Elizabeth Warren Says Dems Will Raise Taxes If They Take Back Congress, Doesn't Think 50% Rate Too High

Elections have consequences. Here is Senator Elizabeth Warren, who suggested that a 50% to 90% personal income tax rate for Americans is not out of the question. Warren made the shocking admission in an interview with CNBC.

Warren also promised that Democrats will end President Trump’s tax cuts if they take control of Congress in November 2018.

CNBC’s anti-Trump pundit, John Harwood, asked Warren: “If Democrats take the Congress…would you like to see these corporate tax cuts repealed?”

Senator Warren replied: “Yeah, I really want to see them rolled back.”

Question: “Back to 35%?”

Warren replied: “Well, it’s not about the number. Here’s how I look at budgets, and taxes are at the heart of this. A lot of people think they’re just numbers; they’re not. They are the expression of our values. The values of the Republican Party that passed those tax cuts are to give $1.5 trillion away to the richest Americans and the biggest corporations, and let everybody else pick up the crumbs.”

She added: “We need a budget, we need a tax bill that works for all of us. So what I’d like to see is I’d like to see us strengthen America’s middle class.”

Harwood asked: “What’s too high for the top personal rate? Is 50% obviously too high? When George W. Bush was president, his team articulated the view that…you shouldn’t have more than one-third of your income taken [through taxation]. Do you feel similarly that it’s wrong for more than one-half of somebody’s marginal income to be taken?”

Warren suggested that she does not think a 50% personal income tax rate is too high. “There was a time in a very prosperous America…where the top marginal rate was well above 50 percent,” she said.
(Via: BPR)

---

Blog Author's Comments: Basically, Elizabeth Warren and the Democrats want to roll back the Trump tax cuts that have put money into the pockets of millions of Americans, including the middle class.

The Democrats also want to raise corporate taxes so American companies will want to move abroad, where they may receive more favorable tax treatment. This will result in the potential loss of millions of jobs in the United States.

Liberals also, apparently want the richest Americans to pay 50% to 90% in income tax, presumably to support more illegal immigrants and social welfare programs.

While Democrats pay lip service to wanting to help the middle class, welfare programs leave many dependent on the government to take care of them for most of their lives. But, this is what the Democrats actually strive for, their party depends on a constant supply of the less motivated citizens, especially if these people will go to the polls and vote for them.

Before Elizabeth Warren can think about doing this, she and many other democrats must be reelected in November. She is being challenged by Republican Shiva Ayyadurai, a “real Indian” who slammed Warren over her “fake Indian” background.

---

Two Liberal Women, Dubbed Biggest Obstructionists, They Opposed A Whopping Number Of Trump Nominees

Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York have opposed more than 90 percent of President Donald Trump’s nominees, a new analysis shows.

Gillibrand has opposed 95 percent of Trump’s nominees, while Warren has voted against 92 percent of Trump nominees, according to Axios. The two senators have opposed more Trump nominees than any other senator in either party.

Gillibrand, notably, was the only senator to oppose Gen. James Mattis’s nomination for secretary of defense.

Seven other Democrats and one independent have opposed at least 70 percent of Trump’s nominees, the Axios analysis shows.

That includes Sens. Cory Booker of New Jersey, Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Kamala Harris of California, all of whom are considered likely to run for president in 2020.
(Via: Bizpac Review)

---

Blog Author's Comments: These two have no ideas of their own except "hate and obstruct Trump." Yet women want to be more accepted in Congress and frankly, why these two? Because they do what the Democratic Party wants from them. I wonder how many confirmation hearings they attended, or do they just show up for the vote with their minds made up to vote no? There are over 300 Trump nominees still languishing in Congress awaiting approval.

This is the fault of one man, Senate Leader McConnell. This worthless career politician should be voted out by his Republican colleagues. Trump even suggested that he initiate the ‘Nuclear Option’ for all 300 but he did nothing. If we get to the mid-terms and, by chance, the democrats win the Senate then not one of those nominees will be approved. President Trump's agenda will grind to a complete halt. Does McConnell even realize this circumstance or is that really his plan?

Senate Majority Leader McConnell could keep the Senate in session for more hours in order to mitigate the Democrats’ use of the cloture process. Another procedural hurdle facing Trump nominees is the Senate "hold." The Senate generally operates on the principle of unanimous consent, so a single senator may seek to hold up an executive nominee by withholding consent. Ultimately, the decision to honor a hold request is up to the majority leader.

---

Elizabeth Warren Says US Corporate Tax Rate Not Too High

**The United States has the highest top statutory corporate tax rate in the G20.
GP -- Fake Indian Elizabeth Warren Told Yahoo News, US corporate tax rates are not high enough. And many of her Democrat counterparts also believe this nonsense.


Elizabeth Warren: "Somebody’s going to have to pay the bill to keep the government running. A generation ago corporations paid 30% of what it cost to run the federal government. Today corporations pay less than 10% and that means it falls on everyone else. All of those expenses then fall on working families."

---

Blog Author's Comments: When seeking economic advice never listen to a Socialist/Democrat. There will never be enough money for them; they want it all and then some. The problem is how much the government is spending. Elite politicians like Warren work very hard in an attempt to fabricate for the low-information crowd, that all corporations should be looked upon as the enemy, rather than the government. This is what they all do, its something so many politicians soon learn to be successful. Both parties’ do it but the Democrats are guiltier of this. And much of the time this works for them.

So when the uninitiated sees the government raising corporate taxes they think it's good. And they blame the corporations for the resulting increase in the cost of goods and services. One way or another, the government is going to take the earnings of the average American. Our problem is the government is very good at blame-shifting. The fake Indian, Sen. Warren, cannot be believed no matter what she is talking about.

It's because she's a Socialist that she hasn't redistributed her own wealth but concentrates on redistributing everyone else's. She is speaking to her economically illiterate base. The federal government operates under the principle that if a program or department does not spend its entire allotted fiscal budget; it will not be allowed to increase that budget. Therefore, all budgets are exceeded intentionally, every year.

---

~ Links To More News & Video ~
What The Media Claim Trump Did Obama Actually Did
Worried About Fallout, Democrats Poised To Poll-Test Impeachment
Obsessed! 92% Of CNN's Trump Coverage Is Negative
These Are The Questions
Mark Levin Would Ask James Comey

One Could Hope: Poll Shows Massachusetts Voters Are Open To Replacing Elizabeth Warren

Townhall -- Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), who is positioning herself to be a thorn in the Trump White House’s side, may not have a clear road to re-election in 2018. According to a new poll, 56 percent of Massachusetts voters think someone else should be given a chance to represent the state in the U.S. Senate, compared to 44 percent who support her re-election (via The Hill):

Forty-six percent of all voters told WBUR they should "give someone else a chance," compared to 44 percent who said Warren should be reelected.

Steve Koczela — president of The MassINC Polling Group, which conducted the survey — said the numbers shouldn't be "reassuring" for Warren, who is up for reelection in 2018.

"No one's going to look at a 44 percent reelect number and think that that's a good number," he told WBUR.

Roughly a third of Democrats told WBUR that someone else should be given a shot at Warren's seat. Ninety two percent of Republicans also want someone else besides Warren, a liberal favorite in the Senate, as well as 46 percent of independent voters.

Now, there are a few other things to consider. One is that Warren also holds a 51 percent approval rating. If Warren manages to shine in opposing a Trump initiative, those ratings could go up in deep-blue Massachusetts—and possibly shift those figures concerning giving someone else a chance to take her spot in the polls. It all depends on the issue. Second, the sample size was a bit low—only 508 registered voters were polled. Usually a sample of at least 600 people is the minimum for an accurate statewide poll, or at least one that give you the best picture (not saying that 92 shy would lead to widely inaccurate results). Last, we still have a lot of time before the midterm season begins. Anything can happen, but we can hope that Warren gets the axe at this point. What we do know is that she's starting to annoy liberals. MSNBC host Mike Brzezinski said that her angry demeanor was getting exhausting to watch.

---

Blog Author's Comments -- I must admit that I cannot stand to watch or listen to this woman. All Warren has ever done is lie and lie again. She has never done one thing to help anyone except herself. She is the poster child for affirmative action fraud, never mind the progressive policies she advocates. She says she is an American Indian because of something her grandmother told her. Warren has sought to explain her controversial decision to list herself as a Native American in a directory of law professors for nearly a decade before getting a job at Harvard Law School and said she was absolutely qualified for the job. She did so because of stories her grandmother told her and that she has high cheekbones. According to a Boston-area genealogist's report, Warren is 1/32nd Cherokee. This is a joke but it did get her into Harvard. She is a totally unlikeable creature so can anyone tell me why this woman was elected to office?

I have to assume she was the only one they could find that was stupid enough to meet the Democrats standards of ignorance. I really would like to see her go, but I am not going to hold my breath. Look at the state she's from. Look at the electorate there. Even if she does lose her seat, it will probably be because she lost the primary to a slightly less progressive Democrat than to anyone resembling a true moderate, or being defeated by a Republican.

This seems to me like another bogus poll. Haven't these pollsters learned anything yet? Not that I would mind seeing her kicked to the curb, but these polls seldom reflect reality. One would think that she just may be a candidate for the Democrats in 2020, because they don't really have many members of the party on the bench waiting to attempt a run to unseat President Donald Trump.

---

~ Links To More News & Video ~
New White House English-Only Website
Trump Vows To Stop 'Out Of Control' Environmentalism
Republicans Rethinking Relationship With Schumer After Pompeo Incident
Tucker Carlson vs. Norman Eisen:
Lawyers Suing President Trump