Blog Author's Input: The dispute between Tucker Carlson and Sidney Powell points to a larger failure — the failure of the media to do anything resembling investigative journalism on this or any other story. And the last time I checked Carlson was a talk show host, so does he really believe Sydney Powell should present her case to him before she and the team go to the courts? She would not be much of an attorney, if she told him what evidence they had, to overturn the fraud of an election. I must assume that Carlson finally joined the ranks of his fellow liberal friends at Fox news.
He acted as if he is entitled that Powell should come on his show to present evidence. If she goes on any show, it is because she wants to be there, not going on a show does not mean by default, she has anything to hide which was what Carlson insinuated. He may have hurt himself for acting like the rest of the media, he is now receiving the backlash he deserves. He was one of the few journalists left with any credibility, this is what can happen when he apparently allows favorable ratings to convince him to believe he is more important than he is.
Carlson must assume Powell's function is to produce their court case for him. Why doesen't he have his researchers do some work, instead of making her seem unfair, or that maybe there are probems with their case because she did not jump at his request.
Hits Sidney Powell And Says No Evidence of Switching Votes
An update on our reporting on Sidney Powell’s voter fraud investigation. Watch. pic.twitter.com/ho6Dkv0IXf
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) November 21, 2020
