Biden Says He “Really Enjoyed Teaching” When a “Professor” at the Univ. of Pennsylvania – Biden Never Taught a Single Class

The following from thegatewaypundit.com.

Joe Biden said he “really enjoyed teaching” when he was a “professor” at the University of Pennsylvania during an interview with podcast host Heather Cox Richardson.

This is one of Joe Biden’s favorite lies.

Biden was never a “professor” or teacher after serving as Vice President in 2017. Biden was paid $1 million to do nothing, as the Daily Caller noted:

🙶 When the Daily Caller asked whether Biden had in fact taught any courses since being hired, UPenn Vice Provost for Faculty Anita Allen did not list any, saying his work was instead based in Washington.

Biden was paid to give a few speeches (typical career politician/DC grifter) but he never taught a class.

🙶 “You make me miss being a professor at Penn,” Biden said in the interview taped February 25 and released on Friday. “When I left the Vice Presidency I had a chance to do a number of things but I took a professorship at the University of Pennsylvania in presidential politics and history, so I envy you.”

Clown show video:

Biden says he “really enjoyed teaching” when he was a “professor” at the University of Pennsylvania.

Biden was paid $1 million, but never taught a single class. pic.twitter.com/vR2xzdOlDe

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) March 4, 2022

---

He really enjoyed teaching and writing even though he never taught anything and much of his "writing" was plagiarized. Biden was installed because of a stolen election, proving that being incompetent and totally corrupt still made him a hero for his Democratic Party followers. A pretend professor then and now he is a make believe president. You cannot blame this on him being a senile old fool, lying and plagiarism is what he has done his entire life.

Why does the Media not call him on his lies and total ineptness during his entire career in politics? Are they all members of the Democratic Party or simply traitors to their jobs and country? No one challenges him on the utter fabrications and disconnect from reality. This is dangerous and wrong on so many levels.

---

Editorial Cartoon by Gary Varvel

Stacey Abrams Panics, Deletes Maskless Photo of Herself Surrounded by Masked Children During Visit to Georgia School

A maskless Stacey Abrams was photographed with masked children during her visit to a Georgia elementary school last week.

The following from gatewaypundit.com.

🙶 Georgia Democrat gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams has been branded a “mask Fascist” for wanting the government to impose mask mandates for all Georgians.

Abrams, a morbidly obese 48-year-old, is at a much higher risk of dying from Covid than children, but she’s the only one not wearing a mask. This is child abuse.

The principal from Glennwood Elementary School shared the photo of Abrams on Twitter.

Dr. Holly Brookins tweeted the photo of Abrams with this caption: “Extraordinary way to kick off the 3rd annual African-American Read-in at GlennWood and Black History Month. Thrilled to host Stacey Abrams author of Stacey’s Extraordinary Words!”

Stacey Abrams retweeted the photos and responded to the principal: Spending time with Glennwood’s amazing students, faculty and staff ranks as spectacular, delightful and outstanding. Thank you for having me.”

🙶 Dr. Holly Brookins deleted her entire twitter account and Stacey Abrams deleted her tweet after the two got roasted for Abrams’ maskless photo.

Hi @staceyabrams and @hmbrookins, why did both of you delete these tweets? pic.twitter.com/6rdmT2iHIj

— Libs of Tik Tok (@libsoftiktok) February 6, 2022

People went off on Abrams for the maskless photo op.

Larry O’Connor called Abrams a “cruel monster” for forcing the children to mask.

Are these little children forced to wear masks to protect @staceyabrams?

What kind of cruel monster makes little children cover their faces so they can have a photo op without fear of viral infection?

If you're so afraid that you make kids wear masks around you, stay home! pic.twitter.com/6fq8StnWva

— Larry O'Connor (@LarryOConnor) February 6, 2022

Clay Travis registers his thoughts concerning maskless Abrams.

The number of left wing politicians who post photos posing without masks while all the kids around them are wearing masks is stunning. Here is Stacey Abrams doing it. This is child abuse. pic.twitter.com/actF0YFGrz

— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) February 6, 2022

Stephen Miller comments on Abrams photo sans mask.

In so many ways, this picture embodies the elitism, arrogance, cruelty, science denial, and glib authoritarianism of Joe Biden’s Democrat Party. https://t.co/hUkLNBKa1I

— Stephen Miller (@StephenM) February 6, 2022

🙶Later, Stacey Abrams gave a long-winded response to critics who attacked her for taking a maskless photo surrounded by masked children. She responded to critics’ “false political attack” with a word salad. There was no admission of wrongdoing and no apology. The best part about Stacey Abrams’ response was admitting children can’t hear through a mask.

“She wore a mask to the event, and removed it at the podium so she could be heard by students watching remotely and for photos, but only with folks who were masked,” Abrams’ campaign manager said.

So Covid stops spreading when a person poses for a photo? If Abrams did nothing wrong then why did she delete the photos from her Twitter account?

---

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Abrams did not win the current governorship of Georgia, but she would not agree and is continually in campaign mode. Perhaps she removed her mask just for the camera so everyone could see her big smile, but I seriously doubt it. The parents of these children should not be pleased that their kids were made into a political backdrop for this Socialist, Communist and Grifter politician.

Where were all the precious minority children? Most of those kids probable thought she was the new cafeteria lady. The maskless photo is constantly seen on Democrats who want it for others and I will see more, what I would like to have seen is the video of her getting up from the floor. The people who have inflicted this on other folks, especially the elderly and children, will hopefully pay a great price someday.

---

Today’s Editorial Cartoon by Chip Bok

Maxine Waters ( Head Of Banking Committee) Asks Bankers About Student Loans, She Had No Idea Government Took Over Program In 2010

The House Banking Committee, led by distinguished Democrat Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), called in the nation’s top bankers on Wednesday to lecture them on greed and political correctness.

During her questioning Mad Maxine asked the bankers about what they were doing to help those suffering with student loan debt.

The bankers quickly reminded the Banking Committee Chairperson that government took over the program in 2010.

Chairwoman Maxine was completely surprised. And this is the Democrat Party’s banking expert.
Watch...
(h/t: GWP)

---

Blog Author's Comments: In 2010, as part of the Obamacare law, the U.S. federal government took over all federal student loans. Apparently Chairwoman Waters was unaware of this as the Banking Committee Chairperson. The woman in the 'James Brown' wig, does not have a clue what is happening within the banking industry. This is another example of a person who continues to be re-elected by her liberal, low-information constituents and promises them everything but provides nothing. The democrats prey on ignorance and count on it, they need these people to maintain their voter base to be a viable party.

The so-called lawmakers such as Maxine Waters, who are able to hang around as long as she has, will eventually be handed the Chair of some committee. Now, Waters wants to show her people that she can teach these successful businessmen a lesson. She does not actually want to help all of the people, just pretend to give assistance to her voters for the next election. It was quite incredible that those banking executives did not start laughing, it was very strong self control.

---

Editorial Cartoon by Rick McKee

---

More news...
The Attorney General Says He Thinks
Spying Occurred on Trump Campaign
Attorney General William Barr confirms to Democrat Senator Jeanne Shaheen, that he is reviewing the genesis of the Mueller probe and actions taken by the FBI during the 2016 presidential campaign.

Mr. Barr says he believes that the Trump presidential campaign was spied on, and that he wants to make sure the subsequent investigation was "adequately predicated" and that rules governing law enforcement actions were followed.

Attorney General Barr on Mueller Report: "I am going to be reviewing both the genesis and the conduct of intelligence activities directed at the Trump campaign during 2016…I think spying on a political campaign is a big deal." pic.twitter.com/uz4tIqGIaa

— CSPAN (@cspan) April 10, 2019

---

Blog Author's Educated Input: Democrats Freak Out Over AG Barr's 'Spying' Comment. Some call for his impeachment while others accuse Barr of being a Russian agent.

Prominent Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer were furious over Barr’s remarks during a Senate hearing on Wednesday.

“He is the Attorney General of the United States, not the attorney general of Donald Trump,” Pelosi said. And Schumer said the Attorney General was obligated to “retract his statement immediately.”

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) called Barr’s confirmation of spying “dangerous.” While House Intelligence Committee Chairman “Shifty” Adam Schiff (Calif.) said Barr’s comments somehow strike a “destructive blow” to America’s democracy.

The mainstream media pundits are also melting down, with Washington Post writer Jennifer Rubin calling for Barr to be impeached.

The Democrats, Left and all the media, did not receive what they expected from Special Counsel Mueller and now Attorney General Barr. So they are unhappy and will have to resort to another tactic to continue their daily narrative. Mueller and his people, they were sure, would come up with at least one impeachable offense to finally rid them of their nemesis President Trump. And they could finally show the American people that they were not lying about the president or publishing and broadcasting 'fake news'. But, they did not receive what they so badly wanted.

Kamala Harris Claims She's Not A Socialist, She Just Wants Your Money For The Green New Deal

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez may be too young to run for president next year but there is one Democrat mounting a serious challenge to AOC’s throne as the queen of bullshit.

She may be the current frontrunner for the 2020 nomination but Democrat Kamala Harris continues to demonstrate that she is just an empty pantsuit armed with a plethora of DNC talking points that she dispenses to a fawning media.

But don’t call her a socialist!

While the leaderless Democrats continue their journey to the far left with the embrace of socialist redistribution schemes like government jobs for all, free college tuition, free healthcare, and a borderless society, there is still a certain amount of stigma attached to the dreaded “S” word with many of the machine politicians like Harris.

Even though she called for the complete elimination of private insurance during a CNN town hall last month and then had to walk it back, California’s junior senator is pushing the same crackpot schemes that have been pitched to gullible millennials and the unproductive underclass by snake oil salespeople like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Just don’t call it socialism.

In an interview with CNN’s John King that is making the rounds this morning, Harris denied being a “socialist” while emphatically stating that she is a progressive Democrat although one would be hard-pressed to find much difference between the two anymore.


Never mind the existential threat from cow flatulence, that was some serious hot gas coming out of Kamala’s pie hole.

The Green New Deal is already akin to religious dogma with Democratic party hopefuls as they kowtow to their extremist base but there is still no answer – especially from a woman who strives to be the nation’s first female POTUS – on how it will be paid for.

But that just doesn’t matter because its somebody else’s money. And that IS socialism.
(Via: Def-Con News )

---

Blog Author's Comments: There is no limit on the amount of money spent with Socialism, as long as it increases the size of government and control over the working class. Harris is a spoiled child who never learned to take responsibility for her actions or to be truthful, just like all Democrats. She has affirmative-actioned her way through law school and now she is trying to lie her way into the White House.

She says she is not a socialist, but she supports: Free income, even if you do not work, free education including college, free healthcare, free transportation, free energy, but rationed, free childcare, free housing and free food, all of this controlled by the government. What better reason does a semi-intelligent person have to never vote for the anyone in the Democratic Party?

I used to believe, not long ago, that folks would just laugh and never take politicians like her seriously, along with Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker along with the rest of the Democrats who are now extremely far left. But, it does make one wonder what would happen if the Democratic Party regains total of our government.

---

Editorial Cartoon by A. F. Branco

George Will's Misguided Case For Voting Against The GOP This Year

What is American conservatism? Is it an attitude, an aesthetic and/or sensibility, an approach to living? Or is it a set of policy preferences — limited government interference in our lives, lower taxes, judges who don’t invent rights, a strong military, etc.?

For me it is both. But one’s opinion as to which of these strands predominates will likely determine one’s view of President Trump.

Conservatives who view conservatism as mainly a set of policy preferences will probably be quite pleased with Trump. He has lowered taxes, cut government regulation, taken on Obamacare, appointed conservative judges, and strengthened the military.

There are other conservative policy preferences Trump has not honored, must notably free trade. But it’s unrealistic to expect a president to adopt conservative orthodoxy up and down the line.

Conservatives who view conservatism as mainly an attitude, aesthetic, and approach to living are likely quite displeased with Trump. He’s vulgar and dishonest, among other character flaws. He respects neither tradition nor his office as traditionally understood. He loves to smash things, which is the antithesis of the conservative attitude.

It has always seemed to me that, for George Will, conservatism is predominantly an attitude. More than any other modern commentator I know of, he has the knack of making his aesthetic preferences seem like moral imperatives.

Thus, it’s not surprising that Will can’t stand Trump. Nor is it surprising that his hatred is so great that he wants Republicans to lose control of both chambers of Congress.

Their sin? They haven’t used their Article II power to thwart this president. Stated differently, congressional Republicans “have become the president’s poodles.” (Query: Is that worse than being a “lapdog,” as Will once described George H.W. Bush?)

One searches nearly in vain for discussion about policy in Will’s column urging a vote against the GOP this year. When one finds some, it doesn’t back his desire to see Democrats take control on Congress.

Will is unhappy that Speaker Ryan hasn’t pushed for entitlement reform. But Democrats don’t do entitlement reform. And many of the Democrats Will hopes to see become freshmen members of Congress are going to be around after Trump has moved on from office.

As for curbing presidential power, congressional Republicans have exactly the same attitude as congressional Democrats. They want to curb it when the other party holds the presidency, but not when their party does.

From a policy standpoint, then, there is no conservative case for wanting the Democrats to gain power at President Trump’s expense. That desire in a conservative can only be explained on aesthetic grounds.

Even in these terms, it’s not easy to explain. The modern Democratic party is a walking, talking rebuke to conservative sensibilities. But Will can argue that if Trump goes up in flames, the GOP might become more appealing to his.[...]

That should be more than enough reason to induce mainstream conservatives to back congressional Republicans this year and Donald Trump in 2020.
(Via: PL)

---

Blog Author's Comments: George Will hates Trump for the obvious reason, President Trump doesn't listen to him. I doubt that Trump reads his columns or takes his calls. For Will this situation is intolerable. Will is the typical former conservative whose decades in Washington have turned him into a puppy for the DC globalist elite. He wants to be invited to 'A' list dinner parties, so he says what he must to be acceptable to his Democrat DC friends.

People like George Will seem to fancy themselves to be the heirs of William F. Buckley. Buckley was an unashamed intellectual and member of the elite. He was smooth, intelligent, eloquent, and witty. Unlike Will, however, Buckley understood the nature of the Left. Mr. Will believes himself a baseball fan and expert, so using his preferred medium it is safe to say, Mr. Will, a return to the minors if not an outright retirement is now suggested.

---

Eric Holder: I'll Run For President If I Believe I Can Unify The Country...

Former Obama administration attorney general Eric Holder said Wednesday that if he ran for president, he would do so from concluding he could unify the country.

That statement came during an exclusive interview with New York Times reporter Alex Burns. Burns noted that Holder has become much more ambiguous about whether he could run for president in 2020 and asked about his general thoughts.

“If you were gonna do it, why would you do it. If you didn’t do it, why would you not do it?” Burns asked.

“If I were gonna do it, I’d do it because I think I would have concluded that maybe I could unify the country,” Holder said.

He then clarified, “help unify the country, because it’s bigger than any one person.”

“That I could advance—actually, that I could repair then advance the nation in a variety of contexts. That I thought I had something to contribute, that would be the thing that would push me toward considering a run,” Holder said.

Here is the video:

(Via: LI)

---

Blog Author's Comments: Eric Holder is obviously deeply committed to unifying the country (heavy sarcasm). And according to Benjamin Weingarten: "Doesn’t get any richer than Eric Holder — Mr. “I Won’t Prosecute Black Panthers with Billy Clubs Standing in Front of a Voting Center" — talking about a basic census question on citizenship “intimidating” people."

The Hill reports: Holder is currently preparing to fight Trump’s decision to include a citizenship question on the census.

A Democratic group headed by former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder will go to court over a decision by the Commerce Department to include a question about citizenship on the 2020 census.

Holder said Tuesday that the group, the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, would fight the Trump administration’s decision, arguing that including a citizenship question would drastically lower the response rate on the 2020 census and lead to an inaccurate count.

“We will litigate to stop the Administration from moving forward with this irresponsible decision,” Holder said. “The addition of a citizenship question to the census questionnaire is a direct attack on our representative democracy.”

Holder, being part of the Obama regime which divided this country to a point where it is as bad as the lead up to the Civil War, set race relations to an all time low. He was one of the worst in politicizing the DOJ and helped create the weaponizing of the various agencies. Yes, he would be a unification type candidate, unifying the insane and out of control leftists. He is almost as narcissistic as his man-child President and so scandal free, at least as far as the media propaganda machine is concerned.

Holder was the first Attorney General to be held in contempt of Congress. Why wasn't this corrupt, contemptable, racist, gun running marxist held accountable for his actions while working for the government? The citizenship question is another win for the right because it is calling attention to the left wanting non-citizens voting. The Trump administration's decision to add a question about U.S. citizenship to the 2020 census form, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters: “It's something that has been included in every census since 1965, with the exception of 2010, when it was removed.” Because the Obama administration removed it.

---

~ Links To More News ~
Netflix Appoints Former Obama Advisor Susan Rice To Board Of Directors
Census Bureau Submits Planned 2020 Questions To Congress
Dianne Feinstein Wants To Know Why You Need An AR-15

Nancy Pelosi - Least Liked Congressional Leader

Congressional Favorability Ratings
Speaker of the House - Nancy Pelosi, Remains Least Liked Congressional Leader
34% favorable, 59% unfavorable
Rasmussenreports.com
With less than six weeks to go until Election Day, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi remains the most unpopular of the four top congressional leaders as she has been since this session of Congress began early last year. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is a close second.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 59% of Likely U.S. Voters have an unfavorable opinion of Pelosi, including 47% who view the San Francisco Democrat Very Unfavorably. Thirty-four percent (34%) regard Pelosi favorably, with 12% Very Favorable toward her. Only seven percent (7%) have no opinion of the speaker.

Since February of last year, Pelosi’s favorables have ranged from a low of 28% to a high of 43% in April just after passage of the national health care bill. Her unfavorables have run from 52% to 64%.

Reid, who is struggling for reelection in Nevada, is seen favorably by 30% and unfavorably by 50%. This includes Very Favorables of six percent (6%) and Very Unfavorables of 33%.- Read more

---

When Nancy Pelosi came to power, she promised that the Democrats will have "most honest and most ethical congress in history."

---

Blog author's comments - Nancy Pelosi: Your approval rating, according to the Rasmussen poll, does not surprise me. Anyone who has followed your career, especially during the last four years, should understand why your rating is so low. You should not be a member of Congress.

The midterms don't look so good for your fellow Democrats. I have heard the party leadership has determined that this is just a simple problem of those running for office mis-communicating with the voters. The leadership has concluded that faulty messaging is the problem. They believe that just a few simple changes in the candidates message is all that is needed.

Here are their simple tips for re-election:

1. Avoid talking about your legislative accomplishments.
2. Avoid talking about party leadership.
3. It’s about the minority (other) party, not about you.
4. Winning Message : No matter how bad things are, things could always be worse.
5. Winning Message : The best things always cost more (make Health Reform a winner).
6. Winning Message : Tax cuts for the rich hurts you.
7. Winning Message : Bush never really left office, he is still running things.
8. A timeless winner for every election: Accuse the other party of racism.

Nancy Pelosi, I really hope to see you pass your gavel to a member of the Republican Party in January.

h/t: free republic