Peter Strozok Failed His Polygraph Test Yet Retained Security Clearance And Position On Two Investigations...

Paul Sperry - Breaking: Strzok himself posed a national security risk while he was investigating Trump & his campaign aides for national security threats. Strzok flunked a 2016 internal polygraph be FB‎I, yet retained access to TS/SCI classified info & continued to run 2 major espionage probes.

Validating Paul Sperry’s tweet. Yes, FBI Agent Peter Strzok failed his polygraph and his supervisors were notified on January 16th, 2016, his results were “out of scope“. Meaning he failed his polygraph test. Yet he was never removed from any responsibilities; and against dept policy, he did not have his clearance revoked until he could clear.

This was discussed during the Rosenstein testimony and overlooked by most. WATCH:

(Via: TLR)

---

Blog Author's Comments: FBI agent Peter Strzok is just the hit man. The question is who gave the go ahead against Donald Trump? Was it Comey on orders from Obama and or Hillary? The FBI and DOJ are totally compromised, this is more than just a few bad apples that landed in all of the top jobs. Peter Strzok and others have been revealed as bigoted because they are part of the deep state swamp.

One only needs to look at how Special Counsel Mueller has stacked the lawyers on his team to squeeze anyone in their way. The lowest level of legal “ethics” that is employed, is an honest measure of what the lawyers are comfortable with justifying. So, in this video featuring Wray and Rosenstein, dodging a question is extremely easy for them. It is always an "ongoing investigation" and cannot be commented on and will be dealt with.

The majority of the American public has a very limited attention span. I believe if the real enemies were dealt with now, the unwashed masses would have forgotten all about it by November. The media would be working to cover up and the enemy will be planning more morally offensive moves to fit their narrative and attempt, to raise false flag operations to distract everyone.

FYI: Paul E. Sperry is an American conservative author and political commentator. He was a media fellow at the Hoover Institution, a public policy think tank.

---

Chairman Goodlatte: "FBI Lawyers Instructed Peter Strzok Not To Answer Many, Many Questions"...

Suffice to say it’s not a good look when lawyers representing the FBI are telling the central witness within a political conspiracy involving the FBI not to answer questions from congressional oversight.

House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte tells Martha MacCallum that FBI lawyers are instructing FBI Agent Peter Strzok not to answer questions from congress about the nature of his involvement within a DOJ/FBI conspiracy to stop a political candidate; and later to overthrow a presidency.

Additionally Chairman Goodlatte states the answers agent Strzok did give about his text messages was “not believable”.

(Via: TLR)

---

Blog Author's Comments: I do not believe that Strzok was even under oath. But, he and his lawyer and the FBI are now in their CYA mode. The FBI is obviously stonewalling. There is no longer just “smoke.” There is a burning conflagration, or an extensive fire that has and is destroying the once proud FBI.

They do not believe that Congress under the US Constitution is entitled to hear or see exactly what they have been doing for the past two or more years, in an attempt to stop and delegitimize candidate and now President Trump. The FBI/DOJ are acting in a high-handed manner that can only be stopped by action from an empowered member of the Executive Branch who is not part of the Cabal.

I have to wonder if only the President is going to be able to force compliance with the facts, and anyone in Congress who thinks he will be impeached for enforcing the Constitution is totally wrong. Apparently agent Peter Strzok with advice from the FBI legal counsel refused to answer many questions.

I am not surprised and believe if his lawyer was not there he would have pleaded the 5th the entire time. This game will only continue. Strzok cannot be near truthful and hope to survive. The media has started their new spin on the Peter Strzok texts by limiting the context and details of their “text analysis” and his testimony to selected phrases and words, as they always do. i.e. Strzok was referring to his opinion as a citizen and he was performing a higher duty.

---

Michael Flynn's Brother: Where Is Rule Of Law When A Sitting President Can Launch An Investigation On The Opposing Candidate's Campaign

In a shocking admission on Wednesday The New York Times reported the FBI opened an investigation dubbed “Crossfire Hurricane” into Trump’s campaign 100 days before the Presidential election.

The FBI was spying on the opposition party’s campaign 100 days before the election. The spying was based on a phony Russian dossier that was paid for by Democrats and Hillary Clinton and by the hearsay of a low-level Trump campaign official who was coached by FBI operatives on Russian rumors.

Five agents, including Peter Strzok traveled to London in the summer of 2016 to interview with a diplomat after Papadopoulos drunkenly claimed to Australian Ambassador Alexander Downer he knew who had Hillary’s emails.

Deep State operatives released this information to The New York Times for Wednesday’s report.

On Thursday Michael Flynn’s brother Joseph Flynn posted this important question on Twitter:

"Jumpin John Brennan and the #CrossfireHurricane … where is the rule of law when a sitting President can launch an investigation into an opposing candidates presidential campaign?"
(Via: GP)

---

Blog Author's Comments: Rule of law? I believe we lost that during the Clinton era and Obama cemented the evil. Obama has absolutely done so much damage to the country and taken the Democratic Party along and deeper in the mire than ever before. I have to assume former president Jimmy Carter is pleased that he is no longer considered, by many, the worst president ever. Not since the reign of Barack Hussein Obama.

What has happened to president Donald Trump is clearly unprecedented. This has to be the most corrupt political time in America's history with the Democratic Party, FBI, CIA, DOJ and the mainstream media doing what they do best. Our country is now much like a banana republic where laws are for the "little" people or those that dare confront the controllers.

I wonder if Hillary Clinton appreciates Obama, Comey, Brennan, Clapper and the higher leadership of many agencies of the intelligence community, sacrificing their careers and integrity in an effort to get her elected. While we may never know how badly Obama corrupted the FBI and our justice system, electing Donald Trump was a start.

---

The "Tip Of The Iceberg" - The Intelligence Memo Is Just The Beginning, Not The End...

There continue to be questions about the substance behind the pending release of the House Intelligence Committee memo. With that release in mind, today it is worthwhile remembering this is the beginning of exposing the corruption within the DOJ not the end.

For several years the U.S. justice department has maintained an attitude of non-accountability within its ranks. The Obama years elevated that attitude and provided multiple examples of a DOJ gone rogue.

A complicit media enables that attitude by engineering a false narrative the U.S. Justice Department was/is an independent fourth branch of government; unaccountable to congress and entirely separate from the executive branch.

The House Intelligence Memo is simply using the example of currently known FISA abuse to open the door and show the U.S. electorate how corrupt this unaccountable institution has become. Behind that door are very uncomfortable realities for all of those who constructed the weaponized agency; and also those who have benefited from it.

Unfortunately the corruption appears systemic within the entire justice system. This is the problem currently being confronted. This is also a system being defended by a political media apparatus who have benefited from seeing their opposition targeted. The American people became the threat to their system. The American people became their enemy. This outlook sounds stark, but this is exactly the way the DOJ has behaved.

We The People are in an abusive relationship with the Department of Justice.

Republican Representative Mark Meadows puts it thusly:

Because through all the “memo” news and headlines, it’s critical to remember why this issue is important and why it should matter to everyday Americans.

What this issue is all about: whether the Department of Justice and FBI, under President Obama, abused their surveillance authority against American citizens and political opponents. Put another way: was the Obama DOJ weaponized to spy on the Trump campaign?

Remember, in general, the DOJ and FBI spying on American citizens should automatically be met with MAJOR skepticism. That’s what the Fourth Amendment is designed to protect against. When those American citizens are ALSO political opponents? It should raise even more red flags.

So, take that principle, and look at what happened in this case. The DOJ spied on Carter Page, an American citizen. Red flag. Carter Page was also part of the Trump campaign. Double red flag. It should automatically raise questions.

Now, pause: we know about the Peter Strzok/Lisa Page texts, the “missing” texts, the McCabe concerns, etc. But this is about more. Focus on the dossier here–the political opposition research project put together by Christopher Steele, Fusion GPS, and the DNC by extension.

Quite simply: This infamous “Russian Dossier” was unverified political opposition research paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC. If the Department of Justice used information like that as a key part of getting a surveillance warrant, it would be a HUGE problem.

Now, from what we’ve already known for months, it sure looks like that’s exactly what happened: that the FBI used that very dossier to get a warrant. @Jim Jordan asked the FBI about it 2 months ago. I asked too. We asked for the FISA application, and the FBI wouldn’t show us.

WATCH:


We’ve asked repeatedly for information from the FBI, both privately and publicly. We’ve openly told FBI and DOJ officials–if we’re wrong, tell us! Tell us what was in the FISA application. Let us see the document. But we’ve been stonewalled for almost a year.

So the bottom line is this: if, in 2016, the DOJ and FBI used an unverified, Clinton/DNC paid-for dossier to spy on American citizens (and political opponents) in the Trump campaign, that is as wrong as it gets. If that happened, Americans deserve to know about it. Period.

Last point: If you remember anything from this news cycle, remember: your right as an American to privacy from your government spying on you is critical. It is foundational to who we are as a Republic. Never take that right for granted, no matter the political party you belong to.

The release of the House Intelligence Memo is only the tip of the iceberg; the crack in the door to see just how corrupt the unaccountable Justice System became.
(Via: TLR)

---

You Can Read The Full Text Of The Nunes Memo Here
Blog Author's Comments: From what I have seen for the past few months, I already knew or assumed almost everything that I saw contained within the four page memo. Anyone not paying attention will continue sticking their heads in the sand, and it is highly debatable whether the mainstream media will even mention any of the truth within the release of this document of long known facts regarding the corruption in Obama's regime.

The bizarre reaction by the Democrats to the memo is revealing. They are dirty and tone deaf. The FISA applications were based on the dossier. We knew that. What we didn’t know was that the DOJ/FBI used the media as a source to render credibility to the dossier in the FISA applications. And the DOJ/FBI didn’t bother to notice or report that the same guy that wrote the dossier was the source for the media article they used to assign the credibility. Who is in charge of the FISA judges? Will Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts do anything with this knowledge? The DOJ/FBI has made the FISA judges look like easily duped fools.

The Devin Nunes memo offered more information to many and was even worse than they thought. The FBI knew that Democrats and Hillary Clinton were behind the Dossier, the FBI did not tell the court in getting the warrants. Comey, McCabe, Rosenstein, Yates, Boente all implicated. And this is why they didn’t want anyone to see it. They should all go to jail, especially Comey. And Democrats can’t argue any of this away. This is why Andrew McCabe was removed.

The bias and spin that the Democrats and their counterparts within the mainstream media will put on this information will make all of this more intertwined and difficult for those who are not that interested, to understand the full extent of what has happened, to the DOJ and FBI. Two organizations that most of the people thought they could trust. Perhaps this memo will make Special Counsel Robert Mueller stop and take notice with what he is and has currently been doing. I have known and now many others know, that Mueller is targeting the wrong person. The special counsel needs to be focused on the Hillary Clinton campaign, not the Trump campaign. All in all, we have the biggest abuse of power and corruption to influence a presidential election in the history of our country.

---

In His 'Jaw-Dropping' Text, Peter Strzok Expressed 'Concern' About Joining Mueller Team

The FBI’s top agent on the Trump-Russia investigation sent a text message last year that one top Republican senator says suggests he saw no evidence of Trump campaign collusion.

The text message, which was sent by Peter Strzok, is “jaw-dropping,” Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said in a radio interview on Tuesday.

In an interview with WISN-Milwaukee radio host Jay Weber, Johnson read aloud a May 19, 2017 text that Strzok sent to Lisa Page, an FBI lawyer and his mistress.

Strzok wrote: “You and I both know the odds are nothing. If I thought it was likely, I’d be there no question. I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern that there’s no big there there.”

Johnson said that the text referred to the Mueller investigation, which had kicked off two days earlier. Strzok joined that team, but was removed in July after the Justice Department’s inspector general discovered his anti-Trump text exchanges with Page.

As the FBI’s deputy counterintelligence chief, Strzok was picked in July 2016 to oversee the investigation into possible Trump campaign collusion with the Russian government. Prior to that, he was a top investigator on the Clinton email inquiry.

“I think that’s kind of jaw-dropping,” said Johnson, a Republican, said of the Strzok text.

“In other words, Peter Strzok, who was the FBI deputy assistant director of the counterintelligence division, the man who had a plan to do something because he just couldn’t abide Donald Trump being president, is saying that his gut sense is that there’s no big there there when it comes to the Mueller special counsel investigation,” he said.

The text message was included in 400 pages of text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page. Lawmakers have started reviewing the trove of documents for evidence of anti-Trump and pro-Clinton bias.

Johnson also addressed the revelation last Friday that the FBI “failed to preserve” five months worth of text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page. A Justice Department official told Johnson’s committee and five other congressional panels that a “misconfiguration” issue caused “many” FBI-issued mobile devices to not back up to the bureau’s servers.

The FBI said it does not have text messages for Strzok and Page for the period between Dec. 14, 2016 and May 17, 2017 — the day that Mueller was appointed.

Johnson said that Congress needs to see the missing text messages because Strzok and Page were “completely unguarded in their communication.”

“So we’re getting insight into exactly what is happening inside the FBI at the highest levels. And who knows who else they might implicate in terms of corruption,” he said.
(Via: Daily Caller)

---

Blog Author's Comments: This revelation surprises no one. To use a lie by Barack Hussein Obama, 'Not a Smidgen of Corruption'. The FBI, Obama and Hillary Clinton all need to be dealt with. Is Sessions up to it? No! So, how will anything be accomplished to hold these people accountable? Who can believe the FBI in anything any longer?

And I would not trust and accept whatever special counsel Robert Mueller comes back with, if we will ever see the end of his 'investigation'. All of this doesn't even surprise the leftist 'Destroy Trump' media, they have had to know - but did not want to admit - that from day one, the Trump-Russian collusion allegations were all lies.

They are complicit in a concerted effort by the Deep State and Democratic leadership to carry out a coup against our Republic and frame our President for something they know he was innocent of. All of this has happened because everyone on the left and many on the right were sure Hillary Clinton would be the president.

---

Five Months Worth Of Agent Peter Strzok Text Messages Are Missing, FBI Cites Mystery "Glitch"

Additional text messages sent and received by disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok have been handed over to Congress, reports the Associated Press.

In yet another twist to the Peter Strzok saga, a block of text messages were withheld by the FBI to Congress over a mystery glitch.

AP reports:

"But the department also said in a letter to lawmakers that its record of messages sent to and from the agent, Peter Strzok, was incomplete because the FBI, for technical reasons, had been unable to preserve and retrieve about five months’ worth of communications.

New text messages highlighted in a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray by Sen. Ron Johnson, the Republican chairman of the Senate’s Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, are from the spring and summer of 2016 and involve discussion of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. They reference Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s decision to accept the FBI’s conclusion in that case and a draft statement that former FBI Director James Comey had prepared in anticipation of closing out the Clinton investigation without criminal charges."

According to The Hill’s John Solomon, newly obtained text messages between Strzok and Bureau lawyer Lisa Page demonstrate more anti-Trump bias at the agency than previously known. The FBI agent, once a fixture of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe, told Page that he enjoyed seeing then Fox News host Megyn Kelly “going after,” Trump during the debates.

Solomon reports:

When the two shared a National Public Radio article on the opening of Trump’s new hotel in Washington, the two could barely contain their disdain.

“That’s one place I hope I never stay in,” Page wrote.

Strzok replied. “Agreed. I hope it fails horribly.”

Occasionally the two also opined about the media in general. Strzok, for instance, called a New York Post article about agents unhappy with the outcome of the Clinton email case “stupid,” and referred to Fox anchor Chris Wallace as a “turd.”

After one of the presidential debates, Strzok also had an observation about then-Fox anchor and current NBC anchor Megyn Kelly. “Vaguely satisfying to see Megyn Kelly (who had Botox and looks HORRIBLE) utterly going after Trump,” he texted.

Last month, Fox News published a portion of the approximately 10,000 texts messages sent between FBI agent Peter Strzok and lawyer Lisa Page. Among the messages is an exchange revealing Strzok and Page discussed an ‘insurance policy,’ against a Trump presidency.

Least we forget Page sent a text to Strzok stating, ‘Trump should go f*ck himself’.

The dots are connecting. Top FBI brass were working with Hillary Clinton to make sure she was exonerated from her criminal investigation while simultaneously building a case against Donald Trump.
(Via: GP)

---

Blog Author's Comments: Five months of missing texts and memos, certainly sounds and shows that someone and probably multiple people are trying to destroy evidence of collusion against President Trump. The entire scam by the FBI should result in prison time for some of those involved. Could this by chance be referred to as 'obstruction of justice'? This coming week should be an eye opener for the American people.

This kind of garbage and muck is why the memo must be released or leaked. What has happened and is still ongoing is 'in your face' corruption at the highest level of the FBI, which has continued for approximately two years or longer. I don't want to hear that former FBI Director James Comey, and many others did not know about or were not willing contributors to this entire mess and scam.

The disappearance of the documents tells us that the traitors behind the scenes think they already have the upper hand and it is too late for the righteous Republic to do anything about it. Are the missing documents in the same place as Hillary’s 33,000 missing emails? Do they really think we are that ignorant and inept that we cannot see through this charade? One of the highest offices in the world has “glitches” and at a very convenient time for them.

---

Latest Revelations Make The Entire 'Collusion' Probe Look Like A Partisan Hit

NY Post -- So Peter Strzok wasn’t just a top investigator for special counsel Robert Mueller until he was axed for anti-Trump and pro-Clinton bias: He was also a major player in the Hillary email probe and the FBI work that led to the “collusion” investigation.

And Mueller and the FBI both dragged their feet on sharing key info about all this with Congress. Including the news that Strzok was the one who changed then-FBI chief Jim Comey’s draft language on Clinton’s use of that private server from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless” in the final version.

That’s huge, because the statute specifies that gross negligence in the handling of classified info is itself a crime, whatever the intent —though Comey declared that Clinton shouldn’t face prosecution precisely because she had no “intent” to break the law.

Strzok also conducted the FBI interviews of Clinton and her top aides, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, in the email probe.

More, he was reportedly one of the major FBI figures urging investigations on the basis of the “Steele dossier” of Russian-sourced scurrilous anti-Trump allegations, which we now know was commissioned by the Clinton campaign.[...]

The public doesn’t know just how egregious Strzok’s bias was, and won’t until the release of his texts with his mistress, an FBI lawyer who sigh) was also on Mueller’s team.

But as things stand, it now looks like the fix was well and truly in on the Hillary probe. Far worse, it also looks like the “collusion” probe was a partisan hit from the start — which undermines the basis for Mueller’s own investigation. What a mess.
Continue reading > >

---

Blog Author's Comments: Rightfully this whole witch hunt should be shut down, because there was no 'Trump/Russia collusion'. This fallacy was manufactured and trumpeted by the Clinton campaign and their deep state allies, just to obstruct the electoral will of the American people, and to draw attention away from their own malfeasance. Who finally woke up at the NY Post? Everyone else has known from the beginning it was a partisan hit job. The current stories report that Strzok has been reassigned to the FBI’s human resources department. Meaning Strzok still has a job? I would assume if he is ousted, he would blow the whistle on Comey, Mueller and everyone else who had any input into what has been happening for a year. Mueller wants to stop that from materializing.

We knew it was a partisan operation hit job from the beginning. We recognized that ten minutes after Trump's election, that he and we would be enduring four years of non-stop attacks from both Democrats and some Republicans embedded in the beltway, who just could not come to grips that Trump won the election and was now our president. Just remember that anything is justified if one is on the left. Obama and crew made every part of the Federal bureaucracy into a vast network of progressive/Marxist agents.

Just imagine where we would be today if Hillary had become the president. The FBI needs a complete cleansing, but that is not an easy task. They have operated as the Gestapo for 8 years or more, with Obama, Holder and Lynch along with Mueller and Comey. It is most certainly true that the Democrats and RINO’s would attempt anything to keep the public blind to the corruption in DC. Had Hillary Clinton won, the words "Russian collusion" would have never been heard in the US media. And, many of the foul and criminal actions of the Democrats would never have seen the light of day.

---

~ Links To More News ~
The Smoking Gun Of FBI's Bias
Robert Mueller's Mighty Tuna Shrinks To A Goldfish
Mueller Investigation Looking More Like The Revenge Of James Comey
Enough: FBI And Justice Department Corruption Needs To End