Friday, June 30, 2017

So Who Is 'Presidential'? Donald J. Trump, Of Course...


American Thinker -- For the last several years, if you disagreed with President Obama or the Democrat agenda on immigration, gay marriage, gender bathroom rights, climate change, higher taxes, more regulations, you could be called xenophobic, sexist, racist, homophobic, and stupid.

Or to put it in brief form, as Hillary Clinton did, "irredeemable" and "deplorable."

If you dared disagreed with anything in the climate change agenda, you were called "a denier," and the public was told that you shouldn't be listened to.

Members of the Tea Party were compared to domestic terrorists.

And these days, if you dare try to fix the rapidly collapsing Obamacare, you are said to want people to die.

It has been shown that CNN and other media outlets have been willing to just make stuff up to go after Trump just to improve their ratings. Most positive things President Trump has done on energy, regulations, immigration, NATO, trade, and the Veterans Administration are virtually ignored. The New York Times intentionally targeted former Alaska governor Sarah Palin through false news reports after a congressman was shot.

Morning Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski have compared President Trump to Stalin and Hitler.

But Trump tweeted some negative stuff out about Joe and Mika, and the media decided that that needed massive coverage, and it is Trump who is described as "unpresidential."

We Americans know what incivility is. Trump's tweets don't even measure up to what we Americans have been through.

Blog Author's Comments: I think to the Left, being "Presidential" is all about the optics and the narrative. They do not seem to recognize hard work, long hours and results. They do, however, call out a good man who tells the truth. How many times have we seen the media attack Trump over something he said which later turns out to be true? But, the same people will say nothing while the deceivers and hustlers call Trump the most vicious things and want to fake outrage when Trump responds one time in the same language.

Being a "presidential" Republican means to the left, being insulted on a daily basis and not defending yourself. I look back on the election of Donald Trump and can only smile. I don't think the tweets about Mika and Joe were necessary as anyone with a brain wouldn't watch them anyway. But I sure don't fault Trump for not taking it lying down. The media has been and is against all things Republican/Conservative. For years they have cowed Republicans/Conservatives with their non-stop bias. Finally, someone - Donald Trump - has taken a stand and the media just doesn't know what to do.

Rubio, Bush, Kasich, and probably even Cruz, would have wilted under the onslaught and been afraid to do anything but cower and hope the next day the media would treat them better. The next day, the media, empowered by the cowering would just continue and ramp up the rhetoric. Not Trump. He hits back. And I am all for it. The free pass for the media has to end. Hit them and hit them hard. I watched snippets of the tripe Mika and Joe continuously spewed about Donald Trump and they have nothing to complain about.

Nothing like a little balance on the public stage instead of the one-sided 24/7 assault the media has gotten away with. Every day with Trump is a good day for me. He makes people squirm and uncomfortable; especially those that have had the field for far too long. And the far left-wing media such as CNN and MSNBC attempt to outdo each other in their war for ratings using the president as their target. All of the mainstream media are the same, just another arm of the Democratic Party and liberal hate groups.

~ Links To More News & Video ~

CNN's Latest Retraction Is Just The Tip Of The Fake News Iceberg

Melania Reminds Media The President Punches Back '10 Times Harder'

Obama Choked On Russia Long Before The 2016 Election

New York Times Corrects Story Claiming 17 Intel Agencies 'Agree' On Russia

President Donald Trump Again
Labels CNN As "Fake," "Fake News."

Thursday, June 29, 2017

Project Veritas Interviews Van Jones:
"the Russia thing is just a big nothing burger"...

TLR -- (New York) - Project Veritas’ American Pravda: CNN continues today with a video of left-leaning political commentator Van Jones caught on camera plainly stating that “the Russia thing is just a big nothing burger.”


This follows the release of a video of CNN Producer John Bonifield, who was caught touting the Russia narrative as “bullshit.”

Blog Author's Comments: “Nothingburger” is a lame and pathetic term, but plain liberal propaganda is more to the point, we are in a coup. I am surprised that the self-avowed Communist Van Jones is considered a top CNN commentator. But, I guess with them it does fit. I would not give Van Jones or the CNN producer John Bonifeld any credit for admitting what they were and are doing is wrong. No one at CNN or any other MSM outlet has absolutely any ethics, and thus deserve no respect. CNN should be held legally responsible for their misinformation and the problems it has caused. But, they do it for the money it brings them and forget about any journalistic standards they may have.

This helps to explain why those of us who are not 'mind numbed robots' cannot stand to watch most of - or anything - the mainstream media spews anymore. And Van Jones is a chameleon who has the ability to morph into whatever persona earns him the most money. I have seen videos of him speaking very much like Louis Farrakhan, and many have all seen him as a CNN regular with the leftist bent, but normal dialogue. He is someone who will work the angle that will bring him the most prominence. Race is also a convenient fact of life for him. He will also play that card. I guess the real question is, when will Turner Broadcasting finally fire the architect of the phony Russia CNN coverage, Jeff Zucker? But, I don't believe the network will ever change. This is what they do and apparently they have their low-information viewers.



~ Links To More News ~

CNN Tries To Move Forward After Its Latest Humiliation

New York Times Newsroom To Walk Out, Decrying Direction Of Paper

Trump's Revised Travel Restrictions Start Thursday Night

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Shepard Smith Defends CNN, Credits Them For Practicing 'Journalism 101'


Truth Revolt -- Fox News’s Shepard Smith thinks CNN is being treated unfairly in the wake of publishing, then retracting, an unvetted story and gave the biased network a vociferous defense on his program.

Smith was audibly disgusted after watching the White House briefing on Tuesday with Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who was filling in for press secretary Sean Spicer, in which she nailed CNN for trying to tie the Trump administration to Russia with an unfounded story. Smith asked for Wall Street Journal associate editor John Bussey’s thoughts on the matter.

“Unusual. More ring-fencing of the White House against the press,” Bussey said.

“What are they doing?” asked Smith in disbelief. “I know they need a foil.”

“Yeah, I think it’s a, you know, desire to build a wall around the White House to limit inquiry into what they do, accountability, and you have a chance to criticize the press,” Bussey added, saying CNN handled the situation exactly how a media organization should.

Smith agreed, stating, “It’s like an example of how to do it. If you make a mistake, Journalism 101 says you admit your mistake, you correct it immediately, and you take corrective action. And that’s what they did.”

Bussey said the Trump administration could actually learn something from CNN’s example and start retracting things they get wrong.

“Depends on what your goal is,” Smith concluded. What's your goal, Shepherd?
Blog Author's Comments: Both Fox News Shepard Smith and John Bussey of the Wall Street Journal are '#nevertrumpers'. If Shepard Smith thinks that what CNN did was Journalism 101 he clearly didn't follow the story. The story, which reported that Congress was investigating a "Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials," cited a single anonymous source. These types of stories according to CNN are typically reviewed by several departments within the network, including -- fact-checkers, journalism standards experts and lawyers -- before publication. But CNN used a single anonymous source to attack the Trump administration with this story without vetting it in any meaningful way. CNN then tried to erase the story once it was discovered to be an outright falsehood. And only after it was pointed out that CNN was trying to hide their own reporting did they own up to it. Mr. Smith, if that's Journalism 101 then it was an example on how to attempt to plant a lie but not get away with the continual 'fake news'.

Also, my educated guess is that one of the three people who were fired was CNN's anonymous source. They had no real source or tip. They made it up to attack the president. They lied. The FCC should revoke Jeff Zucker's broadcast license for CNN. Shepard Smith is just as fraudulent and fake like CNN and bashes President Trump every chance he gets. He should have left with Megan Kelly. They make a typical phony journalistic pair. Smith must believe Fox will never remove him from their network -- now that he has come out of the closet. And don’t doubt me, Fox News is quickly going in the same direction as all the rest of the television networks.

Shepard Smith: "...If you make a mistake, Journalism 101 says you admit your mistake, you correct it immediately, and you take corrective action. And that’s what they did...” Making a mistake is one thing - that happens to all of us. Maintaining a news organization built on partisan hacks, distortions, lies, fake news, biased reporting, and then lying about it is a whole different story. The only reason CNN came clean was this particular lie was because it was so outrageous they could no longer hide the fact it was totally fake. So fake in fact, those three high level employees had to resign over it. That's far more than making a simple human error. This one was a lie engineered from the start, but to their dismay it blew up on the launch pad.

Shepard Smith is a foolish and senseless leftist -- defending the profligate CNN will not earn him any points with President Trump and his people or conservatives. Smith does not seem to understand that someone saying they were wrong does not necessarily signify they mean it. Smith is an unhinged militant gay and he actually belongs at CNN or MSNBC. Smith has an oversized ego and he is a legend in his own mind. Like all liberals this drama queen is continuing to sink lower in the minds of the people who want truthful journalism and researched news.

~ Links To More News & Video ~

GOP Senator Says Mueller's Hiring Spree Taints Entire Russia Probe

CNN Faced $100 Million Lawsuit Over Botched Russia Story

Trump Spox Suggests That CNN Is A 'Disgrace To Journalism'

'You Are Fake News!'
Trump Blackballs CNN's Acosta


Quote For The Day: Takes too long to watch CNN newscast. Every time they do a story, you have to spend 20 minutes Googling to see if it's true. -- Mark Simone

Tuesday, June 27, 2017

Political Sunday Talk Shows For - June 25, 2017...


Kellyanne Conway Interviewed By Little George Stephanopoulos



Sean Spicer Interviewed By Howard Kurtz



HHS Secretary Dr Tom Price Interview With Dana Bash



President Trump Interviews With Fox And Friends



Eric Trump Interview With Maria Bartiromo


~ Links To More News ~

Trump Turns Collusion Charge On Obama For Doing 'Nothing' On Russia

Trump: Supreme Court Decision A Clear Victory For, National Security

Build A Wall, Around The Welfare State For Non-US Citizens

Trump Roasts Fake News Media After CNN Resignations

Monday, June 26, 2017

Grassley: Schumer Knew Trump Was Not Under
Investigation When He Publicly Claimed Otherwise

Daily Caller -- Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) blasted Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer Thursday for lying about President Donald Trump being under investigation when he knew otherwise.

Senator Grassley showed his disgust for the Democrat party, the fake news media and James Comey for continuing to mislead the public about President Trump being under investigation. James Comey refused to declare to the public that President Trump was not under investigation and Chuck Schumer continued to publicly state he was when he knew otherwise.


Grassley: “After that meeting, I publicly called for Mr. Comey to tell the public what he had told us about whether President Trump was under investigation. The public had a right to know. Mr. Comey told me and other Congressional leaders that President Trump was not under investigation. He even told the President himself–repeatedly. But, Mr. Comey didn’t listen to my request for transparency. He didn’t listen to the President’s request. Only months later has the truth finally come out.”

“So the media was wrong. So the Democrats were wrong. So the wild speculation and conspiracy theories ended up harming our country. They played right into Russia’s hands. And how did we all learn about this truth? In President Trump’s letter removing Mr. Comey from office.”
Blog Author's Comments: At least Senator Grassley finally spoke up and went after Schumer. Senate Minority Leader Democrat Chuck Schumer wanted to keep this lie going as long as he could. But what was stopping Majority Leader Mitch McConnell from announcing it himself? Certainly they were not sworn to secrecy by Comey. And if they were it was way past time to let the people know the truth and give the president a little help. We can expect this from Democrats but so many of the Republicans stood in the background and said nothing when they also knew Trump was not under investigation.

And the Republican Party really has to seriously get busy with regard to President Trump's agenda for the country and show the voters they want to retain the power they now have. And why don't they use it to their advantage? I am extremely disappointed in many of them. President Trump did not have to do this - run for the presidency - and put himself and his family through the sick ridicule and humiliating comments and treatment he has received. He knew and saw what was happening to America and someone had to stop the Democrats and turn things around. He did our country and his voters much more than a huge favor by stopping Hillary Clinton and the Democrats from continuing to trash the country, but he is not receiving a hell of a lot of help from some members of his party.

A few Republicans are stepping up to the plate for the president, but just a few. And they have known about this lie concerning Russian collusion for as long as Schumer has. Why didn't they say anything then? Why wait for this investigation? They could have stopped this a long time ago. Those GOP members in the gang of 8 are just as responsible for not coming out and defending the president. It only took Trump to fight back for the truth to be revealed. Very few members of the GOP Senate were willing to lift a finger to help him. It's as if they still think we are all so bloody daft and forgetful. Well, no more, those days are long gone. President Trump has awakened a great deal of those who consider themselves on the right and we will not forget any of this during the next election. But, now Mueller is able to investigate anyone and everyone, he has an unlimited budget and can hire whomever he cares to. This, the country and the president did not need.

There are also many members of the House who are in collusion against the president. This places some of them in jeopardy because Trump does not have to play their game. He has and will continue to call people out and expose more of what we should know. He is and will always be fighting off the 'fake news' networks and their people, who on many occasions are creating their own stories from nothing, writing and broadcasting fiction, in an endeavor to personally attack him, for the good of their people the Democratic Party. Lastly, when he continues to follow his campaign promises that is what the president should do. We are not used to seeing this. But never expect Democrats to respect the truth or tell the truth. They would rather make things up as they go and will lie without a care when it is for their side and in their favor.

~ Links To More News ~

CNN Refusing To Comment To Its Own Reporters About Fake News Scandal

Democrats Push Leaders To Talk Less About Russia

Mueller Team Approaching Size Of Entire US Attorney's Office For Rhode Island

Sunday, June 25, 2017

Recent Audio Clips From The Mark Levin & Rush Limbaugh Shows...


Obama Needs To Stop
Tweeting. He Sounds Like An Idiot!



"Not Only Is Obamacare Here To
Stay, But Single-Payer Is On The Way"



WAPO Story Portrays Obama
As A 'Spineless, Linguini Wimp'



'Blood Money' Is What Democrats Are
Raising Since The GOP Baseball Shooting


~ Links To More News ~

Julian Assange Explains Why The Democratic Party Is Doomed

Number Of Refugees Admitted To U.S. Drops By Almost Half

Obsession With Russia Conspiracy Theories Could Haunt Democrats In 2018

Kennedy Retirement Rumors As Supreme Court Nears Finish Of Work Session

Saturday, June 24, 2017

Gowdy Incensed, Wants To Know Who Leaked Coats' Testimony...


Free Beacon -- Rep. Trey Gowdy (R., S.C.) appeared incensed on Thursday that someone leaked Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats' private congressional testimony and made it clear that he wants to know who is responsible.

Gowdy explained to CNN's Erin Burnett how he and the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Adam Schiff (D., Calif.), told Coats that their conversation would not be selectively leaked. Since then, it has been.

"What I found out, Erin, is that about eight hours ago Adam Schiff and I looked Dan Coats in the eyes and we assured him that there would be no selective leaking of his testimony to us and I'll be damned if eight hours later there aren't three different leaks with what he told us," Gowdy said.

Gowdy went on to say that this was an example of why congressional investigations are not taken seriously after telling Coats that no selective leaking would occur.

Gowdy told Burnett that he knew he did not leak it and would highly doubt that Schiff did, as Schiff was a former federal prosecutor and because he also told Coats that it would not be leaked. Gowdy said that there were over a half dozen other individuals in the room who knew what Coats said.
Blog Author's Comments: I can understand why Gowdy would be upset and wants to know who told the press. But, nothing will be done to the leaker if they do find him. And we do not need anymore useless ‘investigations’ and ‘hearings’. The GOP and Trump are already tied up with so much of this. The people want some action and the president’s agenda worked on, so let's forget all of the in fighting between Republican lawmakers and those who do not get their way, or believe their ideas are the only ones that should be considered.

There were only four Democrats in the room, so it should not be so difficult to determine who the leaker was. Perhaps those in the room during the meeting should be asked to undergo a Polygraph test to see if this helps to flush out the leaker. But, I would not dismiss Schiff so easily as a possibility, Schiff has lied publicly claiming there was evidence of collusion with the Russians and Trump administration and then had to backtrack off of that. I like Trey Gowdy and hope that Gowdy and crew, and all the other Republicans start to understand the people's contempt for their inaction on trying to restore respect for law and the Constitution. There are quite a few of the Republican members of Congress that better wake up, and soon.

How can the American people have any confidence in the government, in governmental agencies, or government officials with this and all the other lies and innuendos that goes on? No one ever gets prosecuted for any wrong doing in the government, just more congressional meetings and people running in front of the cameras telling the liberal and corrupt press their side of whatever story or subject matter makes news at the time.

~ Links To More News ~

House To Vote On Illegal Immigration Laws Next Week

We Are Witnessing The Implosion Of The Democrat Party

FBI Closing In? Bernie Sanders' Wife Gets A Lawyer

Friday, June 23, 2017

Trump: No Welfare For Immigrants For At Least Five Years...


Truth Revolt -- President Trump brought the house down Wednesday night during his speech in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, particularly when he laid out some new plans on immigration.

“I believe the time has come for new immigration rules which say that those seeking admission into our country must be able to support themselves financially and should not use welfare for a period of at least five years,” the president said.

Legislation will be presented for that “very shortly,” Trump added, standing in front of banners that stated “Promises Made, Promises Kept.”

But that’s not all:
“Another core principle is that those coming to our country must embrace our values and love our people.”
NBC News noted that a Bill Clinton-era policy already exists, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, which bans immigrants from receiving federal benefits for five years. But the report also pointed out that “the law has exceptions and additional legislation since its passage has also affected eligibility.”

Right. So it needs to be fixed.

Trump also told supporters that the plans for building the wall might include solar panels. He quipped, “This way, Mexico will have to pay much less money.”

It was clear that NBC News reporter Ali Vitali couldn’t hide his disdain for the president in his report, calling Trump’s speech “rambling” and chiding him for “bashing Democrats.”

We get it, it’s tough to be on the losing team.
Blog Author's Comments: Immigrants should not be allowed to enter the United States unless they get in line and begin the legal process towards becoming a citizen of the country. Other immigrants, who are coming here to work for an existing company, and are educated and skilled, should be doing so legally and only for a specified amount of time. This notion of flooding into the U.S. to live for "free" off of our welfare system in exchange for voting democrat is insanity.

And what about addressing the millions of illegal aliens already in the U.S. on welfare? These people are getting public subsistence with everything from food to education and housing. While I agree with President Trump's recommendation, he and his lawyers currently have a case before the Supreme Court, based on his Executive order 13769 suspending for 90 days the entry of certain aliens from seven countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. People from these countries are not allowed into the country until they are thoroughly vetted.

These are countries that had already been identified as presenting heightened concerns about terrorism and travel to the United States. This case should not even be heard by the high court except for the liberal Democratic judges that issued a stay on President Trump's Executive order. They, because of their political leanings apparently would rather take the chance of letting someone into the U.S. who may kill and maim our people. The existing laws we have to control illegal immigration are not being enforced and those that are already here continue to live their illegal alien lives unabated at our expense.

Now, if only the Republican Congress could come to some agreement and pass the needed legislation on other very important bills so that the president can sign them into law. There will be zero help from the members of the Democratic Party. As I have said many times, Trump cannot do these things himself. And I do not believe the members of Congress should take their 'August break' until they actually accomplish some of the items on his agenda as they are being paid to do.

~ Links To More News ~

FBI Briefing On The GOP Shooting Couldn't Have Been More Bizarre

Debbie Wassermann Schultz Accuses Top Obama Official Of Lying

Most Americans (On All Sides) Now Agree Bias Infects The Media

Leaker James Comey Spotted Entering The NY Times Office

Quote For The Day: "The FBI’s briefing appears so contrary to the facts as to be insulting. When a man with a history of hating Republicans cases a location, takes pictures, verifies the targets are Republicans before opening fire, has a list of Republican politicians in his pocket, and shoots and nearly kills Republicans, it’s hard to swallow the FBI’s contention that the shooting was “spontaneous” with “no target.” The agency should reconsider whether it wants to troll Americans about something this serious." -- Mollie Hemingway

Thursday, June 22, 2017

Political Videos & Links To Political News...



Democrat Rep. Moulton "We Need
New Leadership" Across The Board


Mueller's Empire: Bottomless Budget, Limitless Jurisdiction

"No Evidence Of Trump
Collusion With Russia" - Trey Gowdy


Anger Privilege: Only Leftists Are Allowed To Be Angry

Newt Gingrich On Meeting With
House GOP, Calls To Exclude CNN


Even NYT's Brooks Admits Russian Collusion Story Is A Scam

Democrats Haven't The Slightest
Idea How To Beat Donald Trump


Concealed Carry Reciprocity Has 200 Backers In Congress

The Trump 'Referendum' That Wasn't


Pelosi Faces Growing Doubts Among Democrats After Georgia Loss

Mark Levin: Lesson Of The Georgia
Sixth Is 'It Doesn't Seem To Matter’


Quote For The Day: "...the narrative with Bernie Sanders is he's for the people, he just wants everyone to get a fair break, he thinks the rich take advantage of the middle class and the poor and people should have free healthcare and free college and so forth and so on. Bernie Sanders is a radical Marxist who believes in violence, there I said it -- every radical Marxist believes in violence, every radical Marxist believes in violence. Can you think of one country where the radical Marxists have taken over the governments that isn't violent?

Oh I know they preach humanity and compassion and equality and helping the poor, and the middle class, and all -- but can you show me one Communist country that is any of that, that is any of that. Show me one Communist country that is not in effect a police state. You going to show me China? It's a police state. you have no free access to the internet, there's no free speech and so forth and so on. You're going to show me Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea? What? And yet socialism is an off shoot of Communism, it certainly is. They're different degrees and they are violent -- the communists." -- Mark Levin

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Senile Senator John McCain Claims That The
Russians Have Hacked Obamacare Replacement Bill...


DownTrend -- Six term Arizona Senator John McCain’s decreasing mental capacity is becoming more difficult to conceal on a near daily basis.

The old man who is losing his marbles was still trying to rebound from a bizarre Senate Intelligence Committee Q & A with former FBI Director James Comey when he went, slipped the bounds of reality again on Tuesday.

The octogenarian politician – who if he were a horse would have been euthanized long ago – unleashed a bizarre and paranoid comment regarding the Senate’s ongoing overhaul of the disaster that is Obamacare.

McCain suggested that while his allies in the Democratic party haven’t seen the new bill that the Russians have hacked into congressional computers and obtained critical information on the replacement for Obama’s crowning of a healthcare catastrophe that only screws productive people and small businesses.

The Hill is reporting “McCain: No American has seen healthcare bill, but I’m sure Russia has”:
"Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said he hasn’t met an American who has seen the Senate Republicans’ healthcare bill yet, though he’s “sure the Russians have” gotten their hands on it, Bloomberg reported.

Asked Tuesday whether he has seen a copy of the legislation, McCain said he has not.

“Nor have I met any American that has,” he added, according to Bloomberg. “I’m sure the Russians have been able to hack in and gotten most of it.”

McCain is one of a number of senators growing frustrated with Senate Republican leaders’ efforts to draft the healthcare overhaul measure.

Both Democrats and Republicans in the Senate have complained that Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has crafted the bill largely behind closed doors and without the input of his fellow lawmakers."
McCain’s obsession with Russia and the nefarious conspiracies that the media continues to promote would be one thing for an ordinary senior citizen but this is one of the most powerful members of the United States government.

It’s been increasingly apparent that McCain is unfit to continue to serve and he continues to prove it every time that he opens his mouth.

At what point does the Senate start to strip this pathetic old man of all of his power when it comes to matters of war, national security and foreign policy?
Blog Author's Comments: It was a huge win for the GOP in Georgia yesterday, much to the chagrin of the Democrats and liberal media. Now, I move on to Arizona and Senator John McCain. It is way past time for a special election in Arizona in an attempt to oust McCain. He really does need to be put out to pasture so he cannot continue to make a fool of himself and be a member of the Republican Party. But because this is his sixth term in office I have to ponder the mental capability of the Arizona voters who continue to reelect him.

President of Russia, Vladimir Putin lives in McCain's head rent free, while the tired old man fantasizes about WW3. McCain is like the bitter actress no one wants anymore, the Jane Fonda of politics. He is never going to be an admiral, or fly jets again, or be president, or be sworn in for a seventh term, or accept his diminishment with grace and dignity. He should at least be asked to undergo a competency hearing. Yet Sen. John McCain is the Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. We can and should be able to do better than McCain. I do respect his service to our country as a prisoner of war in Vietnam, but he has played that card far too long. And he does what he can to be a constant thorn in the side of President Donald Trump.

~ Links To More News ~

Democrats Choke In Georgia After Record
Spending On Failed
Ossoff Campaign

Report: DNC Staffer Seith Rich Likely Targeted
By Experienced Killer,
Not Random Robbery

Conway Thanks Those Who 'Snarkily'
Called Georgia Race A
'Referendum' On Trump

Quote For The Day - "So the Department of Justice has written 'a sitting President is constitutionally immune from indictment and criminal prosecution' ...

Thus, this entire preposterous discussion about whether Trump obstructed justice (which he did not) is entirely irrelevant for criminal investigative purposes."-- Mark Levin

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Chris Matthews: Trump Voters Embrace Archie Bunker Stereotype...


Breitbart -- Monday on MSNBC’s “Hardball,” host Chris Matthews said the combination of the Hollywood’s sensitivity to LGBT issues and the Archie Bunker parody of conservative views has caused President Donald Trump’s supporters to embrace the Bunker character.

Matthews said, “Hollywood, the news business is very careful about gender identity, about sexuality. We are very careful with the language we use. Very careful about the LGBT concerns generally. Do you ever see that same sensitivity about white working class people? I grew up in a country that made fun of those people.”

“Archie Bunker was that guy,” he continued. “Hollywood greatly enjoyed making fun of this guy. He was probably Irish, but they didn’t say so. He lived in Queens. So I think Hollywood made a point of enjoying that difference in a way that got to them. And they said, ‘OK, do you want me to be Archie Bunker, I’m voting Republican this time. I’ll stick with you guys.'”
Blog Author's Comments: Chris Matthews embraces the "meathead" stereotype - dead from the neck up. I also suppose he misses the "tingle" he felt up his leg whenever he heard Barrack Hussein Obama speak for eight years. And the "meathead" Rob Reiner has changed, but is now even more of a far left liberal than they would allow him to play years ago. I miss Archie Bunker and what he said and stood for. Today, they would write the show so that Carroll O'Connor could not play the Archie Bunker many of us enjoyed.

Chris Matthews is not even one of the top shows of MSNBC. But, I believe he could do better if he would shut the hell up and gear down his mouth to allow his 'guests' a chance to answer his questions. Instead, he is constantly interrupting them. I have never watched the network aside from the on-line videos. I think he seemed to be subtlety pointing out liberal racism. Liberals are sensitive to some groups but insulting toward others.

What the Obama administration and his media did was lay the pathway for Donald Trump to step in and wake up the silent majority. Here was and is someone who said what so many Americans had been desperate to hear. This is more proof the left doesn't know who the Trump voters are, and they do not want to know. It seems like every time I read an article by the left they are calling Trump voters names. Or the news shows are constantly disparaging Trump voters. They are still actually wondering how Hillary Clinton lost the election. They don't seem to have a clue, they have simply ramped up their liberal/leftist rhetoric with hope that this will help the Democratic Party in 2018 and 2020.

~ Links To More News ~

Levin: Trump Cannot Be Indicted, Say DOJ Memoranda

Democrats To Stall Senate In ObamaCare Protest

MSNBC Host Taking Heat After Tweeting About Scalise's Shooting

Monday, June 19, 2017

"Trump Under Investigation Narrative" Begins Falling Apart --
ABC: No Mueller-Trump Investigation

TLR -- Almost every intellectually honest political observer recognized the Washington Post report about President Trump being under investigation appeared manufactured on the thinnest of available anonymous precepts.

In the wake of the Post report, when Asst. AG Rod Rosenstein delivered an unanticipated press release stating not to trust media reports from “anonymous officials” all doubt was essentially confirmed. There is no ‘there’ there; and President Trump was not/is not under investigation. Just another failed media attempt by The Washington Post to undermine the administration, with a blend of partisanship designed to generate an ideological self-fulfilling prophecy.


Toward that end, and to put a final nail in that manufactured narrative coffin, ABC news correspondent Pierre Thomas reported today that Special Counsel Robert Mueller is NOT investigating President Trump:
WASHINGTON - Special counsel Robert Mueller hasn’t decided whether to investigate President Trump as part of the Russia probe, according to a report on Sunday.

“Now, my sources are telling me he’s begun some preliminary planning,” Pierre Thomas, the ABC News senior justice correspondent, said of Mueller on ABC’s “This Week.” “Plans to talk to some people in the administration. But he’s not yet made that momentous decision to go for a full-scale investigation.”
Yes, that means the prior Washington Post report was entirely false; which makes that one of the numerous times CNN, The New York Times, or the Washington Post has run a report that was entirely false. They know it, it’s not false by accident – it is false by design. Just like the previous battle in the intelligence community, there is a battle between Black Hats and White Hats within the U.S. Justice Department’s (FBI and DOJ) unelected career bureaucracy; and the media is on the side of the opposition, the usurping black hat team.

Top Trump Lawyer Weighs In
On Ongoing Russia Investigation


Blog Author's Comments: Since President Trump is not under investigation, is Mueller’s hiring of high level attorneys that were Clinton Foundation members and Democrat donors, to make sure that the Clinton's are protected? Apparently Mueller wants or needs the input from Clinton advisors.

Who thought Mueller was a good idea with his close ties to Comey? And can the Republicans stop using hold over’s from the past administration? Trump should not be Mueller's target, but he’s still only one ambitious corrupt Clinton lawyer away from some sort of set-up, and they are dragging down our President and his work, while many in his administration are sitting on their hands waiting to observe what transpires. I am not holding my breath to see if the Mueller army will prove helpful. A special counsel is not used to coming back in three months to say 'sorry, we did not find any problems.' They are used to gather and provide information to prosecute someone or recommend a penalty. As long as Donald Trump is our president, the constant attacks and quotes from 'anonymous sources' coming from the Washington Post, NY Times, CNN etc. will continue.

I am not convinced of Mueller’s high morals. He should have refused this job based on his conversations and close ties with Comey. Yet, I see and hear so many on our side tell us what a fair and honest person he is, that this is no fishing expedition. I want the Washington Post, New York Times, CNN, CBS, NBC, and ABC to have to pay for all these investigations. Once they are over, I want to see a Class Action Lawsuit against every one of them stating malicious intent in their slander and libel against this administration. Let them pay back the money wasted of taxpayer dollars that should be going to useful projects. In the meantime the Democrats and liberals are accomplishing the only item they are able to do, and that is to put up as many roadblocks as they can to attempt to stop Trump from making even more progress with his agenda.

So far, I don't see this impacting Trump's base of voters and those who are loyal and believe in him and what he can do for America. Trump himself has accomplished quite a lot in his short time in office. Too bad the Republican Congress cannot get anything done. I have to wonder who within the administration and Republican Congress can be trusted to put their jobs on the line, to help President Trump achieve some of the items he campaigned on and what the people who voted for him want?

~ Links To More News ~

Is Bob Mueller The Establishment's Stalking Horse?

How The Deep State Built Its Field Of Dreams

Gingrich On Mueller: 'You Tell Me Why I Should Relax As A Republican'

Wins For President Trump Under Reported By American Press

Sunday, June 18, 2017

No, Hodgkinson Did Not Use An Assault Rifle...

Moonbattery -- It is appropriate that a fanatical supporter of Bernie Sanders would use an SKS for his shooting spree. At the height of the cold war, Sanders was the Mayor of Burlington, and decorated his office with the flag of the Soviet Union. He aggressively sided with Soviet clients in Central America, and even spent his honeymoon in the drab and miserable USSR. Designed in 1943, the SKS was used by the Soviet Red Army before it was rendered obsolete by the AK-47.

Contrary to media reports, it is not an assault rifle. Unlike the AR-15, the SKS does not even look like one. It is a semiautomatic of dated design that holds 10 rounds in a fixed magazine (although modified versions can hold a detachable magazine). You might call it the communist answer to the M1 Garand. The SKS was not covered under Bill Clinton’s assault weapon ban. After BLM moonbat Micah Johnson used an SKS to murder five Dallas police officers, CBS News described the gun as a “curio or relic.”

Yet the media, ever eager for a pretext to go after the AR-15 (a.k.a. America’s Rifle), keeps reporting that James Hodgkinson used an assault rifle to shoot Rep. Steve Scalise.

The Chicago Tribune called the gun “an SKS assault rifle.” That’s like calling someone’s sedan “a Toyota Camry truck.” ABC News barks that Hodgkinson used a “legally purchased assault rifle.” It may have been legally purchased, but it was not an assault rifle.

Some outlets mixed up the SKS with other guns that could legitimately be called assault rifles. CNN absurdly called the SKS “a Chinese-made variant of the popular AK rifle,” although at least they corrected the mistake afterward. CBS News confirmed that the gun used was an M4 carbine, which does not even vaguely resemble an SKS.

Keep all this in mind the next time you are tempted to take anything the media says at face value. If they are this clueless and/or deceptive about guns, chances are good the same is true on other topics.


Blog Author's Comments: Why are these so-called, self described, intelligent media people so ignorant about firearms? If they don't know, they should educate themselves. But, that would take away from the time they have to plant more false stories from anonymous sources. It didn't help when Sen. Rand Paul stated the shooter used an AR-15 as he described the incident he witnessed.

Whenever there is a shooting event, the media usually begins to describe the weapon the shooter used as a horrifying 'AR-15' or a dreaded 'Glock'. Both of them are semi-automatic weapons, and not 'assault' weapons. One has to pull the trigger for each round that is fired. I consider an assault rifle as a fully-automatic weapon. And I most certainly agree as the article states, "if they (the media) are this clueless and/or deceptive about guns, chances are good the same is true on other topics."

~ Links To More News ~

Can A President Be Prosecuted For Exercising His Constitutional Duties?

Acting ICE Chief: Zero Regrets Over Saying Illegal Aliens "Should Be Concerned"

Secretary Of Defense Mattis Blames Obama For Failures In Afghanistan

Saturday, June 17, 2017

Recent Audio Clips From The Rush Limbaugh Show...


Trump Is Being Turned Into One Of The
'Most Powerful Presidents In Modern Times'



The Case For Trump: "I Hope 'You'
Can"; Trump Clearly Deferred To Comey



Sarah Palin May Have A Libel
Case Against The New York Times


Deep State's Massive Effort To Destroy Trump
Fox News’ Sean Hannity on Friday night slammed news outlets like The New York Times and CNN as “willing accomplices” for the deep state that is intent on damaging President Trump’s presidency by leaking, in many cases, misinformation to the American public.

“The major news outlets, citing unnamed sources, “have all gotten it wrong on this issue,” Hannity said. “They all, at this point with the American public, should have zero credibility.”

The “deep state,” an alleged shadowy network of powerful entrenched federal and military interests, has increasingly become the focus of Republicans who accuse such forces of trying to undermine the new president. Though senior White House staff members don’t use the exact label, the notion behind it has taken hold.

To Trump’s critics, these assertions come off as paranoid fear of a non-existent shadow government and an effort to create a scapegoat for the White House’s struggles. But to Trump’s supporters, this represents an overdue challenge to an elite ruling class concerned only with maintaining its own grasp on power.

Hannity said the public should take these “smoking gun” reports that appear to break every night “with a grain of salt.”

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said Thursday evening that Americans should "exercise caution" before believing anonymously sourced reports, an apparent reference to ongoing leaks surrounding the investigation into alleged connections between Russian officials and Trump's campaign.

"Americans should exercise caution before accepting as true any stories any stories attributed to anonymous 'officials,'" Rosenstein said in a statement, "particularly when they do not identify the country — let alone the branch or agency of government — with which the alleged sources supposedly are affiliated."

“Of course, the deep state exists. There’s a permanent state of massive bureaucracies that do whatever they want and set up deliberate leaks to attack the president,” said Newt Gingrich, a Trump confidant, earlier. “This is what the deep state does: They create a lie, spread a lie, fail to check the lie and then deny that they were behind the lie.”

Hannity said the deep state hopes for “as much collateral damage as possible.”
~ Links To More News ~

Extremism Experts Are Starting To Worry About The Left

Democrat Asked To Resign After Declaring Republicans Getting Shot Is 'Funny'

President's Grant And Truman Both Fired Special Prosecutors

Friday, June 16, 2017

Gregg Jarrett: Mueller Needs To Resign, "This Is
The Kind Of Stuff Over Which Lawyers Get Disbarred"



GP -- FOX News legal expert Gregg Jarrett suggested yesterday that Robert Mueller should disqualify himself from special counsel due to his relationship with James Comey.

The special counsel could not find any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia so now they are going for obstruction of justice charges according to the latest deep state leads to the liberal media.


Donald Trump responded to this ongoing witch hunt.

He asked about Hillary’s crooked dealings with Russia.

And Hillary Clinton’s obstruction of justice.

Gregg Jarrett says Mueller must recuse himself.

Gregg Jarrett: If you look at the special counsel statute it says you cannot serve as special counsel if you have a personal relationship with someone who is central to the case. If this Washington Post story is true, it’s now Trump against Comey. Comey is now the star witness, the key witness against Trump. Well, guess what? Comey and Mueller are longtime close personal friends, partners, allies. They were joined at the hip at the DOJ and FBI. It’s a mentor-protege relationship. How is this fair to Donald Trump because Mueller is now going to decide whether to believe his good friend or the man who fired his good friend...This is the kind of stuff over which lawyers get disbarred.
Blog Author's Comments: Robert Mueller was named special council to handle the Russian investigation. And because of President Trump's comment to the then Director of the FBI James Comey, concerning Michael Flynn - that Trump said he hoped Comey could let it go. Mueller is also looking into this. But - Comey did nothing about it or act on Trump's mention of Flynn. But Mueller's gang is also digging into this and whatever else they think they can do to make a case against Trump. Muller has already hired 13 lawyers and plans to hire more. He is a close friend of James Comey. This is not going to be over soon because he and his staff will carry this at least through the 2018 midterm elections and I have little doubt through President Trump's entire first term. Mueller and the crooked Hillary-connected gang that he stacked his ‘independent’ investigation with, are running a kangaroo court. Mueller is truly leading a 'witch hunt' to take down a President who was duly elected by the people. And I might add we now have the best and most qualified president we have had in many decades.

The Mueller examination is corrupt and I believe the American people stand with Trump. Most of the people, who actually care about what happens to their country, clearly see what the leftist-media and the Democrat Party have become and they do not like it. Bottom line concerning the Democratic Party, leftist media, former FBI Directory James Comey, everyone who is out to take down President Trump -- if Trump succeeds they lose, it’s that simple. If an outsider comes in and is successful that means game over for career politicians and lifelong government officials. They lose their power.

The Congressional Republicans are allowing this to happen. Why would they stand aside allowing this and offering no support unless they believe Mueller will be successful against President Trump. And because of this they are not pushing to move his agenda through the House and Senate. The Democrats are convinced they have already succeeded in being able to win back the House in 2018. A number of Republicans who are up for reelection in 2018 had better get off their sorry asses and throw their support behind President Trump. He was responsible for the wave of Republican victories in the last election and these useless GOP hacks had better realize it before they find themselves packing and leaving DC.

Why have the power if the party is not going to use it? This so-called 'investigation' should have limits, the Mueller probe should only be able to investigate the Russian connection - and there exists nothing that can honestly be proven to tie President Trump's victory - with whatever the Russians did prior to and during the 2016 election. An independent council should not be allowed to look at everyone and everything within the administration, and Trump's finances and his family. The simple explanation is they are being targeted because Mueller and Comey with help from the media and Democrats want Donald Trump gone.

~ Links To More News & Video ~

Can A Divided America Survive?

The Congressional Shooting Was A Left Wing Assault On Democracy

Loretta Lynch Called For 'Blood And Death' In The Streets To Oppose Trump

FBI Warned Of Obligation To Recover Records Unlawfully Stolen By James Comey

Former Special Counsel Ken Starr:
No Evidence Of Obstruction Of Justice Against Trump

Thursday, June 15, 2017

Radicalized By Leftists, James T. Hodgkison Attempted
Mass Murder Of Some Republican Members Of Congress


On June 14, 2017 - James T Hodgkison (66) shot five people: ♦ House GOP Whip Steve Scalise, ♦ Zak Barth (congressional aide), ♦ Matt Mika (lobbyist,) ♦ David Bailey (capitol hill police) and ♦ Krystal Griner (capitol hill police)
Hodgkinson Was Killed At The Scene By Capital Hill Police.

Democrat Supporter And GOP Baseball
Practice Shooter James T. Hodgkinson



Hodgkinson's Facebook Page Looks Like
A CNN Panel Discussing Trump And Russia


Shooter James T. Hodgkinson, Anti-Trump And Bernie Sanders
Supporter Who Wrote, "Time To Destroy Trump And Company."

Senator Bernie Sanders Apologizes For His
Campaign Worker Shooting Members Of Congress


Blog Author's Comments: I wish a speedy recovery for all the shooting victims of MSNBC, CNN, CBS, ABC and NBC. Democrats promoting violence against Republicans now happens quite often. The left has managed to normalize mindless violence as the new liberal pattern. The left has rioted constantly since the election destroying millions of dollars in property. The left has viciously attacked innocent people for simply supporting the candidate of their choice. The left has decapitated Trump in effigy. The left has stabbed Trump to death in effigy. Now their abject violence is coming to full fruition. The left is getting the savagery they have incited and demanded. The left has made it crystal clear that they will not only criticize but attempt to do harm to anyone who subscribes to an ideology different than theirs. But now, after the shooting the mainstream media will quickly sweep this story under the rug. Does anyone believe the leftist media will change their attacks on President Trump and the GOP in any way? I don't believe it will happen. It will be business as usual for the so-called journalists who cannot and never will accept the fact that their candidate lost the election.

The Democrats have promised a wave of violent protests this summer. There is no doubt that they regard violence as a means to get what they want. The deranged shooter was goaded into his insanity by the leftist politicians, media and entertainment industry not to mention Hillary with her 'basket of deplorables', that she would like to see eliminated. The people at the FBI still can't say that it was a hate-crime either. It's time to clean up the FBI, and the leftist mainstream media. Obama, Hillary, and others on the left encouraged anarchy, this mob mentality, he divided us by race, class, traditions, Obama's refusal to condemn attacks on our police and military spoke volumes. Eight years of unchecked, Marxist, Socialism does that, it subverts all foundations and institutions, from education, to media, to putting politics into everything. And on the subject of 'compromise' - which I have heard the talking heads banter about for a day, this will not happen. The Democrats and leftist media are too far gone for any compromise or agreement between the liberals and Republican Party to occur.

~ Links To More News & Video ~

VA Democrat Governor Claims 93 Million
Americans Are Killed
By Guns Every Day

Shooting At GOP Baseball Practice Latest
In Pattern Of Violence
Against Republicans

Hodgkinson: 'One Of My Favorite TV
Shows Is "The Rachel Maddow"
On MSNBC'

Tucker Carlson And Mark Steyn
Discuss Left-Wing Political Violence

Wednesday, June 14, 2017

Defense Secretary Mattis Shocked By Lack Of Military Readiness Of U.S.


NY Post -- Defense Secretary James Mattis said Monday he’s “shocked” by the decline in US military readiness and placed the blame squarely on Congress.

Mattis scolded lawmakers on Capitol Hill for failing to pass military budgets and for imposing automatic spending cuts known as sequestration that have caused “severe” damage.

“I retired from military service three months after sequestration took effect,” Mattis, a former Marine Corps general who retired in 2013, said. “Four years later, I’ve returned to the department and I have been shocked by what I’ve seen about our readiness to fight.”

Testifying before the House Armed Services Committee, Mattis told members of Congress they’ve caused “harm” by their lack of leadership.

“While nothing can compare to the heartache caused by the loss of our troops during these wars, no enemy in the field has done more to harm the combat readiness of our military than sequestration,” Mattis said. “We have only sustained our ability to meet America’s commitments abroad because our troops have stoically shouldered a much greater burden.”

Mattis is asking Congress to pass President Trump’s 2018 spending request of $639.1 billion, to end sequestration and to allow the military to appropriately plan by passing a budget on time.

Blog Author's Comments: Many people in Congress are simply apprehensive or afraid to take a stand and do what is right, because what is most important to them - their main concern - is to be reelected. Meanwhile the men and women in our military are risking their lives to defend and carry out the policies set by Congress. Eight years of Obama and not enough pushback by the members of the Republican Congress have left us in a very disturbing position. And who would know better what America needs militarily, than former retired Marine General and DEFSEC James Mattis?

Defense Secretary Mattis now knows what our military situation is and clearly sees what has happened and what needs to be accomplished. During Obama's time in office the Republicans were too busy trying to evaluate how to look like they were the opposition party while giving Obama almost everything he wanted. And we also cannot forget about the $1.7 billion that Obama gave Iran. We could have used it to spend on our defense instead of theirs. We dodged a serious bullet when President Trump defeated Hillary Clinton. And we continue to learn just how very serious that bullet was every day.

At this point in time, the major reason the GOP is apparently not ready with at least, basic plans of their own to not only expand and strengthen the military, but have a healthcare plan to replace the Affordable Care Act and other major items that are on Trump's agenda, is because they were sure Clinton would win the presidency, and the Republican members of Congress could coast and pretend to fight back against the Democrats.

If Hillary had been able to nominate Supreme Court Justices it would have set the country back at least a generation and perhaps forever. So, now is the time for the Republican members of Congress to work together and move the legislation to President Trump's desk so that he can sign it into law. There is so much that needs to happen prior to the 2018 mid-term elections and the presidential election of 2020, if the Republicans are serious about maintaining control of the government and doing what is right for the country.


~ Links To More News ~

Why Robert Mueller Should Resign As Special Counsel

Three Members Of Mueller's Team Have Donated To Democrats

Comey Admitted Single Trump Leak, But Were There Others?

Comey And Mueller Have A History As A Deep State Tag Team

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Political Videos & Links To Political News...



Gohmert: The Obama DOJ, Not
Russians, Tried To Influence 2016 Election


After His Testimony, It's Clear Comey Deserved To Be Fired

Sen. James Lankford(R-OK) On 'Face The Nation'


Corruption And Collusion: Obama, Comey, And The Press

Dem. Senator Dianne Feinstein Calls
For Investigation Into Loretta Lynch


Robert Mueller Should Step Aside: Friends Shouldn't Be Investigating Friends

James Comey Admits Loretta Lynch
Tried To Cover Up Hillary Clinton Investigation


Trump Is Beating The Media At It's Own Game

RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel
And 'Fox Liberal' Chris Wallace


Report: John McCain Hails Obama's Foreign Policy Leadership

Limbaugh: Comey Lied When He
Said He Only Wrote Memos On Trump


Gingrich Doubts Mueller's Integrity After Looking At His Staff

Judge Jeanine Pirro's Interview With
Donald Trump Jr. About Comey Testimony


From Mark Levin: Friday on his nationally syndicated radio show, conservative talker Mark Levin, author of the forthcoming book “Rediscovering Americanism: And the Tyranny of Progressivism,” read from a Federalist piece by Ben Domenech laying out how Domenech viewed CNN’s “war” on President Donald Trump.

Domenech argued CNN was sacrificing “balance and centrism” in its quest against Trump.

Levin agreed with Domenech’s findings but took it a step further by declaring that CNN was “destroying the First Amendment” and that Trump was right to say the media are evil in some circumstances and singled out CNN’s Jake Tapper.

“You can see how CNN has changed its coverage,” Levin said. “CNN is at war with Trump. CNN is violating – CNN is destroying the First Amendment and freedom of the press. And when Jake Tapper says, ‘How dare President [Trump] call us evil?’ Jake, you’re evil. You’re unconscionable. All of you – because you know exactly what you’re doing. You don’t care.”

Monday, June 12, 2017

James Comey's Media Leak Pipeline
Daniel Richman, Has Gone Into Hiding


TLR -- This is transparently suspicious. But don’t rely on the media to point out that clearly innocent people do not need to duck for cover.

The Columbia University professor, Daniel Richman, that the fired FBI Director James Comey utilized as the go-between to provide leaks to the media, has gone into hiding.

According to the New York Post Mr. Richman headed out of town mid-day on Thursday just as FBI Director James Comey told congress that his friend was utilized to feed leaks to the New York Times.

New York – A Columbia University professor from Brooklyn went into hiding Thursday after pal James Comey revealed during his Senate testimony that the man leaked memos detailing the former FBI chief’s conversations with President Trump to the press.

Daniel Richman confirmed by e-mail to several reporters that he was the “good friend” and law-school professor who Comey gave the documents — then bolted out of his Brooklyn Heights home and refused to answer any more questions.

It is absolutely certain that James Comey and Daniel Richman will need to coordinate their stories because the information that Comey gave to congress must match with the timeline of events he described.

Blog Author's Comments: Richman is a former federal prosecutor who worked with Comey at Columbia in 2013. His Ivy League university’s Web site crashed as people nationwide frantically tried to find out more about the mysterious middle man suddenly thrust into the biggest story in the country.

But Richman had vanished from his Henry Street digs by midday, and family members, friends and neighbors wouldn’t answer doors or phone calls to shed any light on where he might be.

How many stories did Daniel Richman leak? How many times did James Comey use Daniel Richman to leak? How was Richman the source for the May 11th New York Times “loyalty” story, if Richman didn’t have the Comey memos until May 16th? There are so many questions for Comey and Richman. And now Richman hides, has skedaddled, ran away.

Donald Trump must have known what Comey was up to. He cleared his office to talk to Comey. He told him something (perhaps Flynn is a good guy) that nobody else would hear, if it leaked, Trump knew that the leaker was Comey.

Folks, the Democrats/MSM - one and the same - and the GOP/RINOS are perhaps conspiring with each other, the Deep State forces and Obama holdovers within the Intelligence community and other Federal Agencies with the Washington Elites, and could be attempting a coup to take down President Trump. The man we the people put into office. And if this is the scenario, this is serious trouble because a large number of Americans do not want them to be successful.


~ Links To More News ~

Proof That James Comey Mislead The Senate Intelligence Committee

Legal Experts: Comey Testimony Proves Trump Innocent Of Obstruction Charges

Fast And Furious Hearing Rips Obama And Holder For Obstruction

Report: Comey Could Land Multi-Million Dollar Book And Film Deals

Crazed Maxine Waters Doesn't Care About Comey's Testimony, Calls Trump A Liar

Jay Sekulow And 'Little'
George Stephanopoulos Of ABC

Jay Sekulow is the Chief Counsel of the
American Center for Law and Justice.