Friday, September 22, 2017

Former UN Ambassador Samantha Power
Attempted To Unmask More Than 260 Americans

Daily Caller -- Former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power tried to reveal the identity of more than 260 Americans in 2016, according to a Fox News report published Wednesday.

The ex-public official allegedly averaged more than one unmasking request for each formal working day, even continuing her spree towards the final days of the Obama administration.

The House Intelligence Committee’s unmasking probe named Power as a person of interest, along with former Obama national security advisers Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes, as well as former CIA Director John Brennan. Congressional investigators suspect that at least one of them may have tried to obtain the identities of Trump associates through intelligence reports.

The people of interest are all expected to testify before Congress in October, Fox News reports, but likely in classified sessions.

NSA Director Mike Rogers said earlier in March that 20 people at the NSA, along with a few officials at the FBI, the CIA and the U.S. Department of Justice, have the ability to “unmask” Americans whose communications are entangled with the communications of a foreigner.

In a letter to Dan Coats, the director of the office of national intelligence, California Rep. Devin Nunes, a Republican, wrote that investigators within the House Intelligence Committee “learned that one official, whose position had no apparent intelligence-related function, made hundreds of unmasking requests during the final year of the Obama Administration.” He did not specify, however, who the particular person is and what their proper jurisdiction and responsibility was due to their position.

Power’s lawyer, David Pressman, has said that “Ambassador Power was also a member of the National Security Council responsible for advising the President on the full-range of threats confronting the United States,” according to Fox News. But he denied any wrongdoing for his client, stating that “any insinuation that Ambassador Power was involved in leaking classified information is absolutely false.”

Nunes also contended that senior Obama administration officials, “offered remarkably few individualized justifications” for the unmasking requests, and added that some “were followed by anonymous leaks of those names to the media.”
Blog Author's Comments: Referencing Power’s lawyer, David Pressman - "But he denied any wrongdoing for his client, stating that “any insinuation that Ambassador Power was involved in leaking classified information is absolutely false." Susan Rice said something very similar - until the evidence proved her to (still) be a liar. And yet nothing has been done. Why did Ms. Power, the UN Ambassador, feel the need to unmask hundreds of people, up until Inauguration Day? That was no-doubt from orders of Obama, and this is what the current DOJ and American citizens should be concerned about, the abuse of power. On a side note, has anyone else noticed that Power always looks as if she is in pain? Yet when around Obama, appears as if she is in the presence of a God.

Meanwhile the faux-Russian narrative is still being manned by more democrat lawyers working for special counsel Robert Mueller while his best buddy, former FBI Director James Comey, writes his book and delivers a series of lectures at Howard University, a historically black college. President Trump is guilty of no crime involving the Russians. Robert Mueller and staff are looking to find something, anything, to pin on somebody who was at one time connected to Trump or knew him. This investigation is purely a waste of taxpayer's money and a witch hunt. The entire charade is because AG Jeff Sessions recused himself. He obviously did not believe he could handle his job. Trump should have ousted him months ago and brought on someone who is much tougher and stronger.

The DOJ will accomplish nothing with Sessions at the helm. He should resign and open the way for the president to appoint another AG. This Mueller investigation is only one element of a much larger plan to destabilize the Trump administration, all of which had the active participation and involvement of Lynch, Jarrett, Comey, and Obama. The integrity of the Justice system in this country depends on prosecutions brought on all the culprits involved. Most of the illegal things they did right in front of our faces and dared anyone to do anything about it. As a result, the weak republicans did nothing. I'm sure the stuff they did behind our backs is worse but unfortunately, unless we get some people in congress who aren't afraid of and are not part of the establishment, and will actually do their job, we will never know.

~ Links To More News

Sen. Republicans Accuse Democrat Leaders Of Playing Politics With Defense

Why Obama Really Spied On Trump

Woman Bullied By Local Officials Over Pro-Trump Signs

Is There A Cure For Spinal Frailty In Republicans?

Thursday, September 21, 2017

Trump's White House Chief Of Staff Allegedly Voted For Hillary Clinton...

GP -- Republican campaign consultant and Trump supporter Ed Rollins told Lou Dobbs that White House Chief of Staff John Kelly did not even vote for Trump. General John Kelly voted for Hillary Clinton.

John Kelly was appointed to replace White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus in July. Kelly reportedly filters the president’s news sources and controls the president’s schedule.

"Ed Rollins: At least what I’ve heard from sources inside who know Kelly, he is an honorable man and a good general. He didn’t vote for him. He voted for Hillary. So I don’t think basically he is a Trump supporter or ideologically a Trump supporter."

Via: Lou Dobbs Tonight

Blog Author's Comments: My first question is how does Ed Rollins know who John Kelly voted for? He was not in the voting booth with Kelly. If I were the president I would ask Kelly and this should have been part of his interview process prior to appointing him. Than again, this may simply be hearsay and part of the rumor mill that we are subjected to on a daily basis. But, would Rollins go on a televised news program and say this if he did not believe his source was reliable and could be believed?

Rollins said that Kelly was an honorable man. How many times have we been told that about numerous people, only to find out they were not at all? Comey and Mueller are both good examples. And why would a U.S. General vote for Hillary Clinton? Trump will never pass his campaign agenda and promises to the American people with swamp creatures in his administration’s positions of power. If our president wants to reward loyalty, he can make Sessions the Chief of Staff and replace him at the DOJ with someone who is much tougher than Jeff Sessions. I have believed this from the time Sessions was appointed.

~ Links To More News ~

Why President Trump's U.N. Speech Was A Triumph

Paul Manafort Responds To The FBI: 'Release The Tapes'

Kaepernick Disciples Demand NFL Dedicate Month To Racial Equality

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

Revelations Of Comey Wiretapping Manafort May Explain
The "Uncomfortable" March 20th Congressional Answer...

TLR -- Knowing that former Campaign Manager Paul Manafort was wiretapped by the Obama Administration via the FBI, James Comey, let’s take another look at Comey’s testimony.

New York Representative Elise Stefanik begins her March 20th, 2017, questioning by asking director Comey what are the typical protocols, broad standards and procedures for notifying the Director of National Intelligence, the White House and senior congressional leadership (aka the intelligence Gang of Eight), when the FBI has opened a counter-intelligence investigation.

The parseltongue response from Comey is a generalized reply (with uncomfortable body language) that notification of counter-intel investigations are discussed with the White House, and other pertinent officials, on a calendar basis, ie. “quarterly”.

With the statement that such counter-intel notifications happen “generally quarterly”, and against the backdrop that Comey stated in July of 2016 a counter-intel investigation began, Stefanik asks:

…”when did you notify the White House, the
DNI and congressional leadership”?

Watch an extremely uncomfortable Director James Comey lie by claiming there was no active DNI - which is entirely false - James Clapper was Obama’s DNI.

Blog Author's Comments: President Trump made the right move when he let Comey go. FBI Director James Comey needed to leave, he was too politicized and it was obvious that he was on the side of the Democrats, with the way he handled the Hillary Clinton email investigation. And what about Special Counsel Robert Mueller? Surely he is bumping into all of this in his investigation. Could there be a silver lining, or is he not allowed to follow the truth? I am not sure Mueller has even a passing acquaintance with ‘truth’ at this point in his life. I would like to think that he does. I would like to think a lot of things.

I remember when Mueller was first appointed, and everyone was saying what an honorable man he was. There were glowing reports of his personal biography. That was some time ago. He and Comey are long time co-workers and friends. It is hard to reconcile that Mueller, the guy who only hires Clinton cronies and NeverTrumpers to work on his investigative team, the team which positively has to know that the entire premise for their investigation is a fraud. And everybody said Comey was a ‘straight arrow’ too. So what people think they know about someone’s history does not seem to be indicative of future performance, at least when it comes to the ‘Swamp’ and those who venture into it.

And this is what bothers me about Attorney General Sessions. Just before the August recess, the Republican majority made a rule change to prevent Donald Trump - the president of their own party - from making recess appointments while Congress was out of town, perhaps plotting his destruction. It is not as complicated as it sounds. It appears - and don't doubt me - that any evidence about Russia was fabricated to get the FISA court to approve a wiretap on Manafort, Trump's one time campaign manager, and then of Trump towers.

Whoever fabricated that evidence will be able to answer many more questions. But, I do not believe we will ever know the identity of this person or the entire story, when it comes to the constant attempt of the destruction of the Trump presidency. It was also disgusting what was done to Manafort in his home and treating him like a lowlife criminal. I also question why now did this come out? Why are CNN and the N.Y. Times admitting that Trump Tower, hence Trump, was wiretapped? He said he was many months ago and everyone on the left laughed and said he did not know what he was talking about.

~ Links To More News ~

Paul Manafort Wiretapped - And Suddenly, Trump's Not So Crazy

Levin: 'Obama Had To Know' About FISA Warrant Applications

CNN Admits Trump Campaign Was Wiretapped, MSM Wrong

Tuesday, September 19, 2017

Crooked Hillary Considering Challenging The Election Results...

Truth Revolt -- In an interview with NPR’s Terry Gross on Monday, disgraced presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said she’s open to challenging the results of the 2016 election.

“I don't know if there's any legal, constitutional way to do that,” the former First Lady opined. “I don’t think we have a mechanism.”

However, citing “scholars” and “academics” who have asserted the possibility of such a history-reversing move, she seemed desperate to invalidate America’s choice by any means necessary. After predictably raising the question of Russia’s involvement in the outcome of the presidential race, the failed Democratic frontrunner then turned to a more bizarre excuse.

Hillary attempted to suggest another conspiratorial possibility by drawing a rather long and tenuous line of connections: a court recently overturned the Kenyan election, which was a project of Cambridge Analytica, the data company owned by the Mercer family, which was instrumental in the Brexit vote. A Brexit investigation is currently underway into “the use of data and the weaponization of information,” and Clinton therefore theorized that Mercer helped Donald Trump steal the Presidency.

And yet perhaps the most outlandish moment in the interview came when Hillary painted herself as a paragon of political selflessness:
“Let me just put it this way: if I had lost the popular vote but won the Electoral College and in my first day as president the intelligence community came to me and said, ‘The Russians influenced the election,’ I would've never stood for it. Even though it might've advantaged me, I would've said, ‘We've got to get to the bottom of this.’ I would've set up an independent commission with subpoena power and everything else.”
Suuure. A beacon of integrity and honesty, folks; that’s the Hillary Clinton we all know and rejected last November.
Blog Author's Comments: Hillary Clinton is in complete denial about her own failings, and totally obsessed with herself. She is the accurate face of the Democrat Party. Clinton is a sad, delusional woman, old beyond her years. She said “I don't know if there's any legal, constitutional way to do that,” that has never stopped her before. And she wants to do away with the Electoral College, I wonder why? Nine months after Trump was sworn in as President is too late to challenge the election results, it will never happen.

The results were not even close, Trump 304 electoral votes, Hillary 232. Don't even bother with the claimed popular vote. Hillary, every minute you keep this up increases the odds that your corruption will actually come back to bite you and the Democrats. And she said prior to the election, failing to accept the election results would undermine American democracy. She is a great leader and representative of the entire Democrat Party. Yes Clinton, go ahead and challenge it. We will finally know how many illegals actually voted for you.

~ Links To More News & Videos ~

Former Amb. John Bolton - Trump's Speech To UN Best Of His Presidency

Netanyahu Praises Trump's U.N. Address: A Bold And Courageous Speech

At UN, Trump Warns U.S. May Have To 'Totally Destroy' North Korea

President Trump Addresses The United Nations Today (Full Speech)

Trump's UN Speech Was An
'In-Your-Face' To So Many People

Monday, September 18, 2017

Political Videos & Links To Political News...

Rex Tillerson Interview
CBS's 'Face The Nation'

Trump Will Be Pushing For Reform And America First At United Nations

St. Louis Rioters Storm Mall, Chant 'No Justice, No Profits'

Obama's Iran Deal Bears Fruit - For Hezbollah - What Could Go Wrong?

CNN Interview With Dana Bash
And U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley

Levin: Susan Rice Lied. Is The GOP Going To Do Anything About It?

American Bombers Swoop In On Kim In Show Of Force

Cultural Cleansing Rolls On As Dallas School District May Dump Ben Franklin

H.R. McMaster To Fox News Wallace:
'False Report' That Trump Is Reconsidering His
Decision To Pull Out Of Paris Climate Agreement

It Just Never Ends, Hobby Lobby Accused Of Selling 'Racist' Decorations

Iran, North Korea, And The Bomb

NY Times Slammed, Said Boy Mowing WH Lawn Is Bad Signal On Child Labor

John Bolton: On What Will
President Say At UN On Tuesday

Sunday, September 17, 2017

"What Kind Of Animal Attacks A Disabled Veteran?" Waters And
Tim Pool Discuss Portland's Antifa And Generally All Of The Members

Blog Author's Comments: Antifa is an Un-American domestic terrorist group that's made up of weaklings and mental rejects of the country who found unity and courage as a group. They do not protest they riot. It is extremely easy for a group of them to attack a few people, for whatever reason they find fault with them. They are seeking to destroy America and violence against them should be encouraged.

Our military takes an oath to defend our country against all enemies, foreign and domestic. These are domestic enemies, and it's time to put them down. That man in the wheelchair served his country and deserves to be treated with respect. The politicians obviously don't have the guts to take them on and the cops have their hands tied with the traitorous stand down orders. In general Antifa organizations are considered far-left entities. And as one would expect, they are generally opposed to far-right ideologies.

Saturday, September 16, 2017

Sore Loser Hillary Just Won't Let It Go, Still Raging At Trump...

Downtrend -- The pathetic spectacle of Hillary Clinton’s return to public life this week to promote her tome of trauma What Happened? continues to unfold as Americans get a nice, long look at the disaster that they barely avoided had she actively campaigned in the Rust Belt.

Fawning media hosts have lobbed softballs at Mrs. Clinton during a series of interviews in which she was given wide latitude to attack those who did her wrong and to rage about that terrible man President Donald Trump.

On Wednesday, it was Anderson Cooper and Thursday it was Rachel Maddow, a prized interview that will have the loopy lesbian gushing for days.

Clinton railed against the man who beat her like a dog who she called a “clear and present” danger to the “institutions of democracy” – a description that would better seem to fit her and her ongoing act as the leader of a government in exile.

According to The Hill “Clinton: Trump poses ‘clear and present danger’ to US”:

Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton said Thursday she believes President Trump and some of the people who surround him “pose a clear and present danger” to the U.S.

“I’m hoping that on the really big issues there’s enough authority to be able to restrain and contain the president. That’s what we all have to hope because I think this president and some of the people around him pose a clear and present danger to our country,” Clinton told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow.

“Domestically to our institutions of democracy, our self governance, our rule of law. Internationally in so many ways because of the unpredictability, the fact that there is no strategic plan, there’s just a reactive, emotional, visceral kind of behavior,” she said.

In the interview promoting her new book, Clinton argued that it is imperative for Trump’s staff to “contain” him due to consequential decisions he will have to make as president.

“I think going forward, any effort to try to contain him, which I know some in the White House and in the broader administration have been trying to do, is especially important when it comes to consequential decisions,”
she said.

The star struck Maddow didn’t even have the courtesy to offer Mrs. Clinton a cheese platter with all of that whine.

What we now have is a renegade former First Lady, U.S. Senator, Secretary of State and failed presidential candidate who is being given nightly forums to call for the undermining of the legitimately elected President of the United States.

Not that this hasn’t been the case the entire time with Hillary slithering around in the background and feeding the flames of the so-called Resistance, it’s just all out in the open now.

Blog Author's Comments: Clinton said President Trump and some members of his cabinet “pose a clear and present danger" to the United States. Yet she is the one who wants to chuck the Electoral College and I wonder why now? Liberals are not only stupid, they're dangerous. Like selling uranium to the Russians as Hillary Clinton did, but none of the media will address this to her face. She is clearly guilty of a great deal of outright criminal activity.

She has lapsed into full psychosis. She has been First Lady, Senator from New York, Secretary of State. Forget all that, watching her pathetic performance on this tour should cause people to reflect on what life would be like if she had won. This tour will define her 'legacy'. Clinton blames everyone but the progressive Marxist in the mirror, herself. We dodged a bullet on this one. And Hillary Clinton cannot let go of the fantasy of her being president.

How Stupid The 'Smartest Woman
In The World' Hillary Clinton, Really Is

Friday, September 15, 2017

Ann Coulter: No Amnesty Is A Good Amnesty...

Breitbart -- Donald Trump is being told that amnesty for “Dreamers,” or DACA recipients, will only apply to a small, narrowly defined group of totally innocent, eminently deserving illegal immigrants, who were brought to this country “through no fault of their own” as “children.” (Children who are up to 36 years old.)

Every syllable of that claim is a lie, and I can prove it.

To see how DACA will actually work, let’s look at another extremely limited amnesty that was passed in 1986.

Farmers wanted temporary guest-worker permits for their cheap labor, so that they could continue pretending that the Industrial Revolution never happened and refuse to mechanize. (And, boy, did that work! We haven’t heard a peep about “crops rotting in the fields” since then.)

The agricultural amnesty was supposed to apply to — at most — 350,000 illegal aliens. It would be available only to illegals who were currently in the country doing the back-breaking farm work that no American would do. Without them, crops would wither on the vine. They were saving us from starvation!

Talk about deserving. Are any Dreamers saving us from starvation?

But instead of guest-worker permits, then-Rep. Charles Schumer — from the lush farmland of Brooklyn — decided to grant full amnesty to any illegals who had done farm work for at least 90 days in the previous year.

That’s pretty restrictive, isn’t it?

In the end, “up to 350,000 farm workers” turned into 1.3 million.

Oh well, what are you going to do? No use worrying — let’s just move forward and get all these people voter registration cards!

This innocent little amnesty for a small, clearly defined group of illegals quickly became amnesty for anyone who applied. The same thing will happen with any other amnesty, no matter how strictly the law is written. (And it won’t be written strictly.)

In the first few years of the agricultural amnesty, internal Immigration and Naturalization Service statistics showed that 888,637 legalization applications were fraudulent. According to immigration agents, “farm workers” stated in their interviews that cotton was purple or that they had pulled cherries from the ground.

Of the 888,637 fraudulent applications, guess how many our government approved. Answer: More than 800,000.

The agricultural amnesty was so carefully administered that not one, but TWO of the 1993 World Trade Center bombers were in this country because of it.[...]

For two decades after the 1986 amnesty, the federal courts were tied up with dozens of class-action lawsuits brought on behalf of illegal aliens — regular illegal aliens, farm worker illegal aliens and still-in-Mexico illegal aliens — challenging every aspect of the law.

Is that how American tax dollars should be spent? On endless litigation, brought by America-hating activists on behalf of people who have no right to be in our country and decided by Democrat-appointed judges? (Who are also America-hating activists.)

And when their work is done, there will be a lot more Democrat-appointed judges because there will be a lot more Democrats.

Lawyers sued over everything — the absence of Creole interpreters, the requirement that illegals have proof of prior farm work and the rare denials of amnesty. Congress desperately tried passing laws that would prevent courts from hearing these cases — all to no avail. Left-wing lawyers just had to pick the right judge, and they won.

In 2005 — nearly 20 years after the 1986 amnesty — the Ninth Circuit was still granting amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens who claimed they had been unfairly denied because they were not in the country for the first amnesty. Seriously.

No matter how the law is written, as long as anyone is eligible for amnesty, everybody’s getting amnesty.

President Trump is the last president who will ever have a chance to make the right decision on immigration. After this, it’s over. The boat will have sailed.

If he succeeds, all the p@ssy-grabbing and Russia nonsense will burn off like a morning fog. He will be the president who saved the American nation, its character, its sovereignty, its core identity. But if he fails, Donald Trump will go down in history as the man who killed America.
Read entire column...
Blog Author's Comments: Amnesty for all is not what Americans voted for. Any talk of amnesty is a deal breaker with the American people. We already have rules concerning people who attempt to or come here illegally, they are breaking the law. Ann Coulter is correct as usual. Hopefully, Trump is trolling the Democrats.

He has become frustrated with many members of his own party and their inability to do anything. He cannot do it all by himself. He does not and many of us don't want his election and total control of the government to go to waste. The Republican Party may not have control for quite a while if there are not some very positive results and many of the President's campaign promises fulfilled.

Many executive orders, increased ICE activity, military support, and the new Justice of the Supreme Court, none of those would have played out the way they did if Trump wasn't president. I would also argue that economic and job gains are also because of him. But, there many items on his to-do list that have not been addressed because of the GOP leadership and many party members.

It's the enemy within that is hardest to fight. The homegrown Marxists will never stop their endeavor to push us Left. The bottom line is that Trump has to say no to any amnesty and find a way to build the wall. I believe in Trump's word but DACA must be dead and buried and the Dreamers deported.

~ Links To More News & Audio ~

House Agrees To $1.6 Billion For Border Wall

Mueller Could Destroy The Last Faith In The Justice System

Trump Demands Apology From ESPN After Being Called A 'White Supremacist'

What If Trump Behaving Nice To Democrats Is
About Furthering Along The Prospects Of Tax Reform

Thursday, September 14, 2017

Marxist Leaning Pope Francis Warning To
Global Warming Skeptics: History Will Judge You

GP -- Pope Francis lashed out at global warming skeptics, saying, “History will judge you!” for not believing in global warming junk science.

Pope Francis said Hurricanes Harvey and Irma were “evidence” of global warming climate change.

Good grief! This guy is a disaster. Top scientists couldn’t predict where Hurricane Irma was going to hit ground but this pope believes in Global Warming predictions.

The BBC Reported:

"Pope Francis has warned history will judge world leaders who do not act as he blasted climate change skeptics in the wake of Hurricanes Irma and Harvey.

The pontiff said the recent storms meant the effects of climate change could be seen “with your own eyes”.

There have been four major Atlantic hurricanes in less than three weeks.

But US Environmental Protection Agency head Scott Pruitt said it was an inappropriate time to discuss what role climate change may have played.

Mr. Pruitt – who has previously said he “would not agree” carbon dioxide is a primary contributor to global warming – told CNN current speculation “on the cause and effect of the storm… is misplaced”.

Pope Francis frequently speaks about the horrors of global warming.

Blog Author's Comments: Francis is a pope who doesn't spread the gospel but instead globalism and Islam. The "progressives" have infiltrated all of our institutions. Pope Francis is doing to the Catholic Church what Obama tried to do to America. This liberal Democrat who is called the Pope, I no longer pay any attention to what he says or preaches, the liberal activist won't shut up, he is a globalist not a religious leader. History will also judge you, Pope Francis. Please address liturgical abuses, wayward priests, waning faith and morals, the weather is not your job.

He should use the wealth of the church to fight the liberal scam of climate change. Many taxpayers don't want to help fund this, which is yet another plus that Hillary Clinton was not elected president. The Catholic Church's original model worked a lot better for them. In the old days, the clergy got a classical education, the serfs didn't, so the serfs looked to the church for enlightenment, since, as they were reminded by the clergy, they needed to be told what to think. It ensured compliance and kept the pesky questions to a minimum. Now, the balance of the Clergy, from what I've observed, has a universally Leftist world-view, and the former serfs, now are at least a better educated middle and upper class than they used to be, and don't like being talked down to by the Pope and his comrades.

This is 80% of the reason that the pews are empty, and what happens when affirmative action strikes the pope-selection process. Francis was elected because the pope selectors figured it was high time that they elected a socialist from Argentina. This imposter is a disgrace to the Papacy. If anyone will be "judged by history" it is going to be him, and not in a good way. This guy is more interested in being a rock star than in running his church. It sounds to me that his smacking his head on the pope-mobile a few days ago has caused more damage than was previously known.

~ Links To More News ~

Trump: 'No Deal' Yet With Pelosi, Schumer On DACA, Wall Will Be Built

Trump Urges Congress To 'Move Fast' On Tax Reform

Judge Considers Defying Trump Over Arpaio Pardon

Wednesday, September 13, 2017

Sports Media Throws Cold Water On Cleveland
Indians' Winning Streak Because Of 'Racist Logo'

USA Today -- The Cleveland Indians have been having quite a season. Yet, despite winning an amazing 19 games in a row, the sports media cannot help themselves, from ruining all the fun by bringing Chief Wahoo, the team’s 70-year-old “racist” logo.

After toppling the Los Angeles Dodgers for best record, the Indians have realized an 19-game winning streak which is only one game away from the 20-game record set by the Oakland A’s in 2002. The Tribe just might have the opportunity to hit that magic 21, too, as they next face the Detroit Tigers.[...]

The Tigers are already mathematically eliminated from division contention, so they have not been having the best season, to put it mildly.

Needless to say, Indians fans and commentators have been on Cloud Nine for the last few months.

However, even as the excitement builds to a fever pitch, leave it to the liberal sports media to find a way to throw cold water on the fun.

Ted Berg of USA Today felt compelled to jump to his keyboard to proclaim the Cleveland Indians’ winning streak essentially null and void because the team still has its cartoon Indian, Chief Wahoo, as a mascot.

In a Sept. 11 editorial, Berg exclaims, “Everything about the red-hot Cleveland Indians is awesome except their very racist logo.”

Despite Cleveland having “the best record in the Majors,” and asking readers, “How fun is this team,” Berg is sour because of Chief Wahoo.

“It’s all extremely dope,” Berg says, trying and failing to sound cool. He continues, “…and watching the Indians right now would be fully and exhaustively dope were it not for the nagging little issue of the extremely racist logo they insist on wearing on their caps on most games: Chief Wahoo.”

Berg recounts that the team has made a few moves to eventually eliminate the long-standing logo in favor of the new block “C” logo, but he clearly feels the team isn’t moving fast enough. Berg even finds it “alarming” that the team has worn Chief Wahoo for most of its televised games and during the pre-season.

Berg concludes, admitting that no one wears Chief Wahoo gear with hatred, but he still feels morally superior to those who like their team’s decades old mascot:
Yes, the Indians have worn Wahoo for a while now, and yes, if you grew up in Cleveland you may have done so while wearing Wahoo gear without a shred of hatred in your heart toward anybody. But clinging stubbornly to its presence on caps and uniforms, as the Indians have, or trying to justify it as anything other than a grim relic of intolerance means taking a stand on the wrong side of history. We move forward.

Blog Author's Comments: And after Chief Wahoo is done away with, racism and intolerance will never be problems ever again? The left attempts to kill everything it touches that it does not like or agree with. What is racist about saying Indians are winners? Ted Berg of USA Today could probably give us many reasons because he is a liberal, and isn't everyone that writes for that paper liberal? A sure sign of a cretin is when you meet someone that fights a fight that isn't their own and the people that potentially could have a reason to fight it, aren't fighting. American Indians, which are not actually "native Americans" by the way, apparently don't care about this. They have their lives to live and other things to think and worry about.

Berg cries and whines too much about something he should not be writing about. Unless one has been directly impacted in their years of life by outrageous forms of racism, one should not receive any sympathy. You'll receive no sympathy here for what happened three or four generations ago, move on. Ted Berg is simply looking to stir the pot of racism, while throwing a damper on a sports event which makes some people feel good, as if we need more leftists doing the stirring.

~ Links To More News ~

Congress Plots To Sneak Legal Immigration Hike Into Spending Bill

Trump's Promise To Cut Government Jobs Realized

Black Female ESPN Commentator Called Trump White Supremacist Keeps Job

Tuesday, September 12, 2017

Hurricane Irma Looters Busted After Getting Filmed By TV Crew...

NY Post -- Fort Lauderdale cops busted nine people caught on camera looting a Florida shoe store amid the chaos of Hurricane Irma on Sunday.

The arrests came after local TV station WPLG recorded the crooks entering the Simon’s Sportswear shop on West Sunrise Boulevard through a broken window and running off with merchandise.

The suspects also targeted the nearby Cash America pawn shop, according to the Fort Lauderdale Police Department.

“Going to prison over a pair of sneakers is a fairly bad life choice,” Police Chief Rick Maglione said in a statement posted on Twitter.

“Stay home and look after your loved ones and be thankful they are safe.”

Earlier in the day, the department posted mug shots of two men charged in other hurricane-related crimes.

“Can’t say we didn’t warn you…Ryan Cook and Max Saintvil each face 6 counts of burglary from overnight #HurricaneIrma,” the department tweeted.

Blog Author's Comments: During the aftermath of a hurricane you can never have too many 'Air Jordan’s'. It was heard said, that the sneakers were needed to out run the hurricane. In other news, not a single bookstore was looted. Looting during a state of emergency is a no-bond felony in Florida, have a pleasant stay in jail looters. This is just another facet of Barrack Hussein Obama's wealth redistribution. There's a huge factor involved in this, having one parent or none at all. Two parent homes are the solution to many of society's ills.

I say that these looters are lucky; the owners of the shop could have been guarding their store, hoping to get through the storm, but with 12 gauge shotguns within easy reach. If a few shots were fired the word would get out not to 'loot that store.' It's pretty sad that during a state of emergency, one leaves their shop and these people are stealing as much stuff as they can carry. Every picture I saw showed black people as the folks that were doing the looting. It only takes a few to give the impression to many, as to who is doing the majority of crime in America.

~ Links To More News ~

SCOTUS Grants President Trump's Request To Lift Travel Order Restrictions

Ret. Gen. Kelly Hits Back At Democrat Who Called Him A 'Disgrace To Uniform'

Jobless Kaepernick Now Funding Anti-Trump Illegal Alien Activists

Monday, September 11, 2017

September 11, 2001 Is A Day All Americans Should Never Forget...

What we learned on September 11 is that the unthinkable is now thinkable in the world. – John Ashcroft

Sunday, September 10, 2017

Clinton: Trump's Campaign Was Successful
In Comforting 'Millions Of White People'

Free Beacon -- During the interview, which was taped Friday, Pauley inquired about what went wrong in Clinton's surprising defeat and what derailed the campaign that was "supposed to make history" by electing her the first female president of the United States.

Clinton said that stereotypes, sexism, and misogyny played a role in why people could not wrap their brains around electing a female president into office. In the interview, Clinton said she knew she was going to have to "have to work extra hard to make women and men feel comfortable with the idea of a woman president."

“He was quite successful in referencing the nostalgia that would give hope, comfort, settle grievances, for millions of people who were upset about gains that were made by others,” Clinton said of Trump’s campaign.

“What you’re saying is millions of white people,” host Jane Pauley clarified.

“Millions of white people,” Clinton confirmed. “Yeah, millions of white people.”

Clinton also addressed her infamous remarks last year that half of Trump's supporters were bigots who were part of a "basket of deplorables," saying she regretted handing Trump a political gift but also saying a "large number of people" didn't care about Trump's behavior.

Blog Author's Comments: Hillary Clinton said a "large number of people" didn't care about Trump's behavior. There were also a huge number of people that did not care about Hillary's behavior and have not for many years, which is one of the many reasons she lost. When will this person ever shut up, blame herself and go away. She is still playing the victim card. And she will continue playing that card as long as she can make more money with it while charging for her interviews and book promotions. Democrats only have so much money and if she is tapping into it, so the DNC gets even less than they need - so much the better.

She also said she had to work 'extra hard' during the campaign. But she did not work 'extra hard’; there were a few states that she did not even visit. Maybe if she had the election would have worked out differently for her. She obviously thought – after she and her people screwed Bernie Sanders over – that this time the presidency would surely be hers and did not have to do nearly the campaign work that President Trump did. I and many millions of Trump voters are extremely glad she was wrong. Most thinking Americans should feel lucky that Trump came along when he did. I really don’t believe anyone else on the Right would have defeated her. She and her liberal followers will never get over her loss, I see proof of this on a daily basis.

Saturday, September 9, 2017

Attorney Clevenger: FBI Does Not Want People To
Know How Badly They Covered Up Hillary Clinton Scandal

GP -- "Ty Clevenger: Originally I thought there was some Obama holdover in the FBI that was trying to cover this up. But as you know last week Senator Graham and Senator Grassley released a letter indicating that the former FBI Director James Comey had already decided to exonerate Mrs. Clinton before she was even interviewed. And so at this point I believe the FBI is trying to cover its own rear-end. I think they know this thing is going to look terrible for them. They deep-sixed this. They white-washed it. And they don’t want the documents coming out showing how badly they covered it up…"

Investigative Reporter Ty Clevenger:
FBI Is Trying To Cover Its Own Rear End

Blog Author's Comments: Is there any agency in our government that has not been corrupted? It really got out of hand with Obama, Holder, Lynch, Rice, Jarrett and Rhodes; just to name a few, with many more still hiding in government. But, within the FBI it was its leadership. There have to be many agents who know what Comey and his people are and did, but are keeping their heads down to stay on the payroll and wait for their pension.

In the case of Hillary they had to be faking bogus investigations. Added to the above level of corruption is Comey's leak of his conversation with President Trump, which he leaked after the president fired him. And he leaked it, by his own admission, to hopefully have the DOJ appoint a special counsel, which it did, appointing his mentor and longtime friend, Robert Mueller.

You can't make this stuff up. Mueller's clear cut conflicts of interests should have compelled him to recuse himself. He didn't and who knows how long the 'witch hunt' will go on? I believe that Mueller and his team of Clinton lawyers are well beyond the alleged "Russian collusion" and are delving into places within the Trump White House and personnel finances where it should not be. Mueller may have opened himself up to charges of bias and should be disbarred for misconduct and ethics violations. It's a banana republic investigation, worthy of Argentina or Venezuela.

So many in DC were terrified of Obama's skin color. Fear of being labeled a racist meant that he, his administration and cronies, could get away with anything. And the liberal media thought it was great. Now that he is gone, some of the fear is also gone. But, the media is still carrying on as usual with their deceit and downright lies and made up stories. What so many still within government and some that have been replaced, are now thinking about is covering up what they let happen. I will forever want to see ‘crooked’ Hillary Clinton prosecuted for even half of what she has thus far escaped from.

~ Links To More News ~

Bannon On 60 Minutes: Ryan And McConnell 'Trying To Nullify 2016 Election'

The Leftwing Media's Dangerous And Divisive Lie

Hillary's Tour Of Petty Proves She Cares More About Herself Than Her Party

Trump DOJ Says No Way On Revisiting IRS Targeting Of Conservatives

Mallard Fillmore Cartoon by Bruce Tinsley

Friday, September 8, 2017

Hillary Clinton Unloads On Democrats In Memoir, Angering Some...

Breitbart -- Hillary Clinton is unloading on Democrats in her new memoir, angering some Democratic Party officials in the process.

Excerpts from Clinton’s 2016 campaign memoir, What Happened, which is set to be released next week, show Clinton venting her frustrations about working with some of the Democratic Party’s most powerful figures leading up to her eventual defeat to President Trump.

In one passage, Clinton says former President Obama put her in a “straightjacket” when he told her to refrain from attacking her rival, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), in the Democratic primary over fears it would divide the Democratic Party heading into the general election.

Clinton wrote in another passage that she did not like that former Vice President Joe Biden told her that she did not adequately address how the Democratic Party would help the middle class.

Clinton also mocked Sanders’ policy proposals as “pie-in-the-sky” endeavors and called his supporters sexist.

The former 2016 Democratic presidential nominee also complained that Sanders’ attacks during the primary did “lasting damage” to her shot at winning the general election, even going so far as to accuse Sanders of aiding Trump.

Sanders responded to Clinton’s criticism Wednesday by simply saying Democrats need to “look forward, not backward.” But others in the party have not been so forgiving of her statements.

“The best thing she could do is disappear,” one former Clinton fundraiser and surrogate who played an active role at the convention told the Hill. “She’s doing harm to all of us because of her own selfishness. Honestly, I wish she’d just shut the f— up and go away.”

Clinton has blamed several people and groups for her 2016 election loss, including former FBI Director James Comey, the Russians, the press, Obama, and the Democratic National Committee. But what remains to be seen in this book is whether she takes any responsibility for losing the election.
Blog Author's Comments: Clinton is the biggest egotist of this century. With her, it is always the blame game, she never does anything wrong. Hillary have you ever said the words, 'my fault’? I'm disappointed that ungrateful Hillary didn't have the decency to mention me by name in her book. I had something to do with making her being a loser, me and 62 million or more of my closest friends. She has no empathy for the average American and I have no empathy for her. Her ongoing meltdown is highly entertaining.

I would pay a few dollars to get a video of her when she found out President Trump went over 270 Electoral votes, it had to be hilarious. Poor Bill Clinton must have moved into their guest house or a hotel for a few days. Yet, the mainstream media will always protect her and her family. The Democrats had to have been really daft to push her as their candidate with the reputation the Clintons had and will always have. I wonder who advised her to write this book and do more complaining; whoever it was I thank you. She is making herself and the Democrats look even worse. Don't go away Hillary, just keep talking until at least 2020.

~ Links To More News ~

Trump Dumps, Do-Nothing Congress

Paul Ryan's Already-Shaky Status With Colleagues Takes Another Hit

Associated Press Now Refers To Illegal Aliens As 'Undocumented Citizens'

Now Lefties Want To Throw 'Climate Deniers' In Prison

Thursday, September 7, 2017

Pittsburgh Steelers Legend Says Teammates
Would Have Gone Old School On Anthem Protestors

Jack Lambert - Pittsburgh Steelers All-Time Great Linebacker

Down Trend -- Over the years the NFL has really lost a lot as it shifted from a game with players who were real men into a multi-billion-dollar entertainment industry where the quarterbacks may as well be wearing skirts.

Not only has the on the field product sucked out loud thanks to endless replays, game stoppages, arcane rules and lousy officiating, but there just isn’t any American pride exhibited by far too many of the pampered multi-millionaire players who have no empathy towards those who have to go out and work a real job to earn their daily bread.

This would especially be the case with the national anthem protesting crybabies like Colin Kaepernick and his disciples, a cult if there ever was one as well as one that threatens the financial future of the league itself with mounting boycotts.

Perhaps I am old but I never liked all of the ass-shaking, show-boating, ESPN play of the day style of nonsense and back in the day, a guy like Ray Nietzsche or Dick Butkus would never have allowed that style of exhibitionism. Locker rooms policed themselves whenever it became necessary which wasn’t often because players respected the flag, the country and understood their NFL privilege.

That being said, an interesting – and soon to be controversial – comment has been made by Pittsburgh Steelers Hall of Famer Franco Harris on the national anthem protesters. The members of the Steel Curtain defense would have made sure that the first time that Kaepernick took a knee, that he would have been wearing his ass for a hat.

According to the Washington Times “Steelers legend Franco Harris says teammates would’ve quashed national anthem protests”:
NFL great Franco Harris says there is no way national anthem protests inspired by former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick would have caught on in his era.

The four-time Super Bowl champion and man known for the “Immaculate Reception” sat down for a wide-ranging interview with Mediaite’s John Ziegler over the Labor Day weekend. The two talked about the racial strife of the late 1960s and his time at Penn State when today’s Kaepernick-inspired protests came up.

“When [a professional] puts that suit on, it’s not just about him and his position and the things that he wants to back and wants to believe in, because the team has to come first,” Mr. Harris said during the podcast. “If he wants to make statements, make a position, then that’s fine. Go do that. There’s no reason why you couldn’t do that after practice on another platform than doing it with his suit on at the stadium. […] That was his personal position that he wanted to take.”

The NFL Hall of Fame fullback then said that team leaders would have quashed any national anthem protests before Steelers head coach Chuck Noll needed to get involved.

“I don’t think it would have been Chuck,” Mr. Harris said Sunday. “I think that there would have been two guys on our team […] who would have said, ‘Hey.’ […] We had two of the meanest guys in football, who I think would’ve dealt with it that way, and that would’ve been Joe Greene and Jack Lambert.”
Click Link For Jack Lambert Tribute Video

Click Link For "Mean Joe" Greene Highlights Video

Yes indeed, the prima donnas and social justice warriors in today’s locker rooms would benefit greatly were a couple of guys like Jack Lambert and Mean Joe Greene been around to offer them a “lesson” in the proper way to conduct themselves.
Blog Author's Comments: Colin Kaepernick refusing to stand for the National Anthem. A sad commentary and a disgrace that needs to be immediately corrected. Back when football was played by men with passion about the game, Franco Harris, Jack Lambert, Mean Joe Greene and so many others, until approximately 10-12 years ago.

The NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has his hand in so many places within the league where it does not belong. He is ruining the game. If it were up to him the NFL would become a flag football league. I do agree "the prima donnas and social justice warriors in today’s locker rooms would benefit greatly were a couple of guys like Jack Lambert and Mean Joe Greene been around to offer them a “lesson” in the proper way to conduct themselves."

Colin Kaepernick had no problem taking the millions he has made playing in the NFL. But now he has no contract because he has no talent and no one wants him.

~ Political Audio ~

If Republicans 'Bite The Bullet' For 3 Months,
Democrats Wouldn't Stand A Prayer For 25 Years

Wednesday, September 6, 2017

Sudden Rebranding: 'Elizabeth Warren's
Christian Faith Extremely Deep, Authentic'...

Truth Revolt -- Democrats are scrambling ahead of the 2018 elections in hopes they can gain a leg up on power in the country. The party is going through a rebranding process since it can’t seem to win in Trump’s America. The media is doing what it can to help in that process, as evidenced by The Boston Globe’s rekindled love for Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

It wasn’t that long ago that The Globe went to bat for Warren, backing up her claim that she is Native American. The paper touted that she was 1/32nd Cherokee, even though that was totally debunked, making retractions necessary.

Now, The Globe is stepping up to the plate again by pumping her Christian faith which up to this point in her political career has barely been mentioned. As Legal Insurrection noted, the title of the piece was more general, “Religion is constant part of Elizabeth Warren’s life,” but The Globe’s Twitter promotion got straight to the point:

Who knew?

But it wasn’t easy for The Globe to churn out this narrative. It was a hard lemon to squeeze:
Much less well known is Warren’s relationship with God.

The senator’s personal religious views are part of her life that few if any of her supporters or detractors think of when they contemplate the Massachusetts lawmaker, who has built a national reputation on the strength of her populism and is on many political observers’ short list of likely 2020 White House contenders.

But religious leaders who have known her since her first run for public office say her Christian faith is a constant, if quiet, presence in her life, that it is deep and authentic, and informs her work as a senator.
Just take a moment to reflect on those politicians (we dare argue are mostly Republican) whose Christian faith is so integral to their lives. They talk about it… a lot. Warren’s, though, is much more elusive:
Warren’s religious background is a minor theme in the two political books she published since taking office…

Back in Boston, Warren, who declined to be interviewed for this story, doesn’t have a home church she regularly attends, but she frequently visits a variety of houses of worship — including many African-American churches — around the state, particularly in Boston, according to local religious leaders and aides.
Strange. If Warren’s faith is so interwoven into her life, why doesn’t she have a home church? And why, pray tell, would a Democratic senator go out of her way to be seen at black churches? Those red flags are lost amongst The Globe’s apologia.

We sure wouldn’t want to lead the witness here, but it appears as though Warren’s “Christianity” is politically expedient but The Globe is proclaiming a different gospel.

That's because anything goes when there are elections to win — Native American or Jesus, whatever it takes.

Blog Author's Comments: Warren is a loose cannon. If she is as good as the Democrats can field, that is favorable news for the Republicans. Nothing out of any Democratic Party politician's mouth is true or sincere. The list of deceit, lies, corruption, and violence is long and proves Democrats have a fundamental or integral problem. Elizabeth Warren will try anything to get the liberal and low-information cretins to vote for her.

The corrupt Marxist, pro-Islam, anti-Christian democrats continue to do what they always do before elections, lie about what and who they really are. I do hope the left keeps pushing Warren into the spotlight. She's a gift to the right. This sudden shift is quite easy to understand. Somewhere, some political consultant determined in some focus group that this "Christian Values" thing (whatever that means) was a good hook to grab a few votes in 2018.

Warren doesn't need to believe any of "that religious stuff" just continue saying the buzz words over and over and that demographic is locked in. If you believe these claims about her then you probably still believe she is 1/32 Cherokee Indian and that Hillary has always told the truth. What a sham and one that is sure to continue the fake news legacy for the media. Warren's faith in whatever religion she is involved in, and is as deep and genuine as that of Barack Hussein Obama.

~ Links To More News ~

Time For A Full-Scale Investigation Of Hillary, Obama And Comey

Nikki Haley: Trump Has Grounds To Declare Iran In Violation Of Nuclear Deal

Feinstein Wants Protections For Dreamers Included In Hurricane Relief Bill

Revelation From Hillary Clinton's Book: Men Treated Me Badly & Made Me Lose

Tuesday, September 5, 2017

Paul Ryan In 2014: Executive Amnesty Is 'Blatantly Unconstitutional'

Daily Caller -- House Speaker Paul Ryan said last week that he doesn’t think President Trump should end DACA, although in 2014 he called it “blatantly unconstitutional.”

“I actually don’t think he should do that, and I believe that this is something that Congress has to fix,” Ryan said of Trump’s decision to end the Obama executive order that protects undocumented children.

However, in a 2014 interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity, Ryan sang a different tune.

Hannity asked Ryan what he would do to stop Obama if he were to “follow through on his threat for executive amnesty.

“First of all, it’s unconstitutional so we’re already going through the court system on other unconstitutional executive orders that [Obama] has worked on and we would add this to the pile,” Ryan said at the time.

“If he were to do that, by the way, he would put millions of people in legal limbo, poison the well for Congress, and do something that’s so blatantly unconstitutional so we’re telling the administration don’t even think about doing this,” he asserted.

“If you want to change a law, then go to Congress,” Ryan said. “You can’t unilaterally write a law as the executive.”


Blog Author's Comments: I certainly would like to see Ryan primaried out, the next time he's up for re-election. But, many of the incumbents pool their money and outspend their Conservative challengers. Democrat Party oozes from every pore of Ryan's body. Whatever President Trump wants to do, Rep. Ryan is against it but that is not a surprise to me. Ryan has been a Never-Trumper since President Trump began his campaign to be the Republican Party’s nominee. Would someone tell Ryan it's called enforcing existing immigration laws?

Republican leadership can't figure out what is constitutional or which policy to push or avoid from week to week. So, they avoid mustering enough votes to pass any legislation to put on the president’s desk for him to sign into law. Trump is forcing the masks to come off the members of the UniParty. Never before have we had a leader who has exposed the corruption rife in our political system and the media. Let's have everyone in Congress reveal why they turned a blind eye to Obama.

Ryan is up for re-election in 2018 and Paul Nehlen, a pro-Trump America-First man, is his primary opponent. Hopefully Wisconsin's 1st Congressional District will defeat Ryan, but Nehlen's chance is really not that good. If Ryan is still with us after 2018, the chances are slim for the House to appoint another Speaker. Ryan is again showing that he is another RINO adhering obediently to the Democrat agenda. Unfortunately, Ryan, McCain, Flake and McConnell, along with Murkowski and Collins are out for themselves and do not vote along party lines to help their party and the president. This is one of the huge differences between the Republicans and Democrats. The Democrats do protect their own.

~ Links To More News ~

Jeff Sessions To Make DACA Announcement Tuesday Morning

Trump's Pipeline Agenda Takes A Hit With Court Ruling

Leftist Georgia High School Teacher Smacked Down Over Ban Of MAGA Attire

Corrupt Media Haunted By The Precedents Set While Colluding With Obama

Sunday, September 3, 2017

Antifa And The Broader Liberal Agenda...

Moonbattery -- Like the KKK in the olden days, Antifa is effectively the domestic terrorist wing of the Democrat Party. Lt. Col. Allen West gets where Antifa fits into the broader liberal effort to fundamentally transform America into a country more to the liking of moonbats:

Blog Author's Comments: Apparently, the FBI and DHS have classified Antifa as a "domestic terrorist group". It is curious why I did not hear that either CNN or MSNBC had reported on this. One gets the distinct impression the national Socialist Media is on the side of the Fascist Anti Freedom Axis. The Democrat Party is the political wing of Antifa. Someone somewhere needs to unleash the cops and put down these people, inflict some serious pain. Antifa wants to attack Trump supporters and the Democrats want Antifa to attack Trump supporters.

~ Links To More News ~

Mitch McConnell Is The New Nancy Pelosi

Was Obama The Man Behind Comey's Fix To Let Hillary Off The Hook?

Judge Orders FBI To Release Unredacted Subpoenas From Clinton Investigation