Democrats Move to Restrict Lifesaving Travel Restrictions...

One reason coronavirus has not gotten much of a foothold in the USA is that Trump acted quickly to restrict travel from the severely effected areas. Next time, the president may not be able to, thanks to congressional Democrats, who can be counted on to place open borders ahead of public safety.

The “No Ban Act,” introduced by Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA) and co-sponsored by 219 House Democrats, would have prevented Trump from immediately implementing a travel ban on China once the outbreak of the coronavirus spread past its origins of Wuhan.

Instead, the No Ban Act would have allowed travelers from Wuhan to continue to arrive in the U.S. while the president received guidance from Congress.

“This bill imposes limitations on the President’s authority to suspend or restrict aliens from entering the United States and terminates certain presidential actions implementing such restrictions,” a summary of the legislation reads.

Trump must have his hands tied, lest he be able to govern effectively. The borders must remain open, lest America continue to be populated by Americans. The cost to the average citizen is irrelevant to the gentry liberal ruling class.
(h/t: MB)

---

Blog Author's Comments: The Democrats in Congress are terminally ignorant, which makes their voters look even worse. I can't imagine worse instincts on any given issue than what they routinely put forth. They and the media, purposely pick an alternative that is the exact opposite of President Trump's idea.

Democrats say President Trump's handling of Coronavirus is bad. Obama let 1,000 American's die before announcing H1N1 was a concern, and for Ebola with a very high mortality rate, he never closed our borders. It is a tribute to the strength of America that we survived eight years of Obama/Biden.

---

Editorial Cartoon by Mike Lester

The Travel "Ban" Is Headed To The Supreme Court...

Daily Caller -- The Department of Justice will bring its defense of President Donald Trump’s executive order on refugees and migrants to the Supreme Court, after the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a ruling barring the order’s enforcement.

“This Department of Justice will continue to vigorously defend the power and duty of the Executive Branch to protect the people of this country from danger, and will seek review of this case in the United States Supreme Court,” Sessions said in a statement shortly after the ruling Thursday.

There are several paths by which the ruling could reach the high court. The Department demurred when the DCNF asked how it planned to proceed.
Entire Column > >

---

Blog Author's Comments: If the Supreme Court should rule in favor of the temporary ban proposed by President Trump, that prohibits for 90 days the entry of travelers from six predominantly Muslim countries: Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen, that would help protect our country, I believe that most thinking Americans agree with the president. Excepting, of course, the liberal judges that have risked the lives of some of our people by their petty leftist rulings. This is something that is needed for American officials to conduct a review into the screening of these people to help prevent terrorist threats. Hopefully the administration by now has an improved vetting process in place. Trump cannot be expected to do everything himself. Justice Gorsuch is now on the court, but I still do not trust Chief Justice Roberts, after what he did to the United States with regard to Obama and the ACA. I will never again trust him or respect him. So, we should not become too pleased at this time. It will also take a while for the court to decide if they will accept the case and rule on it.

Trump simply replaced the late Justice Scalia with Justice Gorsuch. There is still a suspect right leaning majority at best. The White House lawyers had better prepare and argue the case to the high court very well, because this will be their last chance. One would think it should go fine for America if the court follows the Constitution, but at least four justices that I know of, do not believe in it, they have already proven that. If and when the president’s ban is approved, CNN and the rest of the news networks will be telling those who actually watch the ‘fake news’ from the Trump haters, that the Russians had something to do with the ruling and will accuse Justice Gorsuch of colluding with Russia.

---

~ Links To More News & Video ~
After Losses, Democrats Struggle To 'Un-Pelosi' The Party
Talk Hosts Band Together Against New Era Of Ccensorship
Seth Rich Family Sues Metropolitan DC Police For Information
President Trump Announces U.S.
Withdrawal From Paris Climate Accord