Monday, July 31, 2017

Nancy Pelosi With Colleage Chris Wallace
Discussing Healthcare And Trump White House...

TLR -- If there was any doubt the interests of the Administrative State intersect with the guardians of the Swamp, well, this interview between two aligned swamp creatures should put those doubts to rest.

President Trump is preparing the “Big Ugly”; an omnidirectional political war against the entire DC enterprise of both Republicans and democrats, the UniParty. Those who are at risk from that political warfare huddle together in unity. Nancy Pelosi joins Chris Wallace to discuss the agenda:

If the readers of this blog do not want to sit through 11 minutes of Nancy Pelosi and Chris Wallace - below is a 50 second video - which is contained in the longer video but is the most important and truthful subject either of them had to talk about or say, along with the blog authors comments.

Nancy Pelosi Still Blaming Russia
And Comey For Clinton's Election Loss

Blog Author's Comments: People get judged by what they do. Look how they treat Trump and the American electorate. They are obstructionists for their own personal power. Pelosi's mind now lives totally in her secure long term bubble and she no longer receives and comprehends or analyzes new data. She believes she is fine with what she learned very early in her political career and along with the rest of the Democrats will never change. She is getting to be beyond pathetic along with her leftist politics. Chris Wallace is distressing with his loaded questions full of lies. Fox News is really not that much different than the rest of the mainstream media. How much trouble is this President in right now? That is the opening to the interview. You could have turned it off right there.

Pelosi during the interview, speaking about the vote on health care, said the people spoke, no; it was the swamp creatures, not the people. Congress needs both term limits and age limits. 1) Term limits. No staying longer than 12 years – both Senate and House. 2) Age limit – At age 76, you can no longer run for Congress in another election. Pelosi is much of the time incoherent but perfectly confident that others will prop her up. It really is too bad that Chief Justice John Roberts did not do his job. He had the chance and could and should have stopped the Obamacare mess in its tracks.

Nancy Pelosi is like so many politicians, they are lost in some fantasy. The President right now is doing whatever he can to add jobs and raise wages. Democrats are fighting every thing he’s done to get that accomplished. Pelosi said “I’m a master legislator…” Her brain is fried. I suspect because FOX will not join with the harder left media to begin pushing this phony “mend it, don’t end it”, we will next see Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and John McCain talking about bipartisanship. It’s hard to believe that a major political party would have such an incompetent person in Pelosi as a leader. But, then again, it is the Democrat party and if she is one of their so-called leaders this is good for the Republicans.

~ Links To More News ~

Donald Trump: Scaramucci Out As White House Communications Director

Devin Nunes Claims Obama Stooges Made Hundreds Of Unmasking Requests

DHS: Obama Gave Work Permits To 2.3 Million Migrants For 2016

Sunday, July 30, 2017

Material To Ponder For Today...

~ Links To More News ~

Trump Threatens To End Health Care 'Bailouts' For Insurers, Lawmakers

Liberal News Outlets Work Overtime To Hide A Huge Democratic Scandal

The Executive Orders That End Obamacare, Once And For All

Gun-Controlled Chicago Already Exceeds 400 Homicides In 2017

'This Is Our Flag': County Tears Down Memorial, Town Rebuilds It

Saturday, July 29, 2017

Recent Audio Clips From The Rush Limbaugh Show...

Trump Berating Sessions Is Hiding The Real Intention
Of A Full-Fledged Investigation Of 'Crooked' Hillary Clinton

"Mueller Has Already Starting Flipping People"

Political Cartoons

Friday, July 28, 2017

John McCain Casts His Legacy Vote Against The
American People, Votes To Continue ObamaCare...

TLR -- At 1:45am on July 28th 2017, Republican Senator John McCain together with Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins voted against the ObamaCare repeal in the Senate; ensuring the failing ObamaCare health care takeover and economic drag continues.

This should not come as a surprise. McCain has a legacy of voting against the American people to the benefit of his corrupt legislative corporate handlers. Yet, the vote was still blood-boiling in ramification and consequence.

Additionally, it should be noted for an accurate record that Nevada Republican Senator Dean Heller delayed his own roll call vote, skipped his name when called, until he was able to see that McCain cast the vote against America.

When Heller was safe – as in: able to hide his malicious intent and vote “aye” at the conclusion of the roll- he gave the appearance of support. A very typical albeit Machiavellian maneuver, customarily subtle and historically utilized by Senator Ted Cruz with few paying attention.

Senator McCain’s vote holds much larger ramifications than just the continuance of ObamaCare. Inherent within the retention is a reality that any tax reform, tax cuts to benefit the middle-class, will also necessarily be diminished.

The expansion of Medicaid within ObamaCare has, by intention and design, blown a massive hole in the federal budget.

When tax reform legislation is now proposed the CBO scoring will have to factor in a large projected need for additional tax revenue. This reality essentially dooms the middle-class tax proposal of the White House unless adjustments are made.

When considering the cost of ObamaCare and expanded Medicaid expenditures, it is now likely the middle-class tax-paying workers will not only have the cost of skyrocketing health insurance premiums locked in, but they will now need to contribute more of their tax dollars to subsidize Medicaid.
Blog Author's Comments: John McCain knows he won’t be around for another election hence it is safe to vote against the will of the people. We now know that there was no difference in voting for McCain or Obama in 2008. At least with Obama their party is falling faster in support. McCain's office says he will return to Arizona to start radiation and chemotherapy; will return to D.C. in September. Cranial radiation therapy has an extremely high rate of permanent brain damage, but it appears he has suffered from this for years.

Senate Republicans failed to pass a pared-down Obamacare repeal bill early Friday on a vote of 49-51 that saw three of their own dramatically break ranks. Three Republican senators — John McCain, Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski — and all Democrats voted against the bill, dealing a stinging defeat to the 'Skinny Repeal' of Obamacare. President Donald J. Trump tweeted: ‘3 Republicans and 48 Democrats let the American people down. As I said from the beginning, let Obamacare implode, then deal. Watch!’ McCain did this for his legacy as the 'Maverick.' Too narcissistic to realize it’s a 30 year history of lying to his constituents being forgiven because he’s supposed to be some war hero. He’s not. Hopefully he will be remembered with dishonor.

He has done everything he can to sabotage Trump's presidency, because of his extreme hate and jealousy of him. He knows this is probably the end of the line for him and this is the way he has chosen to go out. Just goes to show on whose side McCain is on. And the same can be said for Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, the three Senators who voted against the bill. If they talk like a Democrat, vote like a Democrat, than I consider them to be Democrats, all three of the RINO’s.

~ Links To More News ~

ACLU Uncovers Memos Showing Obama Admin's Spying Violated Civil Liberties

Legacy Media Refuse To Cover House IT Scandal Rocking Democrats

After Obamacare Repeal Collapses, Susan Collins Caught Trashing Trump

Quote For The Day: “Loyalty to country ALWAYS. Loyalty to government, when it deserves it.” -- Mark Twain

Thursday, July 27, 2017

"All Democrats Will Support It": #NeverTrumper Lindsey
Graham Working On Bill To Block POTUS From Firing Mueller

GP -- It’s been said the great threat to President Trump’s agenda are not the Democrat Party, but rather the GOP. Senator Lindsey Graham has proven yet again that this theory is likely true. POLITICO and NBC News report the South Carolina Senator is working on a bill that will have bi-partisan legislation to prevent President Trump from firing Special Counsel Robert Mueller.


"Sen. Lindsey Graham sent a sharp warning Thursday to President Donald Trump that it “could be the beginning of the end” of his presidency if he makes moves to fire special counsel Robert Mueller.

The South Carolina Republican, who in the late 1990s served as a House impeachment manager against President Bill Clinton, said Trump would be crossing a serious “red line” by ordering the ouster of the lead investigator who is probing his campaign’s ties to Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

“Any effort to go after Mueller could be the beginning of the end of the Trump presidency unless Mueller did something wrong,” Graham told reporters on Capitol Hill, where he outlined plans to introduce legislation next week that would move to block any Trump attempts to fire Mueller.

Graham said his bill — which he promised would have Republican support and “all the Democrats” — would mandate that any special counsel established to investigate either a president or his staff can’t be fired “unless you have judicial review of the firing."
The Washington Examiner Reported: That Paul Ryan spoke to Wisconsin-based radio host, Jay Weber on Monday and defended the witch hunt by Mueller, saying, “Remember, Bob Mueller is a Republican who was appointed by a Republican who served in the Republican administration who crossed over and stayed on ’til his term ended.”

“I don’t think many people are saying Bob Mueller is a biased partisan. He’s really, sort of, anything but,” Ryan continued.

“The point is we have an investigation in the House, an investigation in the Senate and a special counsel, which sort of de-politicizes this stuff and gets it out of the political theater, and that is, I think, better to get this off to the side,” Ryan said. “I think the facts will vindicate themselves, and then let’s just go do our jobs.”

“What we’re not focused on doing is spending all of our time on Russia, spending all of our time on this intrigue. We want to spend our time focusing on solving people’s problems,” Ryan said. “Working on the problems people care about, their problems. Not this stuff.”

Paul Ryan claimed he’s focused on the GOP agenda…which is laughable at best.
Blog Author's Comments: For anyone who does not already know, Special Counsel Robert Mueller has stacked his counsel with radical left-wing activist lawyers and his law firm gave 99.81% of their campaign contributions to Hillary Clinton. Yet Graham and Ryan see nothing wrong with that and the delving into President Trump's finances, even though this was supposed to be about, any so-called Russia collusion with the Republican Party. Quite interesting that the majority republicans bent over backwards, forwards and sideways, to accommodate President Obama but can't seem to stop jumping in line to rein in President Trump. Both Graham and Ryan are traitors to the president and their party.

Congress is intentionally sabotaging President Trump, this same Congress who refused to reign in Obama does nothing but tie Trump's hands and override separation of powers. What the limp-wristed Graham said he will try is unconstitutional, this will not be done. But now we have even more evidence what many within the GOP are concentrating on. Folks, it's about time to admit this is much worse than we thought. The RNC is clearly acting against Trump too. We need to continue our support for him and realize that both sides want him gone. Sadly, this president is the best we could have hoped for after surviving both Bush and Obama. The GOP cannot get their act together to pass meaningful legislation, but think about doing anything they can to stop the president from doing his job.

Three investigations on Trump, two by Congress that have found nothing, and one by a Special Counsel who is out to find anything they can. This is as political as it can be, and Ryan is denying the obvious and is right in the middle of it. There is no crime, therefore we taxpayers are paying for a special counsel, for reasons that do not exist. I'm sick of the GOP and their games. Mueller should be dismissed as soon as possible. I'd like someone on the White House staff and a few within the GOP Congress to keep pointing out loud and clear that there is no crime, so essentially Mueller is not necessary.

~ Links To More News ~

Sessions To Announce Investigations Into intelligence Leaks

House Judiciary Committee Clears Way For Investigation Into James Comey

Police Union President Faces Death Threats After Criticizing 'Black Lives Matter'

Wednesday, July 26, 2017

Debbie Wasserman Schultz's IT Manager Arrested Fleeing Country...

Townhall -- Imran Awan, the Pakistani IT vendor of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the former chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, was arrested by the FBI while trying to flee the country Tuesday, according to a Fox News reporter.

Fox News Capitol Hill reporter Chad Pergram tweeted about the arrest at Dulles International Airport, which he said stemmed from “bank fraud” charges:

According to Pergram, Rep. Wasserman Schultz responded to the news by terminating Mr. Awan: The investigative unit of the Daily Caller News Foundation reported Monday that Imran Awan and other members of the Awan family were under investigation by both the FBI and Capitol Police for “serious, potentially illegal, violations on the House IT network.” According to that report, the Awans had rented their former Washington, DC-area residence to a family while they departed for parts unknown. After discovering they had left “smashed computer hard-drives” and other computer equipment at the Lorton, Virginia home, the Awans tried desperately to retrieve them before they were seized by investigators, going so far as threatening to sue the renters.

The contents of the hard drives is unclear, but Imran Awan and his brothers are reported to have provided services as IT vendors for several House Democrats.

Pergrams tweets suggest that the central criminal violation involved embezzling IT budget money from House Democrats:

It is unclear what connection these allegations have to the reports of smashed hard drives and laptops now seized by federal authorities. An earlier report from the investigation appeared to show Rep. Wasserman Schultz prepared to go to bat against Capitol Police on Awan’s behalf, raising further questions about the nature of the computer equipment. Wasserman Schultz asked Capitol Police Chief Police Chief Matthew R. Verderosa to return a seized laptop to her, appearing to threaten “consequences” if he did not.
Blog Author's Comments: This could be the beginning of a big story, but the leftist media will no doubt ignore it because of a Democrat's involvement. Her laptop has something that Wasserman Schultz does not want the FBI to divulge. One would have to believe that there really is too much out there concerning the DNC and Hillary Clinton to just dry up and go away. This gets crazier by the week.

We have to know that the whole Trump/Russia fake news thing was concocted as a smoke-screen to distract from the real crimes, those committed by the Clintons, DNC and Obama White House and his people. The DNC looks more and more like a criminal organization every day. Can you imagine the secrets these people are trying so hard to hide? I would say the FBI should be doing a thorough investigation of them but they are infected with liberalism too.

Why would you hire two guys from Pakistan to be your IT managers? Ms. Wasserman-Schultz did everything she could to make this investigation go away. I wonder what is really happening here. She fired him? Apparently for getting caught because the only thing new here is him trying to leave the country and getting apprehended while doing so. Once the mainstream media runs with this story, if they even touch it, they will make Wasserman-Schultz the victim.

~ Links To More News ~

Nine Senate Republicans Vote Against Latest Repeal, Replace Obamacare Proposal

If Sessions Leaves, A New DOJ Sheriff Could Rein In Or Ax Mueller

Newly Declassified Memos Detail Extent Of Improper Obama-Era NSA Spying

Quote For The Day: "What Trump is talking about here is: Why aren’t these Republican committees, why aren’t these Republican investigators — why isn’t my attorney general — looking into Hillary Clinton’s crimes? If you’re gonna investigate what-all went on with Russia, how in the world do you leave the Democrats out of it? How do you leave Hillary Clinton out of it? The Republicans run the show! It’s time for the Republicans to start acting like it." -- Rush Limbaugh

Tuesday, July 25, 2017

Politically Oriented Videos & Links To More Political News...

Rush Limbaugh: Republicans Are Squandering
An Opportunity They Never Thought They Would Get

Judge Allows Trump Commission's Voter Data Request To Proceed

Trump: Sessions "Very Weak" On Investigating Clinton, Intelligence Leakers

President Trump Delivers Healthcare
Speech Targeting The Senate Inaction

Former CIA Director John Brennan Call For Coup If Trump Fires Robert Mueller

Levin: We'll Lose The Country If We Don't Have A Reawakening Of Americanism

Jared Kushner Delivers Statement To Media
Following The Senate Intel Committee Meeting

White House: Schiff Has Done 14 Hours Of TV Interviews Since Trump Took Office

Scaramucci Prepared To Clean House To Get Rid Of Leakers

WH Comm. Dir. Anthony Scaramucci
Interview By John Dickerson Of CBS News

It's Official: Baby Charlie Gard Is Now In The Final Hours Of Life

Rand Paul: I'll Vote To Proceed On ObamaCare Repeal

Sean Hannity Interviews VP Mike Pence On
Health Care: "An Opportune Moment To Make History"

Quote For The Day: Some folks who mocked government death panels are kind of quiet about Charlie Gard. -- Razor

Monday, July 24, 2017

Unbalanced Democrat Senator: Trump's Vote
Fraud Commission Is 'What Vladimir Putin Wants'

GP -- Senator Dick Durbin (D-Il) attacked President Trump’s vote fraud commission on Sunday claiming that asking voters for valid I.D. discredits our Democratic process which is exactly what Vladimir Putin wants…in case you were on the fence of whether liberalism is a mental disorder or not, this should convince you.

No, Dick Durbin, it’s the Democrats who discredit our Democratic process by fighting the peaceful transfer of power to the Trump administration citing bogus Russian conspiracy theories.

Dick Durbin sent out a tweet Sunday saying, ".@POTUS‘s voter fraud commission wants to suppress the right to vote and discredit our Democratic process. Exactly what Vladimir Putin wants"

— Senator Dick Durbin (@SenatorDurbin) July 23, 2017

I mean why not bring up Russia? It’s the Democrats version of ‘just add water’. ‘Just add Russia’ to every argument and it magically becomes a valid point.

According the mentally ill left, having voters prove who they are with photo I.D. and prove that they are American citizens discredits our Democratic process. The Democrats are the ones who discredit our Democratic process by continually allowing people to vote without proper I.D. The truth is, Democrats can’t win elections without dead people and illegal aliens voting, or other methods of voter fraud which is why they are terrified of Trump’s executive order.

Trump created the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity through an executive order in May, Fox News reported.

Several secretaries of state, Republican and Democrat, bucked the request or said they would only provide limited data.

Trump responded to the push back by saying, “One has to wonder what they’re worried about. There’s something, there always is.”
Blog Author's Comments: The Democrats continue to dig themselves a deeper pit, from which they may not be able to extract themselves. Yet wonder why they lose elections. They all have Russia on the brain because they believe this is a winning argument for them and also, this is all they have. I say let them continue with this and the same can be said for the huge arm of their party, the ‘fake news’ mainstream media. The Democrats lost the election of 2016 period. Little Dick Durban and his fellow mental midgets in their party know that if voter ID laws are enforced and followed, his party will probably be irrelevant. Democrats rely upon voter fraud to win many elections. The voter fraud commission sure scares the Democrats; I wonder why this bothers them so much?

The election fraud commission is the worst nightmare the democrats could have before the midterm elections. You need an ID to get welfare, any assistance anywhere in the government, but its okay to vote without it? Democrats, you are backing the wrong horse on this one. Your reign of terror is over for a couple of cycles. Let’s hope that more of the voters who were asleep at the wheel in 2016 will wake up and see just who the Democrats are and help us continue to take more of and keep this country for many years. Because the Democrats have no leaders, no plans and no arguments, they are reduced to making ignorant, childish remarks like Durbin’s. The democrats cannot open their mouths without bringing Russia into the conversation.

~ Links To More News ~

Clinton Scandal Only Deepens: So Why Is Trump, Not Hillary, Being Investigated?

President Trump Is Right About Jeff Sessions

FBI Seized Smashed Hard Drives From Wasserman Schultz IT Aide's Home

Exclusive: Trump Ponders Rudy Giuliani For Attorney General

Sunday, July 23, 2017

Andrea Mitchell Can't Recall A Single
Moment She's Shown Bias In Reporting

Truth Revolt -- It seems as though Andrea Mitchell has no memory of ever showing her bias while reporting. Let’s help her count the ways, shall we?

The MSNBC anchor was interviewed this week by fashion magazine Women’s Wear Daily and they asked her, “Do you feel that you’ve ever gone too far where you’ve shown bias in your reporting?”

Mitchell struggled to recall a single moment:
“Everything is subjective to a certain extent. Let me think about that. I’m sure there have been times where I have – either through not enough reporting or through some sort of incipient opinion – let something creep in. I can’t think of it.”
She did, however, manage to come up with one teeny-tiny thing, but you’d think it was a punch line of a joke. Mitchell actually said she was probably a little “too aggressive” with Hillary Clinton during the campaign.

*Cue laugh track*

Wait a second... Was Mitchell being “too aggressive” with Clinton when she defended her e-mail scandal?

What about the times Mitchell was critical of Israel? She drooled all over John Kerry, praising him for his work on a two-state solution while decrying Trump whom she feared might undo it all? Or the time she rolled her eyes while speaking about Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in an interview with Iran’s foreign minister? Or when she affirmed President Obama’s slap at the Israeli prime minister when she said, “Take that, Bibi.” Was that one of those moments something just “crept in?”

On air, Mitchell has expressed her dislike of the vetting process for refugees, slandered the entire South as racist after the Charleston church massacre, and even strangely questioned Texas Gov. Greg Abbot’s “supposed disability.”

You're welcome, Andrea, glad to help out.
Blog Author's Comments: Andrea Mitchell - that's not true, that's impossible. You have always been a far left talking head, with no talent aside from being able to read a teleprompter, and one who has not aged well. When you are a "useful idiot" or a "true believer" your warped leftist mind informs you that it is impossible for you to ever be biased in any way. You are always just simply right and those who disagree with you are evil and irrelevant. Is a fish aware of the water in which it swims?

Of course she tells the truth, her truth. She doesn't know there are differing viewpoints, at least by intelligent people, but she would never listen to us knuckle draggers. Mitchell is incapable of the truth. This is a prerequisite when working for a liberal media company such as MSNBC. Too cut her a small amount of slack - when you have literally countless moments in which you've shown bias in your reporting, it can be difficult to recall a single one. Mitchell is a leftist, which means she's a liar by trade and character, and this represents literally well over 90 percent of the news media.

~ Links To More News ~

Chuck Schumer Takes Shot At Hillary Clinton

ICE Director To Sanctuary Cities: ICE Is Open For Business

Jeb Bush Urges Republicans To Denounce Trump On Russia

Saturday, July 22, 2017

Reports: Trump Team Looks To Fight Back
Against Mueller's Overreach In Russia Probe

Breitbart -- President Trump’s team is reportedly looking at ways to push back against an apparently overzealous FBI special prosecutor Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible Russian interference in the 2016 election — putting together a case of Mueller’s team’s alleged conflicts of interest.

The New York Times reported late Thursday that the Trump team is engaging in what the paper called a “wide-ranging” search for potential conflicts, including donations from members of Mueller’s team to Democratic candidates, past clients, as well as Mueller’s relationship to fired former FBI Director James Comey.

Trump had hinted at such a tactic when he told the Times in an interview Wednesday that he believed there were conflicts of interests in Mueller’s team, and that he would make that information available soon.

In the same interview, he took a swipe at Mueller by saying that a day before Mueller was appointed special prosecutor, Trump had interviewed him as a potential replacement for Comey.

“He was sitting in that chair,” Trump said. “He was up here, and he wanted the job.”

In particular, the White House has expressed concern about Mueller going outside the scope of his investigation, particularly into the area of Trump’s finances. Trump himself expressed this concern to the Times: “I think that’s a violation. Look, this is about Russia.”

The Washington Post reported that Trump has been “fuming” about the possibilities of the probe asking questions about his deal-making before he was a candidate, and that was “especially disturbed” when he was told that Mueller would have access to several years of tax returns.

“If you’re looking at Russian collusion, the president’s tax returns would be outside that investigation,” a close adviser to the president told the Post.

Should Mueller dip into areas that are perceived as outside the scope of his investigation, it seems that Trump’s team are ready to fight back, by focusing on conflicts of interest.[...]

The Times reported Friday that Mueller’s team has requested IRS-related documents related to Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, from an investigation that was opened long before Trump’s campaign, and from which Manafort was never charged.

Trump has also reportedly discussed his authority to grant pardons in connection to the probe, although officials told the Post that he was only being curious about his authority.

“This is not in the context of, ‘I can’t wait to pardon myself,’” a close adviser told the paper.
Blog Author's Comments: From day one, the appointment of Robert Mueller as Special Counsel prompted major red flags. Mueller’s relationship with former FBI Director James Comey along with him building a team of pro-Hillary Clinton investigators simply cannot be ignored. Reuters is now reporting that two anonymous sources (no surprise there), say investigators are plotting to flip Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort to use as leverage against President Trump.

Robert Mueller cannot be trusted. According to former Speaker Newt Gingrich, who told Fox News Friday that the Special Counsel’s law firm made 99.81% of its presidential campaign contributions to Hillary Clinton. And we have been told by a few GOP conservatives in the Senate that Mueller is an 'honorable man' which is complete and total bull and nonsense. Also from Newt Gingrich: “The Mueller investigation has so many conflicts of interest, it’s almost an absurdity. The people he has been hiring are all anti-Trump lawyers, several of them have very bad records of hiding information from the defense and one case was rebuked by the Supreme Court in a 9-0 vote. It’s hard to understand why he would assemble such a team unless it was a deliberate effort to go after the President and the President’s team.”

This fishing expedition will guarantee that people in the heartland and those paying attention will never vote for the left again. They have over reached and do not understand the mood of the country. I realize that President Trump and his lawyers would have to jump through hoops to fire Mueller and end this absurd 'investigation' but do it. What does the president and the GOP have to lose? The left and the 'fake news' media already believe that Trump stole the election with help from the Russians. Robert Mueller and team have turned up nothing, and all he is doing is nothing more than opposition research, they'll leak inside information about the Trump family and finances to try and spoil and harm the Republicans campaign for the 2020 election.

Tucker Carlson Is Worried About
Robert Mueller's Russia Witch-Hunt

Friday, July 21, 2017

Even Liberal Whites Cause "Race Fatigue"...

Moonbattery -- To the many crimes the European race has inflicted against persons of politically preferred pigmentation we can now add race fatigue:
A New York University librarian recently bemoaned the “racial fatigue” she experiences “in the presence of white people” following an academic conference.

April Hathcock, a Scholarly Communications Librarian at NYU, recently attended the annual American Library Association [ALA] conference in Chicago, a trade conference for people in the library profession.

Right after the conference, Hathcock took to her personal blog to describe her “Post-ALA Race Fatigue,” lamenting that she was suffering from “serious race fatigue” after spending five days amongst her colleagues…

“Race fatigue is a real physical, mental, and emotional condition that people of color experience after spending a considerable amount of time dealing with the micro- and macro-aggressions that inevitably occur when in the presence of white people,” Hathcock wrote. “The more white people, the longer the time period, the more intense the race fatigue.”

While Hathcock noted that she is normally exhausted after such conferences for reasons unrelated to racial issues, she said that this time she “hit her limit” after spending five days “being tone-policed and condescended to and ‘splained to.”
She groused about “nice white ladies” who had the audacity to tell her to be “civil” and “professional.” The racists.

If any countermoonbats attend ALA conferences, they are sure to keep very low profiles. Yet even liberals are too white to be endured.

It probably never occurred to April that white people suffer from race fatigue too, and that she might not like the symptoms that develop.

Blog Author's Comments: Some advice on how April Hathcock could cure her ‘race fatigue’. Try to avoid people of different color if you possibly can. We all will be much happier. Coexist black person, coexist. You simply will not allow us to not think about you every second, will you? I am starting to think they cannot or refuse to assimilate here in America but it's just a hunch. And civility and professionalism are not racism; they are civilization.

Ms. Hathcock, what is your endgame? You've told us everything, over and over again, except the answer to that one simple question. And I believe that only a black female could get away with racial hatred like this and still keep her job. She is now a 'Scholarly Communications Librarian', really? Sure sounds like an affirmative action position to me and it was probably created by those white people she does not seem to like. This may be another failure of affirmative action and hiring through the quota system.

I am extremely tired as countless others are of the many blacks complaining about the white people. This is also ‘race fatigue’ for us. If this job is too much for April she could always try something else where she would not have to deal with the Caucasians. Perhaps she could work from her home. Or, maybe not working at all like many of her fellow blacks. They all seem to be eating well, kicking back and relaxing, with little stress and 'race' or mental fatigue.

And just maybe if she would attempt to get some regular exercise on a daily basis, this could also help with her problem. Exercise does seem to help clear the mind of the many problems that are bothersome. And this would also assist her in dropping at least 50-75 pounds. And then she may feel better both physically and mentally about herself and the white people.

~ Links To More News ~

Mueller's Investigation Must Be Limited And Accountable

Special Counsel Mueller Goes Fishing, Expands Probe Into Trump's Businesses

Trump: Comey Used 'Phony' Dossier On Trip To Moscow As Leverage To Keep Job

Thursday, July 20, 2017

Recent Audio Clips From The Rush Limbaugh Show...

Three Liberal Women Who Call Themselves
Republicans - They Are Running The Senate

If We Repeal Obamacare, "It's The Wild West"

Republicans Just 'Assume' Everybody
Knows Obamacare Is Bad And Has To Go

Blog Author's Comments: I have been against the recommendation of Jeff Sessions as our Attorney General since I first heard his name being bantered about. I said it was a mistake, there were and are some much more qualified people who should have this extremely important job. Now President Trump knows he made a mistake. I would not be disappointed if Sessions would meet with the president and offer his resignation.

President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he never would have appointed Attorney General Jeff Sessions had he known Sessions would recuse himself from the Russia investigation..

"Sessions should have never recused himself, and if he was going to recuse himself, he should have told me before he took the job and I would have picked somebody else," Trump said.

"Jeff Sessions takes the job, gets into the job, recuses himself, which frankly I think is very unfair to the president," he said. "How do you take a job and then recuse yourself? If he would have recused himself before the job, I would have said, ‘Thanks, Jeff, but I'm not going to take you.'"

"It's extremely unfair — and that's a mild word — to the president," he said.

Trump also criticized Sessions' answers during his Senate confirmation hearing. Sessions had said that he had not met with any Russian officials, despite meeting twice with Russian Ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak.

"Jeff Sessions gave some bad answers," Trump said. "He gave some answers that were simple questions and should have been simple answers, but they weren't."

Additional Comments: It is time for President Trump to remove Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his entire cabal of Trump deniers and liberal lawyers. What does he honestly have to lose? Mueller has no limit on the amount of taxpayer money he can spend, or where he can go into the Trump family business dealings and can take as much time as he wants to do this.

What is being done is the assembly of a huge amount of documentation for the Democrats and the leftist media to use as ammunition in the run-up to the 2020 election. They will twist, turn and lie concerning whatever they see or hear and swear it to be true, and Trump cannot sue all of them for libel. Mueller just wants to go fishing, and look at the finances' to see what is there. That has to have been illegal for generations, he needs to be specific about what he wants and why.

Whatever Mueller and his staff have gathered will eventually be leaked and used against Trump. And I do not doubt that Mueller could well write a book concerning what he has learned about the President and slant it anyway he chooses. I do not trust Mueller and never have.

This was a terrible idea from the beginning. When we were told he was an honorable man, and chosen by the DOJ to clear up the ‘Russian Collusion’ fiasco and lies against the president and Republican Party. Mueller was supposed to be looking at the so-called Russia meddling in the election. So why are there no limits on him, his staff and what can be investigated? I say cut him lose and demand everything he and his people have gathered.

~ Links To More News ~

Mueller vs. Trump: Probe Reportedly Eyes Business Transactions, Despite Warning

Clinton Emails: Judicial Watch Going To Court For New Emails From State Dept.

Napolitano "Americans Are Entitled To Know What Rice Did"

Quote For The Day: "I have studied many philosophers and many cats. The wisdom of cats is infinitely superior." -- Hippolyte Taine

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

Paul Ryan's Approval Rating Plummets As
Speaker Fails To Deliver For President Trump

Breitbart -- House Speaker Paul Ryan’s failure to deliver on President Donald Trump’s agenda has sent his approval rating into a tailspin as nearly a majority of Americans disapprove of his job performance, a new Bloomberg National Poll shows.

A whopping 48 percent—nearly a majority—view Ryan in a negative light, while just 36 percent view him in a positive light in the Bloomberg poll released Tuesday. The poll was conducted from July 8 to July 12 and represents a near mirror flip from Ryan’s standing back in December when 47 percent looked at him positively and 31 percent viewed him negatively.

“It would be hard to find a Republican who has suffered more than House Speaker Paul Ryan as Congress and President Donald Trump have struggled to turn GOP promises into reality,” Bloomberg’s Anna Edgarton and John McCormick wrote on Tuesday, adding:
More people now view the House speaker in a negative light rather than a positive one, 48 percent to 34 percent, according to a Bloomberg National Poll, conducted July 8-12. In December, 31 percent held a negative view, while 47 percent looked at him favorably. It’s a dramatic turn for one of the Republican Party’s biggest stars and its 2012 vice presidential nominee. The approval rating decline for Ryan is the largest among GOP leaders measured by the Bloomberg survey — and exceeds the drop in approval for the party, Congress and Trump.
Pollster J. Ann Selzer, who conducted the survey, said this is a remarkable drop-off for Ryan. “It’s unusual to see this big a flip, especially for a guy who is somewhat behind the scenes,” Selzer said. “But he’s in charge of Congress and Congress is not delivering.” During the timeframe of December to July, President Trump has dropped from 50 percent to 41 percent in net favorability, and the Republican Party dropped from 44 percent to 37 percent. The Democratic Party has remained steady at 42 percent net favorability. [...] Ryan’s drop-off in popularity coincides with the failure of the U.S. Senate to pass a bill that simultaneously repeals and replaces Obamacare.

The Senate’s latest iteration fell apart Monday night, and in response, President Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called for a clean repeal of Obamacare now followed by a bipartisan replacement plan later. Ryan, offered the opportunity multiple times to back this new play at a press conference on Tuesday morning, doubled down on the failed GOP congressional plan.

This all comes after Ryan failed multiple times himself this year to get the American Health Care Act (AHCA) that repeals and replaces Obamacare simultaneously through the House. Ryan infamously had to call off a Floor vote amid his failure to win enough support for the bill among his own colleagues. But then, while Ryan was traveling in Hollywood and Europe, House Freedom Caucus chairman Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) joined with Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), who was the co-chairman of the House Tuesday Group at the time, to patch an amendment together that won enough support to pass a new version of the bill through the House.

Meadows has now backed President Trump and Majority Leader McConnell’s new plan to pass a clean repeal now and a replacement later. Ryan refuses to support the president and Senate GOP leadership.

Paul Nehlen, the Republican candidate in Wisconsin’s first congressional district, who is running against Ryan for his congressional seat, is calling on Ryan to step aside so President Trump can move forward with his agenda:
Blog Author's Comments: Paul Ryan must be replaced. He is impeding the will of President Trump and the American people. He has failed the people again and again. He is obviously a puppet for his globalist and industry donors. He has an agenda that is in opposition to our president. Trump wants less immigration. Ryan can be bribed into any increase, including federal jobs for illegal aliens. Trump wants Obamacare gone. Ryan seems to like the big government control it gives him and has not done much for its repeal. Trump wants tax cuts and I cannot see Ryan pushing the House members for tax cuts. Why are we, or better yet his fellow House members, not screaming to get rid of Ryan and put a conservative Speaker in his place? We are wasting precious time.

Just remember how long it took for Ryan to say that he would back President Trump. He and many others in the GOP including McConnell did not believe that Trump would defeat Clinton in the general election. This voter is extremely pleased that Trump is our president and desperately wants to do what is right for our country. On the other hand I don’t believe Ryan feels the same way. He does not like Trump and was disappointed when he defeated Clinton. I am convinced that Ryan had plans to coast for four years and then run for the presidency in 2020. His chances of that happening are slim to none. The voters see what he is and has done and he may be lucky to hold his House seat and the speakership. I for one and apparently if one believes this poll, many others do not want him as a member of the Republican Party. He has been no help to president Trump or the people who voted for the president.

There are many members in the House and Senate who will never accept President Trump as one of their own. He is not and will never be part of the so-called 'Establishment.' They don't want to see him and will try to stop him from having a successful presidency. Many do not want him to show them how to accomplish the goals that are the best for America and many will even allow our country to be taken down and put back into the hands of the Democrats. There were three GOP Senators who said they would definitely vote against a full repeal of the ACA, Susan Collins of Maine, Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. I would assume they are quite pleased with themselves. With a 52-seat majority, Republicans can afford to lose only 2 votes, which would set up Vice President Pence to break a tie. And we cannot forget all of the Democrat Senators who want to keep Obama's disaster of a bill that many of them voted for. So, as President Trump said, let it die and this will be on the hands of the Democrats. And Obamacare is quickly dying which Obama knew it would.

~ Links To More News ~

Weak-Kneed Ryan Stalls National Concealed Carry Reciprocity

All He Does Is Fail: Reap What You Sowed, Mitch McConnell

What Americans Care About vs. What The Media Cares About

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Links To Recent Political News And Videos...

Missing From The Russia Intelligence Report: The Word 'Podesta'

Anti-Trump Group Protesting Against NRA - Protected By Armed Guards

The Order Appointing Special Counsel Mueller Is Tainted

Border Wall Construction Set To Start Earlier Than Expected

Details Emerge In Suicide Of GOP Activist Who Sought Hillary Clinton Emails

New Poll Confirms That America Hates Hillary

We're All Being Pretty Quiet About Obama's Failures, Aren't We?

CNN Headline: A Second-By-Second Analysis Of Trump-Macron Handshake

Comey's Writing A Book, And Publishers Are Eager To Pay Big Money For It

Trump, McConnell, Pence Call For Full, Clean Obamacare Repeal

Intelligence Agencies Claim Power To Veto President's Advisors

CNN Airs Video Of Jihadi Sniper Shooting American Soldier

Quote For The Day: The Senate Democrats have only confirmed 48 of 197 Presidential Nominees. They can't win so all they do is slow things down and obstruct! -- Donald Trump
Pence Rips Congress Over Failure To
Repeal Obamacare: The Time To Act Is Now

Mark Levin On The Deep
State Plus A Message For Trump

Monday, July 17, 2017

James Carville: There Is 'No One' In Charge Of The
Democratic Party, Senate Changes In 2018 Look Bleak

GP -- Democrat strategist James Carville sounded the alarm recently about the Democrat Party saying that “no one” is in charge and that he is not optimistic about the Democrats taking back the Senate in 2018.

Sunday, on New York’s AM 970, Carville commented that “no one” was in charge of the Democrat Party.
"[If] a party is out of power and we don’t have a presidential candidate there is no one going to be in charge until sometime in 2020 when we choose a presidential candidate. I think right now most Democrats are trying to focus on the 2018 elections and trying to recruit people and keep incumbents, and, you know, I would say we have a pretty good chance of taking the House back. The Senate is very, very difficult."
Carville, commenting on the Senate, brought up some of the most basic facts that Democrats seem to be avoiding the painful reality of:
“The problem in the Senate is we have a large number of seats we have to hold in states that Donald Trump carried. Indiana, Missouri, you know, places like that we have to hold seats.”

Blog Author's Comments: We could almost forget about the people like Carville and the Democrat Party for now, if the Republican’s would put their energy behind what has to be done and what their voters cared about, instead of promoting themselves and grandstanding. They would not now be struggling like they are. I believe that Donald Trump's base will continue to support him, they want him to be successful and they know where the problem is within the GOP.

"James Carville: Dems Face an Uphill Battle if They Want to Win Back the Senate in 2018" It seems as if the many hard right Republicans and Democrats combined, already have control of the Senate. If you factor in John McCain, Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, Lindsay Graham, Susan Collins, Roy Blunt, John Cornyn and John Thune. These people are controlling the Senate. This is the real reason the Senate cannot get a repeal bill completed and to President Trump’s desk to be signed into law, or any other Trump inspired campaign promise for that matter.

Is it too much to expect that while Trump is the president a few RINO’s will lose their primaries to newcomers and the GOP can have some fresh minds in the Senate? At this point in time the Republican Party is fighting against President Trump more than the Democrats are. The GOP has a showdown brewing within itself. The Never Trumpers against the Pro-Trump people and it does not seem as if the divide is small.

And we still have the Democrats and the strong arm of their party, The Mainstream Media, who will not come to grips with the fact and themselves, that Hillary was a terrible candidate, ran a bad campaign and is a dangerous and extreme person, which is part of the reason that Donald Trump now occupies the White House.

"Trump Has Nothing But The
People That Voted For Him"

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Dem. Sen. Schiff: Democrats Wrong To Get Help From Ukrainians...But!

Blog Author's Comments: Senator Adam Schiff is a Democrat hack and part of the proverable Washington swamp. This guy has President Trump and the Russians living in his brain 24/7. No one has shown any hard evidence that the Russians did anything to change the outcome of the presidential election. If his mother is still among the living, would she tell her little son that Hillary Clinton and the Democrats lost on their own? That Clinton was a terrible, corrupt candidate and will never ever be our country's president. It is worth being politically happy about that.

What the Russians did or did not do and Donald Jr's meeting with the lawyer are two different things. Does anyone actually think the Russian's are ignorant enough to send a lawyer to Trump Tower? She acted on her own and used the offer of Clinton dirt to get her foot in the door. If she did this to help anyone, it was the Democratic Party.

The Republican Party now has the White House, Senate and House. They are in power and it is up to them to straighten out their in-fighting problems and help the president accomplish what they are being paid to do. if not, I certainly hope the voters will not forget, who the culprits were, when they are running for reelection.

Adam Schiff's tweets:

-- Don Jr.’s emails are about as clear evidence as you could find of intent by the Trump campaign to collude with the Russians.

-- Was Trump campaign doing privately what candidate Trump called for publicly? They wanted dirt on HRC and these were efforts to obtain it.

The Republican Party and the Trump people did not require any Russian help to obtain 'dirt' on Hillary Clinton. What she is guilty of is very obvious. But, former Director of the FBI James Comey is very much left leaning and was and is afraid of Obama, former AG Loretta Lynch and the Democrats to tell the DOJ, there was ample evidence to bring charges against her.

Quote For The Day: I've been looking up CNN employees for over an hour and amazingly, I haven't found one single conservative -- Jack Posobiec

Saturday, July 15, 2017

MSNBC's Joy Reid Asks And Answers Own
Question To Guest About Trump Jr. Meeting

Legal Insurrection -- Joy Reid has done it again, shutting down on her MSNBC show this morning yet another conservative guest who tried to get in a word edgewise. This time it was former CIA analyst Fred Fleitz in the unenviable position of trying to make the case that the meeting between Trump campaign aides and Russians wasn’t the horror the left is making it out to be.

Reid first asked him for his comments, but before he could get started, proceeded to cut him off, launching into her own monologue. When Fleitz asked if he could respond, Reid replied “No. No you cannot, until I’m finished answering the question.” Rightly retorted Fleitz: “you asked me a question and now you’re responding for me.”

As Reid continued to stonewall him, Fleitz observed:“this is a rigged interview.”

The most revealing moment came when Fleitz told Reid “you do not want the other side of the story to get out.”

Reid gave away her game:“what other side of the story could there be?”
Blog Author's Comments: Reid is another of the liberal so-called journalists who is willing to sell her soul to the Democrat plantation overseers. She is one of their useful class, (i.e. right race, sex, shade) for diversity. I guess this is what got her the show with one of the far left 'news organizations.'

What is interesting to me is that these same people were feeling tingles up their legs when Obama said he’d meet, without conditions, the leaders of Cuba, North Korea, and Iran. How wonderful, they gushed. He’s so open-minded and serious and thoughtful. He’s thinking outside the box, and that’s just what we need.

And we will not forget how they cheered his and Hillary’s Russian “reset”. But I guess that was different somehow. This is yet another example of the Left’s propensity to “dish” without being able to “take”. They’re cowards and should be made to feel that way every single day they go ‘on the air’ and make fools of themselves.

Quote For The Day: "We ... deserve [EPA Chief Pruitt's suggestion for a public climate debate], especially since every proposed solution involves raising our taxes, damaging our economy, and making citizens more submissive to federal and global bureaucracies.

Reuters helpfully labels Pruitt “controversial,” journalese for “we don’t like this guy.” But I’m curious what disagreement believers in apocalyptic climate change will offer to Pruitt’s idea, outside of mockery and #science hash tags. They’ll try to dodge a free and fair debate, since their “argument” has been mocking skeptics, equating them with Holocaust deniers, and suing them into silence. That strategy has only emboldened the doubters. And the eco-doomsdayers’ storied track record of bad predictions has hardly won them converts.

“If you’re going to win and if you’re so certain about it, come and do your deal,” Pruitt said. “They shouldn’t be scared of the debate and discussion.”-- Jon Gabriel

Friday, July 14, 2017

Loretta Lynch's DOJ Granted Russian
Lawyer U.S. Entry After Visa Was Denied

Townhall -- New information surrounding Russian "crown prosecutor" Natalia Veselnitskaya, the woman who met with Donald Trump Jr., Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and now White House Senior Advisor Jared Kushner at Trump Tower in June 2016, is raising serious questions about how she got into the U.S. at all.

Six months before the June meeting, which Trump Jr. agreed to after being offered damaging information about Hillary Clinton as part of the "Russian government's support" for his father, Veselnitskaya was denied entry into the U.S. A few months later, she was granted rare entry by the Department of Justice under Attorney General Loretta Lynch. Veselnitskaya argued her entry to the U.S. was crucial in order to carry out her legal work for a Russian firm in New York City, yet engaged in a number of other projects or interests during her time in the U.S.

With this revelation, Lynch is backing away from the situation and denying knowing anything about it.
In a statement, a spokesperson for Lynch said the former attorney general “does not have any personal knowledge of Ms. Veselnitskaya's travel.”

The U.S. Attorney’s office in New York told The Hill that it let Veselnitskaya into the country on a grant of immigration parole from October 2015 to early January 2016 after her initial request for a visa had been denied.

Court records show that when Veselnitskaya sought permission to extend her stay, the U.S. attorney at the hearing told the judge that the special visa the Russian lawyer received was part of a “discretionary act that the statute allows the attorney general to do in extraordinary circumstances.”

The U.S. attorney described the grant of parole immigration as extremely rare.
Meanwhile, Obama administration officials from a number of agencies are shifting the blame for the situation.
Blog Author's Comments: It is ironic how all the real crimes of Russian Collusion, obstruction of justice and criminal wrongdoing, are not in the President Trump administration, but in the Obama administration, with serial offenders such as Obama, Clinton and AG Lynch etc. It seems that this was a trap set for Donald Trump Jr. only to continue this charade of Russian involvement in the election.

By now, most intelligent people should have grown tired of it. But, this is all the Democrat Party and mainstream media have, playing their blame game. The Democrats may again insist upon another investigations and this one could well lead back to the Obama regime. Everything we are currently seeing are desperate attempts to create smokescreens and an overall sense of moral equivalence. The Left knows full well what is coming, should actual investigations take place on any number of fronts. So, they are doing everything they can to create a scenario where they can point fingers and claim the Right is guilty and 'Trump stole the election.'

I don't expect Mueller to be the one to bring down the Democrats, Lynch or Obama, I do not believe he wants to prosecute any liberals. I expect him to have to stop when he realizes going further will incriminate them. But, other investigations Congress is undertaking could be a different story. I applaud the truth that may finally come out that Obama was the worst ‘President’ to disgrace the White House and his people were just as bad while following his orders. This entire Russian thing is a cover up and a way for the liberals to attempt to delegitimize Donald Trump's presidency.

~ Links To More News & Video ~

Obama Set Up Donald Jr. In Faux Scandal To Justify Spying On Trump

Woman Charged With Hate Crime For Telling Iraqi Muslim He Is Not American

Lessons From The Veselnitskaya Affair

Obama DOJ Allowed Russian
Lawyer Into U.S. Without Visa

Thursday, July 13, 2017

Ralph Peters Makes The Mistake Of Comparing
Tucker Carlson To A 'Nazi Apologist' To His Face

BizPac Review -- Tuesday’s edition of Tucker Carlson Tonight featured a heated exchange between Fox News analyst Ralph Peters and host Tucker Carlson during which Carlson found himself on the wrong end of a classic ‘false equivocation’ fallacy, courtesy of his guest.

Because no, wanting to work with Putin and Russia on mutual goals is NOT the same as supporting Adolf Hitler and the Nazis during the 30’s – but believe it or not, that’s where Peters went.

As any follower of the show knows, Carlson’s position on Russia is more pragmatic than today’s liberal bandwagon ‘cold-warriors’ allow. Since the country is arguably the second or third most powerful global presence and since they have vital interests in the Middle East, particularly Syria, and a strong mutual interest in eliminating ISIS, the world’s greatest threat, why not work with them?

After all, the United States once worked with the world’s most prolific mass-murderer – Joseph Stalin.

But Lt. Col. Ralph Peters didn’t talk about Stalin. Instead, he jumped right to the classic liberal slander – Adolf Hitler and the Nazis.

“He [Putin] is malevolent and he is as close to pure evil as I can find,” said Peters. “He’s also brilliant. I don’t understand what any American would want an alliance with Russia. We should be strengthening our alliance with democracies instead of trashing NATO — we should be building it up much more strongly.”

“He’s a shady guy,” Carlson responded. “Hard to see why he’s a threat to us. How many wars can we fight at once? Why not just accept that people who are bad people share our interests and side with them?”

“You sound like Charles Lindbergh in 1938 saying Hitler hasn’t attacked us,” said Peters, which really set Carlson off.

“I beg your pardon. Slow down for a minute. I am not in any way, you cannot compare me to someone who would make apologies for Hitler? And I don’t think Putin is comparable to Hitler.”

When Peters insisted he was, Carlson called it a “grotesque overstatement” and “insane.”

“You just compared me to a Nazi apologist because I asked a simple question. Slow down! Slow down! Which is, why not contravene American interest with a group trying to kill ISIS?”

Peters then tried to argue why Putin was just as bad as Hitler, ostensibly because people have died in the Syrian civil war in which Russia has chosen sides.

Peters did “take back” the Lindbergh comparison, but still insisted that Carlson sounded like an “apologist from 1938.”

False equivocate much?

Watch the exchange below:

Blog Author's Comments: I have seen Lt. Col. Ralph Peters a few times on Fox and honestly don't know why they put up with the guy. He has been irritating since he was first hired by Fox as a guest analyst. I am sure they could find another 'level headed' military person to take his place and do a more credible job, while not always wanting to argue with the host. He has always seemed to me as though he has a chip on his shoulder and no one should question anything he says. I was somewhat surprised when I saw this interview, Peters was seriously unhinged. There are people like him who actually want to press war with Russia.

I believe with President Trump, diplomacy with the Russians can go a long way and you have to give it a chance to work. Neither the U.S. nor Russia wants a war. When President Trump proves that diplomacy does not work, then you go to stronger measures. The problem is the last Administration was so weak, Putin had to be laughing at us and the 'war hawks' are seeing Putin and United States relations like it was with Obama. They need to calm down let Trump work his negotiation skills and just maybe he can get Putin to vacate his thoughts on the Ukraine and also deal with other issues. More distrust will only lead to some conflict. And I see this as important - that there has been no proof - that Russia had any impact on the 2016 presidential election.

I could never do Carlson's show, because I don't have his calm, persistent clarity of statement that he had with Peters and has with so many of his guests. Tucker Carlson has a good show. I always thought Peters was at least a patriot. Exposure is good for the country. Over the years Peters has acted like he knows a lot more than he really does. His insolence and arrogance has completely turned me off especially when there are a number of more knowledgeable ex-military consultants. Where we can use Russian cooperation is with Syria, ISIS and in Ukraine.

I trust the Trump cabinet to make deals without giving the country away (or our uranium away.) Ralph Peters is a retired Lieutenant Colonel and as I recall worked in the intelligence field. I thank him for his service. Maybe he received as much 'face time' as he once did because of his "hard right" views which help to balance the views from the center and the left shows on Fox. Judging from the times I have watched and listened to his rants on the network it now seems that he is making fewer appearances.

~ Links To More News ~

House GOP Allocates $1.6 Billion For Trump Border Wall In 2018

FBI Document Dump Reveals Secrets Of Bogus Clinton Probe

Pelosi Says: Schumer And I Are 'The Voices For Winning' Back Congress In 2018

The American Left's Downward Spiral

Wednesday, July 12, 2017

Donald Trump Jr. Interview With Sean Hannity...

TLR -- Donald Trump Jr. appeared on Sean Hannity’s TV show to discuss the controversy of his meeting with a Russian attorney named Natalia Veselnitskaya during the 2016 presidential campaign.

Both former campaign manager Paul Manafort and campaign adviser Jared Kushner reported the meeting on their various compliance forms, however Donald Trump Jr. is not within government and did not have any requirement to identify the meeting.

And being a bit inquisitive and curious I share this. At the heart of the current media Russian narrative du jour is a story about Donald Trump Jr. meeting with a Russian attorney named Natalia Veselnitskaya. That meeting took place on June 9th 2016 in Trump Tower.

Now it is discovered via video and images, that only 5 days later, June 14th 2016, Ms. Veselnitskaya was a guest of former Obama administration Russian Ambassador Michael McFaul in Washington DC for a House of Representatives hearing on U.S. Policy Toward Putin’s Russia.

Blog Author's Comments: The Democrats and mainstream media will continue to go after anything and anybody who is tied to the president if there is the slightest chance they can be the one to sink Trump's presidency.

And this statement nailed it as well: Both former campaign manager Paul Manafort and campaign adviser Jared Kushner reported the meeting on their various compliance forms, however Donald Trump Jr. is not within government and did not have any requirement to identify the meeting. So they can’t rant and rave unless they are attacking Trump’s children: First Eric, then Ivanka, a bit on Barron, and now on Donald, Jr.

This sounds clearly like a set-up. I suspect this was all the so-called “evidence” the Democrats ever had. They built it up, and kept beating the drums while they hoped to find more. After witnessing this lunacy and the hatred that spawned it. The Democrat party is now dead. I will never forget what they have done to this country over the last 8 months and the previous 8 years.

And, if those establishment Republicans think we’ll forgive them for deposing the president over bogus charges and insinuations and that we’ll revert to voting for the GOP as the “lesser of two evils”, they should think about it some more. Take down Trump and they take down the Republican Party.

~ Links To More News ~

Who Is More At Fault? Hillary Or Donald Jr?

Obamacare Collapse Takes New Form: Number Of Uninsured Surges

Hillary's Running Mate Tim Kaine Accuses Donald Trump Jr. Of Treason