previously uninsured, or how many have paid for their insurance.
“They can follow every keystroke on our computers. We don’t think they know the facts on this?” Laura Ingraham said on Fox News Sunday. “Of course they do.”
Ingraham argued that if the facts were good — if youth enrollment was up and people were paying their premiums — then “Jay Carney would be crowing.”
Instead, enrollment is “lagging way behind what they want,” Ingraham said, which is why even in the midst of an international crisis with Russia and Ukraine, President Obama is making appearances with Ellen DeGeneres and on Between Two Ferns.
“The fact that you can throw in some pop-culture references and go on these cool comedy shows isn’t going to change the fact that most young people want choice, they want freedom, and they don’t want to be told what to do on health care,” Ingraham said.
Blog author's comments - Certainly the insurance companies know how many have signed up and how many paid for Obamacare. They passed those numbers on to HHS, but because the numbers are way under expectations the Obama administration cannot be truthful about them.
Let's hope the Obama presidency becomes a teachable moment for many of those who put him in office twice. I have my doubts though, the liberal press and academia will continue to blame the conservatives for Obama's failures. And Obamacare is only one of the problems we now have, the increase in taxes will be coming soon.
Those who voted for Obama deserve every single one of the problems they are now being forced to confront. They and so many of the low-information voters were easily duped by a deceptive, fraudulent community organizer. The problem is those of us who knew who he was are stuck with all he has done and will attempt to continue to do.
Blog author's comments - Allen West always gives a good interview and is not afraid to speak out against Obama's policies and agenda for the country. I happen to agree with whatever West has to say.
It's too bad he has not been a member of Congress for a few years. He would be my choice as the candidate for the GOP nomination and a person who I would feel confident that could defeat Obama in 2012.
His comment about Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee being "delusional" is quite true. Wasserman Schultz says whatever the Democrat Party programs into her head. She is the perfect drone. That is why she was made head of the DNC.
Rep. Allen West referring to Obama: "“What you continue to see is a third world dictator-like arrogance, that’s what I saw in that speech last week."
Blog author's comments - Once again Allen West is absolutely right. It’s very tough not to like this man. I do believe whoever wins the nomination for the 2012 election should give Allen West very serious consideration as their VP running mate. Too bad we don't have a dozen more like him within the ranks of the Republican Party.
Mike Huckabee Strikes Back At Chris Matthews: 'See a Doctor - You're Off Your Meds and Out of Control'
newsbusters - As NewsBusters previously reported, MSNBC's Chris Matthews on Wednesday accused former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee of wanting to commit "ethnic cleansing" on Arabs in Israel's West Bank.
After conservative radio host Laura Ingraham played the "Hardball" clip to Huckabee on her radio program Thursday, the Fox News contributor had some choice words for the man that admits getting thrills up his leg when President Obama speaks.
HUCKABEE: Can you believe this guy? I mean, come on. Chris Matthews, he’s got to be one of the most incredibly interesting people who gets a job in the media today. And he’s calling me a lunatic because I happen to believe that you can’t take a country like Israel, with its tiny little strip of real estate, and continue to allow its enemies to sit on top of them.
Guess what? That doesn’t work. When you have this organization called the Palestinians, and they don’t even think that Israel should exist, and never have yet acknowledged their right to an existence, and you want to give more land to them so they can be even closer to your children’s playground so they can throw, shoot rockets at them, this is, this is really amazing.
But I tell you what, I want to say to Chris Matthews, “Chris, see a doctor. Do it quickly. You’re out of control. You’re off your meds. You absolutely must get help. And do it today.” Blog author's comments - Is it a shock to anyone why MSNBC has such low ratings? I never watch the network but I see the on-line clips of Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz. It is true; they are all out of control. At least they finally fired Keith Olbermann.
It is no surprise that the few viewers they have are the hard core left-wingers who actually believe what these people say and use MSNBC as their only source for political news.
Even though Huckabee is near the top in a few of the early polls as the GOP's candidate for 2012, I don't believe he can defeat Obama.
We have less than two years to come up with someone to make Obama a one term president and it has to happen. Obama has to be defeated and the GOP must win back control of the Senate and retain the House of Representatives.
Obama cannot be allowed to inflict any more damage on our country.
Palin Rebukes Barbara Bush, Family As 'Blue Bloods' After Remark
The Hill - Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) denounced the Bush family as "blue bloods" in an interview posted Wednesday and remarked that a mentality like theirs helped to cause the economic downturn.
Her comment came in response to a statement made by former first lady Barbara Bush during an interview with CNN's Larry King earlier this week. Asked for her take on Palin, Bush told King: "I think she's very happy in Alaska, and I hope she'll stay there."
Conservative radio host Laura Ingraham followed up with Palin, asking if she thought Bush's comment had been planned ahead of time. Palin had this to say:
"I don't want to sort of concede that we have to get used to this kind of thing because I think the majority of Americans don't want to put up with the blue bloods —and I say it with all due respect because I love the Bushes — but the blue bloods who want to pick and choose their winners instead of allowing competition to pick and choose the winners."
She then invoked the economic crisis to explain her point.
"They [blue bloods] kind of do some of this with the economic policies that were in place that got us into these economic woeful times, too," Palin said. "So I don't know if that kind of stuff is planned out but it is what it is. We deal with it, and we forge ahead and we keep doing what we're doing." Blog author's comments - Both Bush presidents were not good and neither were true conservatives. George W. Bush would not close our borders and signed on to the TARP bill, which I did not think was the right thing to do. Father and son lacked a backbone when it came to 'playing politics'. However I would have taken another eight years of George W. Bush in place of four years of Obama.
The Republican Establishment 'blue bloods' are used to having their way. They have never encountered someone like Sarah Palin. I do however have some doubt that she could win in 2012 but I would vote for her.
At this point in time who in the Republican Party do we have confidence in? We have two years to find someone who can win in 2012 and this is a must win for the GOP. If Obama continues with his policies and agenda during the lame duck session, he may defeat himself.
With the recent devastation experienced by the Democrats in the mid-term election, the Democrats don't know what to do about the Tea Party conservatives. There are also members of the GOP who do not take this group seriously.
What an absolutely stupid thing for Barbara Bush to say about Sarah Palin.
Christine O'Donnell Wins over Michael Castle in Delaware Senate Primary - Republican Establishment, Not Happy!
Karl Rove Rips Into Christine O'Donnell on Fox News Hannity, Right After Her Primary Win.
Sean Hannity defended O'Donnell staunchly, but was met with a litany of Rove criticism of O'Donnell.
Laura Ingraham Responds To Rove and the GOP: "They Are Missing The Tide, I Think It Is Far Bigger and Far More Profound Than They Understand"
It's "an out of touch elite who still don't understand the people of America, I think they look down on the tea party"
Ingraham:"She's [O'Donnell] not the perfect candidate, no she isn't, it's gonna be a tough race in Delaware but it's gonna be a lot tougher because Democrats are getting help from elite Republicans to defeat her."
Blog author's comments - I have always liked Karl Rove but after listening to his comments concerning Christine O'Donnell, I don't agree with him. I have also followed Laura Ingraham and thought she made some good points about the elite GOP.
Castle has been in office for over 15 years, but many times he votes with the Democrats. So...why does the Republican establishment want to continue with the same strategy that put us where we are now? With O'Donnell we may have a chance of putting a conservative in office.
I assume the GOP will continue to support the two female RINO's in Maine? They also support RINO John McCain from Arizona. These people are Republicans, but they certainly don't help in providing a movement towards a more conservative Republican party.
We held the office of President, the House and Senate and now we have nothing. If the GOP manages a victory in November, they had better change their mindset in a hurry or they will find themselves in the same position they are today.
I don't even want to think of what this country will be, if Obama wins in 2012 and serves two terms as the President.
